Canadian doctor asks: who benefits from toxic vaccines and genocide?
Tuesday, 29 September 2009 08:32
News - Latest News
< Prev Next >
Canadian doctor questions the rationale for compulsory vaccination programs
Why Vaccination Continues, by Ghislaine Lanctot, M.D.
What is the objective of the world authorities in destroying people’s health, both in industrialized countries and in the Third World? It is always difficult to presume the intentions of others, particularly when one is not close to them. And this is true in this instance. But there are certainly advantages for someone, somewhere, to so doggedly keep-up the campaign for vaccinations, by any and all means possible. They must profit someone, somewhere. One thing is certain. It is not to our advantage. In order to determine what these advantages are, and for whom, let us stop and look at the CONSEQUENCES of these massive vaccination programs and draw our own conclusions.
1. Vaccination is expensive and represents a cost of one billion dollars annually. It therefore benefits the industry; most notably, the multinational manufacturers. One sells the vaccines. The other then provides the arsenal of medications to respond to the numerous complications that follow. Their profits increase while our expenses go through the roof. To the point where we have simply had it up to here and are ready to accept the unacceptable, such as socialized medicine in the United States, for example.
2. Vaccination stimulates the immune system, the body’s defense mechanism. Repeated, vaccination exhausts the immune system. It gives a false sense of security and, in doing so, it opens the door wide to all kinds of illnesses. Notably, to those related to AIDS, which can only develop on ripe ground, where the immune system has been disturbed. It causes AIDS to explode. It ensures that the illness flourishes perpetually.
3. Vaccination leads to social violence and crime. What better way to destabilize a country than to disarm its inhabitants, and reinforce police and military control? The authorities subtly create situations of panic and fear among the population which, in turn, necessitate the reinforcement of “protection measures”, including forbidding citizens from owning weapons. The authorities then come across as saviours and strengthen their control. It is certain that, in order to impose a single world army, one must first disarm the citizens of every country. One must therefore create violence, if they are to achieve this disarmament, particularly in the United States where the right to bear arms is guaranteed by the Constitution.
4. Vaccination encourages medical dependence and reinforces belief in the inefficiency of the body. It creates people who need permanent assistance. It replaces the confidence one has in oneself with a blind confidence in others, outside ourselves. It leads to loss of personal dignity, in addition to making us financially dependent. It draws us into the vicious circle of sickness (fear – poverty – submission) and, in this way, ensures the submission of the herd so as to better dominate and exploit it. And then lead them to the abattoir. To slaughter.
Vaccination also encourages the moral and financial dependence of Third World countries. It perpetuates the social and economic control of Western countries over them.
5. Vaccination camouflages the real socio-political problems of poverty of some due to exploitation by others, and results in techno-scientific pseudo-solutions that are so complicated and sophisticated that patients cannot understand them. In addition, vaccination diverts funds which should be used to help improve living conditions, and channels them into the banks of the multinationals. It widens the gap between the dominant rich and the exploited poor.
6. Vaccination decimates populations. Drastically in Third World countries. Chronically in industrialized countries. In this regard, the former President of the World Bank, former Secretary of State in the United States, who ordered massive bombing of Vietnam, and member of the Expanded Program on Immunization, Robert McNamara, made some very interesting remarks. As reported by a French publication, “j’ai tout compris”, he was quoted as stating:
“One must take draconian measures of demographic reduction against the will of the populations. Reducing the birth rate has proved to be impossible or insufficient. One must therefore increase the mortality rate. How? By natural means. Famine and sickness.” (Translation)
7. Vaccination enables the selection of populations to be decimated. It facilitates targeted genocide. It permits one to kill people of a certain race, a certain group, a certain country. And to leave others untouched. In the name of health and well-being, of course.
Take Africa, for example. We have witnessed the almost total disappearance of certain groups. Some 50% dead, estimate the most optimistic. Some 70% dead, according to the less optimistic. As if by chance, many were in the same region, such as Zaire, Uganda, the extreme south of the Sudan. In 1967, at Marburg in Germany, seven researchers, working with green African monkeys, died of an unknown hemorrhagic fever. In 1969, also by chance, the same sickness killed one thousand people in Uganda. In 1976, a new unknown hemorrhagic fever killed in the south of Sudan. Then in Zaire.
It is noteworthy that sincel968, virologists (virus specialists) have installed their sophisticated equipment in certain hospitals in Zaire.
At a CIA hearing, Dr. Gotlieb, a cancerologist, admitted having dispersed, in 1960, a large quantity of viruses in the Congo River (in Zaire) to pollute it and contaminate all the people who used the river as their source of water. Dr. Gotlieb was named to head up the National Cancer Institute!
A couple of years ago, Reuters reported: ‘An illness similar to AIDS has killed 60,000 in the south of Sudan. They call the illness, the killer. Families, whole villages, have disappeared This illness, the Kala-azar, takes the form of a fever and toss of weight. The symptoms are the same as those of AIDS The immune system is deficient and one dies of other infections.”
It is obvious that Africa, particularly those countries in the center and to the south, contain fabulous resources that have always incited westerners to crush their inhabitants to take over their riches. And beware anyone who stands in their way. The colonies have disappeared. But not colonialism.
8. Vaccination serves as a form of experimentation, to test new products on a great sampling of a population. Under the guise of health and the well being of the population, people are vaccinated against a pseudo-epidemic with products that one wants to study. The vaccine of hepatitis B seems to be the choice of authorities to accomplish this goal. Yet, this vaccine is manufactured by a process of genetic manipulation. And it is much more dangerous than the traditional vaccine because it inoculates into the body cells that are foreign to its genetic code. Moreover; this vaccine is produced from virus cultivated on the ovaries of Chinese hamsters. One can only imagine what future generations will look like! But there is more. It is also reported to cause cancer of the liver. Despite all that, it enjoys great popularity among the authorities, who impose it first on all those who work in the health field, and then on the rest of the population.
In 1986, the medical authorities administered the vaccine against hepatitis B to Native Indian children in Alaska, without any explanation or the consent of their parents. Many children fell ill. And several died. It seems there was a virus called RSV (Rous Sarcoma Virus) in the vaccine. (1)
American Indian tribes have been subjected to many vaccinations. Let us be aware that they are difficult to beat into submission, and they own vast tracts of land which the authorities would like to have for their own benefit.
Recently when I met a group of Native women to chat about health with them, the subject of vaccinations cropped up. I was giving them some information on the topic when, suddenly, the group’s nurse confided in me that the federal government had given her complete freedom in the management of their health, but on one strict condition. That every vaccination had to be scrupulously applied to all. The silence was deafening. We all understood.
In 1988, the Ambassador of Senegal gave a radio interview reporting on the ravages of AIDS in his country where entire villages were being decimated. A few years earlier, scientific and medical teams had come to vaccinate their inhabitants against hepatitis B.
In 1978, a new vaccine was tested on homosexuals in New York. And in 1980, on those in San Francisco, Los Angeles, Denver, Chicago, and St-Louis. Officially, this “new vaccine” was against hepatitis B and, as we now know, it caused many of them to die from AIDS. It sounded the “official” beginning of the AIDS epidemic in 1981.
The vaccination program of homosexuals against hepatitis B was led by Saint W.H.O. and the National Institute of Health . There are reports of collaboration between these two organizations in 1970 to study the consequences of certain viruses and bacteria introduced to children during vaccination campaigns. In 1972, they transformed this study to focus on the viruses which provoked a drop in the immune mechanism.
Wolf Szmuness directed the anti-hepatitis B experiments undertaken in New York. He had very close links with the Blood Centre where he had his laboratory, the National Institute of Health, the National Cancer Institute, the FDA., the W.H.O., and the Schools of Public Health of Cornell, Yale, and Harvard.
In 1994 a vast vaccination campaign against hepatitis B was undertaken in Canada. It is both useless, dangerous and costly. And what for? Is there a hidden agenda? I note that the Province of Quebec is a particular target, over the course of three years.
- 1992: vaccination against meningitis
- 1993: re-vaccination against meningitis
- 1994: vaccination against hepatitis B.
I was there in 1993. It troubled me to see that it was aimed at a whole generation (1 to 20 years), in only one province. Since when do viruses respect borders, and specially provincial ones at that? The facts are:
- There was no epidemic, nor risk of one. Epidemiologists confirmed it.
- Not one but three different vaccines were administered, each in a designated area.
- Certain nurses were selected and trained to administer a special vaccine.
- All children were entered into a computerized data bank.
- The pressure to vaccinate the children was enormous. Schools were turned into clinics. Those who did not want to be vaccinated were pointed out and treated as social outcasts.
- Nurses chased down parents at home who did not want their pre-school children vaccinated.
I had a direct account of one of these kids. The mother did not want her child vaccinated The nurse who came to the house made her believe that it was compulsory. The mother gave in… The child is now handicapped: physically and mentally (paralyzed spastic).
- The vaccination cost $30 million.
Why was there such a murderous will. Like Native peoples, the people of Quebec are also a “bother”. They believe in their cultural identity and in sovereignty. What is more, Quebec with its Native territories, encompasses huge reservoirs of water which many a multinational have their eyes on. As an acquaintance of mine who sits on the California water management board said, “Water today is gold.” Could one think of a more appropriate biological weapon to possibly remove any impediments to accessing that resource?
9. Vaccinations permit epidemiological studies of populations to collect data on the resistance of different ethnic groups to different illnesses. It permits one to study the reactions of the immune systems of large numbers of the population to an antigen (virus, microbe) injected by vaccination. Should it be within the framework of the fight against an existing illness, or one that has been provoked.
In 1987, certain American laboratories and the Department of Biotechnology of India signed an agreement authorizing the testing of genetically manufactured vaccines on the people of India. This agreement was met with fierce opposition because it gave access to epidemiological and immunity profiles of a population. This data is extremely important from a military standpoint. It is even more valuable because India has never experienced yellow fever. And, at time of writing this book, it had known only a handful case of AIDS. Over and above all that, the private American laboratories proposed to test products on the Indian population for which they had no right to test in the United States! And the Indian authorities acquiesced!
10. Vaccination is a biological weapon at the service of biological warfare. It permits the targeting of people of a certain race, and leaves the others who are close by more or less untouched. It makes it possible to intervene in the hereditary lineage of anyone selected. A new speciality is born. Genetic engineering. It is flourishing, enjoys much prestige, and is receiving substantial research hinds. The challenge is staggering. To find a vaccine which gives an illness against which we already have the vaccine! In this way, we would be able to send in troops who have already been vaccinated against the killer vaccine, which they would then spread among the enemy. It is absolutely crazy and insane!
Meanwhile, industrial theft is in full swing. Captain and biologist of the US Navy at Fort Detrick, Neil Levitt, reported the disappearance of 2.35 liters of an experimental vaccine. A dose sufficient to contaminate the entire world. Fort Detrick is a research laboratory which manufactures vaccines. It is located quite close to Washington, in Maryland, and it is attached to the National Cancer Institute at Bethesda, a suburb of the capital.
It is hardly astonishing that, in every major vaccination campaign, one finds the same tangled web. Government, the military, Saint W.H.O., financiers, researchers, laboratories, universities, the CIA, and the World Bank.
Let us not lose sight of the fact that:
In the name of the defense of our countries, we manufacture the most murderous of weapons. War; whether it be biological or not, is war. And weapons kill. Biological warfare is a giant business, largely financed BY OUR FUNDS, through the medium of the military, research, and our donations. It is also financed, and without our knowledge, BY OUR LIVES. Those of our children and of millions of innocents who have been sacrificed. It is we, those who live in the Western world, who are responsible for all the illnesses and acts of genocide in the world. By our acceptance of vaccinations, both at home and abroad.
Extracted with permission from The Medical Mafia by Guylaine Lanctot, M.D. ISBN 0964412608 (p.126-131)
Tuesday, September 29, 2009
H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccine Insert Admits It Causes Guillain-Barre Syndrome, Vasculitis, Paralysis, Anaphylactic Shock And Death
H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccine Insert Admits It Causes Guillain-Barre Syndrome, Vasculitis, Paralysis, Anaphylactic Shock And Death
The Swine Flu Vaccine Contains 25,000 Times The Amount Of Mercury That Is Considered Safe Fear And Panic Explode On U.S. College Campuses As Thousands Catch H1N1 Swine Flu »
H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccine Insert Admits It Causes Guillain-Barre Syndrome, Vasculitis, Paralysis, Anaphylactic Shock And Death
The package insert for the Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine manufactured by Novartis has been leaked on the Internet. According to that package insert, the vaccine (based on an earlier vaccine product known as Fluvirin) is known to cause a whole host of very nasty side effects such as guillain-barre syndrome, vasculitis, anaphylactic shock and even death.
Of course anyone who has been studying vaccine side effects already knows that it causes all of these things, but the story here is that the insert for the swine flu vaccine itself is admitting all of these things. The insert says that it was updated during September 2009, so it reflects the very latest information.
You can read the package insert for this vaccine for yourself right here.....
http://www.fluscam.com/Vaccine_Package_Inserts_files/Novartis_A-H1N1_2009_Monvalent_VaccinePackageInsert_BasedOn1980Approvalfor%20Fluvirin_UCM182242.pdf
The following is a list of some of the very nasty side effects that the vaccine package insert admits to.....
*Local injection site reactions (including pain, pain limiting limb movement, redness, swelling, warmth, ecchymosis, induration)
*Hot flashes/flushes
*Chills
*Fever
*Malaise
*Shivering
*Fatigue
*Asthenia
*Facial edema.
*Immune system disorders
*Hypersensitivity reactions (including throat and/or mouth edema)
*In rare cases, hypersensitivity reactions have lead to anaphylactic shock and death
*Cardiovascular disorders
*Vasculitis (in rare cases with transient renal involvement)
*Syncope shortly after vaccination
*Digestive disorders
*Diarrhea
*Nausea
*Vomiting
*Abdominal pain.
*Blood and lymphatic disorders
*Local lymphadenopathy
*Transient thrombocytopenia.
*Metabolic and nutritional disorders
*Loss of appetite.
*Arthralgia
*Myalgia
*Myasthenia
*Nervous system disorders
*Headache
*Dizziness
*Neuralgia
*Paraesthesia
*Febrile convulsions
*Guillain-Barré Syndrome
*Myelitis (including encephalomyelitis and transverse myelitis)
*Neuropathy (including neuritis)
*Paralysis (including Bell’s Palsy)
*Respiratory disorders
*Dyspnea
*Chest pain
*Cough
*Pharyngitis
*Rhinitis
*Stevens-Johnson syndrome
*Pruritus
*Urticaria
*Rash (including non-specific, maculopapular, and vesiculobulbous).
Doesn't all that sound wonderful?
Doesn't that make you want to run out and sign up to get vaccinated?
Now keep in mind that this is just what the H1N1 swine flu vaccine insert admits to.
What else will this vaccine do to you if you take it?
The Swine Flu Vaccine Contains 25,000 Times The Amount Of Mercury That Is Considered Safe Fear And Panic Explode On U.S. College Campuses As Thousands Catch H1N1 Swine Flu »
H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccine Insert Admits It Causes Guillain-Barre Syndrome, Vasculitis, Paralysis, Anaphylactic Shock And Death
The package insert for the Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine manufactured by Novartis has been leaked on the Internet. According to that package insert, the vaccine (based on an earlier vaccine product known as Fluvirin) is known to cause a whole host of very nasty side effects such as guillain-barre syndrome, vasculitis, anaphylactic shock and even death.
Of course anyone who has been studying vaccine side effects already knows that it causes all of these things, but the story here is that the insert for the swine flu vaccine itself is admitting all of these things. The insert says that it was updated during September 2009, so it reflects the very latest information.
You can read the package insert for this vaccine for yourself right here.....
http://www.fluscam.com/Vaccine_Package_Inserts_files/Novartis_A-H1N1_2009_Monvalent_VaccinePackageInsert_BasedOn1980Approvalfor%20Fluvirin_UCM182242.pdf
The following is a list of some of the very nasty side effects that the vaccine package insert admits to.....
*Local injection site reactions (including pain, pain limiting limb movement, redness, swelling, warmth, ecchymosis, induration)
*Hot flashes/flushes
*Chills
*Fever
*Malaise
*Shivering
*Fatigue
*Asthenia
*Facial edema.
*Immune system disorders
*Hypersensitivity reactions (including throat and/or mouth edema)
*In rare cases, hypersensitivity reactions have lead to anaphylactic shock and death
*Cardiovascular disorders
*Vasculitis (in rare cases with transient renal involvement)
*Syncope shortly after vaccination
*Digestive disorders
*Diarrhea
*Nausea
*Vomiting
*Abdominal pain.
*Blood and lymphatic disorders
*Local lymphadenopathy
*Transient thrombocytopenia.
*Metabolic and nutritional disorders
*Loss of appetite.
*Arthralgia
*Myalgia
*Myasthenia
*Nervous system disorders
*Headache
*Dizziness
*Neuralgia
*Paraesthesia
*Febrile convulsions
*Guillain-Barré Syndrome
*Myelitis (including encephalomyelitis and transverse myelitis)
*Neuropathy (including neuritis)
*Paralysis (including Bell’s Palsy)
*Respiratory disorders
*Dyspnea
*Chest pain
*Cough
*Pharyngitis
*Rhinitis
*Stevens-Johnson syndrome
*Pruritus
*Urticaria
*Rash (including non-specific, maculopapular, and vesiculobulbous).
Doesn't all that sound wonderful?
Doesn't that make you want to run out and sign up to get vaccinated?
Now keep in mind that this is just what the H1N1 swine flu vaccine insert admits to.
What else will this vaccine do to you if you take it?
CDC Looks to Force Vaccines on a National Scale
CDC Looks to Force Vaccines on a National Scale
Today Thomas R. Frieden, head of CDC appeared before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform to testify on H1N1 and in a response to a question from Congressman Darrell Issa, said that the CDC would like to create federal mandates forcing vaccines on the public.
Issa asked about the "push back" from the New York medical professionals to the states mandate that they receive the H1N1 and seasonal flu shot and the case that the state has for forcing the vaccines. Frieden expressed the opinion that he believed that the state mandate is warranted, and that he thinks such mandates should take place at a federal level, although not this year.
This echos Julie Gerberding's comments to the New York Times last week in regard to the NY manndate that CDC wanted to implement forced vaccines while she was there.
"The unions do not oppose vaccination “but we oppose a mandatory program,” he said. “This is: ‘You don’t get the shot, you’re fired.’ ”
Some prominent health experts, however, were delighted.
Dr. Julie Gerberding, the former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, called New York’s move “a big deal.”
She had pushed for years for mandatory vaccinations — not just to protect health care workers, she explained, but to protect their patients, who are often aged, have weakened immune systems or are bedridden after surgery, which increases pneumonia risks.
“We tried to market the idea, to push people, to educate,” she said. “But looking back, broadly speaking, we failed. It’s time to look at a more aggressive approach.”
By contrast, her successor, Dr. Thomas R. Frieden, said last month that even though he expected a surge in swine flu deaths this winter and even though C.D.C. guidelines give health care workers first priority for the new vaccine, he would not push to make vaccinations mandatory."
Apparently the NYT was only partially right that Frieden wouldn't push for forced vaccinations. He wants to force them, just not this year.
I will add a transcript of Frieden's exact comments to the committee when it becomes available.
UPDATE: The Committee's office says that the video will be available on their web site tomorrow, but the full transcript will take more time.
I will add the video tomorrow.
Today Thomas R. Frieden, head of CDC appeared before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform to testify on H1N1 and in a response to a question from Congressman Darrell Issa, said that the CDC would like to create federal mandates forcing vaccines on the public.
Issa asked about the "push back" from the New York medical professionals to the states mandate that they receive the H1N1 and seasonal flu shot and the case that the state has for forcing the vaccines. Frieden expressed the opinion that he believed that the state mandate is warranted, and that he thinks such mandates should take place at a federal level, although not this year.
This echos Julie Gerberding's comments to the New York Times last week in regard to the NY manndate that CDC wanted to implement forced vaccines while she was there.
"The unions do not oppose vaccination “but we oppose a mandatory program,” he said. “This is: ‘You don’t get the shot, you’re fired.’ ”
Some prominent health experts, however, were delighted.
Dr. Julie Gerberding, the former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, called New York’s move “a big deal.”
She had pushed for years for mandatory vaccinations — not just to protect health care workers, she explained, but to protect their patients, who are often aged, have weakened immune systems or are bedridden after surgery, which increases pneumonia risks.
“We tried to market the idea, to push people, to educate,” she said. “But looking back, broadly speaking, we failed. It’s time to look at a more aggressive approach.”
By contrast, her successor, Dr. Thomas R. Frieden, said last month that even though he expected a surge in swine flu deaths this winter and even though C.D.C. guidelines give health care workers first priority for the new vaccine, he would not push to make vaccinations mandatory."
Apparently the NYT was only partially right that Frieden wouldn't push for forced vaccinations. He wants to force them, just not this year.
I will add a transcript of Frieden's exact comments to the committee when it becomes available.
UPDATE: The Committee's office says that the video will be available on their web site tomorrow, but the full transcript will take more time.
I will add the video tomorrow.
Monday, September 28, 2009
Schoolgirl, 14, dies and three classmates taken ill after being given new cervical cancer vaccine
Schoolgirl, 14, dies and three classmates taken ill after being given new cervical cancer vaccine
By Daily Mail ReporterLast updated at 9:40 PM on 28th September 2009
Comments (30)
Add to My Stories
A 14-year-old girl has died and three of her classmates are in hospital after receiving a jab as part of a national immunisation programme (file picture)
A 14-year-old schoolgirl died hours after being given the controversial cervical cancer vaccine today.
The teenager from Blue Coat Church of England School, in Coventry, died in hospital after receiving the Cervarix jab. The tragedy marks the first reported death since more than 1.5m doses of the injection were given to young girls as part of a national vaccination programme since last September in the UK.
A number of her classmates have reported side effects to the vaccine.
Critics say the case highlights the risks of mass vaccination, because no testing regime can ever pick up the rarest and potentially most lethal side effects. Tonight there were calls for the entire cervical cancer vaccination programme to be suspended, but officials from the Department of Health would not say whether it will be halted for tens of thousands of girls due to be given the vaccine in the coming months. But vaccine experts called for the mass programme to continue, saying it will help save 700 deaths from cervical cancer every year.
The girl died after having the jab administered. It is not yet known definitively whether the jab caused the death and a post mortem will take place.
But the batch of the vaccine used at the school has been quarantined to test whether it is faulty or contaminated during production or distribution.
Some other girls at the school have suffered from dizziness and nausea but it is understood that none have been sent to hospital.
The Cervarix vaccine is currently being given to all girls aged 12 and 13 in a nationwide programme. A catch-up programme will mean that everyone under the age of 18 will be given it by 2011.
The injection is voluntary but parents have to opt out of their children taking part in the programme and just 30per cent have done so.
It guards against infection by the sexually transmitted disease HPV, which causes 70 per cent of all cases of cervical cancer.
Although the cancer does not usually strike until middle age, the jab has to be given to girls before they start having sex to have the best effect. This has led anti-vaccine groups to claim it will encourage promiscuity.
Critics argue women are as well protected by regular smear tests and use of male contraception against the most common sexually transmitted strains of the virus.
Jackie Fletcher, of pressure group Jabs, said: ‘We must halt the vaccine programme immediately and not put further girls at risk before a thorough investigation is carried out.
‘We have heard from a large number of girls who have suffered adverse reactions from this vaccine. How many more severe adverse reactions do they need before they act?
University Hospital Coventry, where a 14-year-old girl died. Although it is too early to link the death to the vaccine, the batch has been impounded for tests
‘We are vaccinating thousands of girls against a disease they may not be at risk from. ‘Instead of giving them vaccines, we should be promoting other measures they should be taking – such as not being promiscuous and using a condom. The age of cervical cancer screening tests needs to be lowered from 25.’
The school vaccination programme followed clinical trials in 2005 on more than 18,000 women under the age of 26.
But critics have claimed the five-year study was too short and not enough pre-pubescent girls were involved in it.
Thousands of schoolgirls have experienced health problems after being given the jab.Some 2,118 teenage girls suffered side-effects from rashes to paralysis in the year since the vaccine was introduced in schools, according the Medicine and Healthcare Regulatory Agency.
Although the majority were mild, the reports include more serious conditions such as convulsions, heart palpitations and paralysis.
Around the world, Cervarix and another rival version, Gardasil, have been linked to 30 deaths as well as cases of Guillain- Barré syndrome - a little-understood malfunctioning of the immune system which can cause paralysis.
Last year the Daily Mail revealed that a girl had been paralysed with the rare Guillain Barre syndrome after having the Cervarix vaccine. Ashleigh Cave collapsed shortly after having the jab, leaving her with no feeling from the waist down. And in January 2008 two schoolgirls died after being given the rival Gardasil jab in Germany and Austria. Dr Caron Grainger, joint director for public health for NHS Coventry and Coventry City Council, said: ‘A 14-year-old girl took ill at a school in Coventry and was taken to University Hospital in the city where she later sadly died. Our sympathies are with the girl’s family and friends at this difficult time.‘The incident happened shortly after the girl had received her HPV Vaccine in the school. No link can be made between the death and the vaccine until all the facts are known and a post mortem takes place. NHS Coventry has taken the proactive step to quarantine the batch of vaccine being used as a precautionary measure only and have informed the regulatory authority. We are conducting an urgent and full investigation into the events surrounding this tragedy.’ Last night public health minister Gillian Merron said: 'Our deepest sympathies are with the family. It is important we have the results of further investigations as soon as possible to establish the cause of this sad event.'Cervarix is manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline.Dr Pim Kon, Medical Director, GlaxoSmithKline UK said: 'Our deepest sympathies are with the family and friends of the young girl. 'We are working with the Department of Health and MHRA to better understand this case, as at this stage the exact cause of this tragic death is unknown. As a precautionary measure, the batch of vaccine involved has been quarantined until the situation is fully understood.'To date the vast majority of suspected adverse reactions reported to MHRA in association with Cervarix vaccine have related either to the signs and symptoms of recognised side effects listed in the product information or were due to the injection process and not the vaccine itself.
Cervarix v Gardasil
Cervarix was chosen for the NHS programme because it offered 'best overall value for the NHS'.
The vaccine, made by GlaxoSmithKline, beat off its rival Gardasil, made by Merck, for the lucrative contract last year.
The jab is currently being offered to girls aged 12 and 13 years to protect against strains of the human papillomavirus (HPV), which is sexually transmitted and causes most cases of cervical cancer.
Both vaccines are equally effective against HPV strains, but Gardasil also protects against 90 per cent of genital warts.
However, the Department of Health secured a deal which meant a catch-up programme could be offered to older girls.
Around £100 million was earmarked for the programme involving young girls, while the two-year catch-up programme was expected to cost a further £20 million.
The NHS pays £80 a dose, plus admin and staff costs, and three jabs are given altogether.
Hidden risks of mass vaccination programmes
Thousands of side effects including some deaths after the use of HPV vaccines have been reported from around the world.
Government officials in the UK and elsewhere maintain the benefits outweigh the small risks of harm associated with any vaccine.
But campaigners claim the protection from jabs against cervical cancer is being bought at too high a price, considering there are other ways to prevent girls developing the disease such as regular smear tests.
In the UK there have been 4,000 side effects from Cervarix officially logged by the drug safety watchdog, the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency, from 2,000 patients.
But Jabs, the campaign group, says there have been cases where girls have suffered seizures, paralysis, severe headaches and blurred vision.
One 18-year-old girl has suffered multiple seizures every day since getting Cervarix, it claims, while another has been battling a form of paralysis since Easter.
There have been isolated deaths reported in Europe from countries where Gardasil has been used for mass vaccination, while the same vaccine has been implicated in the death of a 13-year-old from an autoimmune disease in the US.
The mass vaccination programmes advocated by public health doctors are necessary to confer the biggest benefits - the more girls you vaccinate, the greater the chance of eventually banishing the disease.
But this creates the problem of magnifying even the tiniest risk of a life-threatening side effect.
When millions of girls are getting jabs, then a one in a million risk becomes a reality several times over.
The production of millions of doses of vaccine year-on-year carries a different kind of risk, that of a rogue batch or contamination of a particular lot of vaccines at factory level or during distribution.
Jackie Fletcher, founder of Jabs, regrets that more follow-up has not been carried out before HPV vaccines have been embraced by the public health community.
She said 'The verdict from Government officials is always that side effects are to be expected, and anything serious that happens will be within an expected range.'
For example, the paralysing condition Guillain Barre syndrome affects a small number of teenage girls each year, therefore if a girl is struck within days of having an HPV jab this is likely to happen in the normal run of events. Correlation does not mean causation, say the experts.
However, Mrs Fletcher is concerned that here, as in the U.S., insufficient attention is paid by the authorities to reports of side effects.
The reporting systems are voluntary and some parents fear there may be a cluster of side effects that remain largely invisible because they are not being investigated.
Mrs Fletcher said 'None of these girls getting jabs against cervical cancer is certainly at risk of the disease.
'There are other ways to keep them safe that do not involve using a vaccine so we have to be very clear about the benefits and risks of vaccination in order to keep these girls safe.
'The risk-benefit equation with HPV vaccination is severely skewed in my opinion and unless the authorities scientifically investigate all these girls who suffered a reaction then we will never have the scientific evidence to say how truly safe it is.'Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1216714/Schoolgirl-14-dies-given-cervical-cancer-jab.html#ixzz0SRBTXxOC
By Daily Mail ReporterLast updated at 9:40 PM on 28th September 2009
Comments (30)
Add to My Stories
A 14-year-old girl has died and three of her classmates are in hospital after receiving a jab as part of a national immunisation programme (file picture)
A 14-year-old schoolgirl died hours after being given the controversial cervical cancer vaccine today.
The teenager from Blue Coat Church of England School, in Coventry, died in hospital after receiving the Cervarix jab. The tragedy marks the first reported death since more than 1.5m doses of the injection were given to young girls as part of a national vaccination programme since last September in the UK.
A number of her classmates have reported side effects to the vaccine.
Critics say the case highlights the risks of mass vaccination, because no testing regime can ever pick up the rarest and potentially most lethal side effects. Tonight there were calls for the entire cervical cancer vaccination programme to be suspended, but officials from the Department of Health would not say whether it will be halted for tens of thousands of girls due to be given the vaccine in the coming months. But vaccine experts called for the mass programme to continue, saying it will help save 700 deaths from cervical cancer every year.
The girl died after having the jab administered. It is not yet known definitively whether the jab caused the death and a post mortem will take place.
But the batch of the vaccine used at the school has been quarantined to test whether it is faulty or contaminated during production or distribution.
Some other girls at the school have suffered from dizziness and nausea but it is understood that none have been sent to hospital.
The Cervarix vaccine is currently being given to all girls aged 12 and 13 in a nationwide programme. A catch-up programme will mean that everyone under the age of 18 will be given it by 2011.
The injection is voluntary but parents have to opt out of their children taking part in the programme and just 30per cent have done so.
It guards against infection by the sexually transmitted disease HPV, which causes 70 per cent of all cases of cervical cancer.
Although the cancer does not usually strike until middle age, the jab has to be given to girls before they start having sex to have the best effect. This has led anti-vaccine groups to claim it will encourage promiscuity.
Critics argue women are as well protected by regular smear tests and use of male contraception against the most common sexually transmitted strains of the virus.
Jackie Fletcher, of pressure group Jabs, said: ‘We must halt the vaccine programme immediately and not put further girls at risk before a thorough investigation is carried out.
‘We have heard from a large number of girls who have suffered adverse reactions from this vaccine. How many more severe adverse reactions do they need before they act?
University Hospital Coventry, where a 14-year-old girl died. Although it is too early to link the death to the vaccine, the batch has been impounded for tests
‘We are vaccinating thousands of girls against a disease they may not be at risk from. ‘Instead of giving them vaccines, we should be promoting other measures they should be taking – such as not being promiscuous and using a condom. The age of cervical cancer screening tests needs to be lowered from 25.’
The school vaccination programme followed clinical trials in 2005 on more than 18,000 women under the age of 26.
But critics have claimed the five-year study was too short and not enough pre-pubescent girls were involved in it.
Thousands of schoolgirls have experienced health problems after being given the jab.Some 2,118 teenage girls suffered side-effects from rashes to paralysis in the year since the vaccine was introduced in schools, according the Medicine and Healthcare Regulatory Agency.
Although the majority were mild, the reports include more serious conditions such as convulsions, heart palpitations and paralysis.
Around the world, Cervarix and another rival version, Gardasil, have been linked to 30 deaths as well as cases of Guillain- Barré syndrome - a little-understood malfunctioning of the immune system which can cause paralysis.
Last year the Daily Mail revealed that a girl had been paralysed with the rare Guillain Barre syndrome after having the Cervarix vaccine. Ashleigh Cave collapsed shortly after having the jab, leaving her with no feeling from the waist down. And in January 2008 two schoolgirls died after being given the rival Gardasil jab in Germany and Austria. Dr Caron Grainger, joint director for public health for NHS Coventry and Coventry City Council, said: ‘A 14-year-old girl took ill at a school in Coventry and was taken to University Hospital in the city where she later sadly died. Our sympathies are with the girl’s family and friends at this difficult time.‘The incident happened shortly after the girl had received her HPV Vaccine in the school. No link can be made between the death and the vaccine until all the facts are known and a post mortem takes place. NHS Coventry has taken the proactive step to quarantine the batch of vaccine being used as a precautionary measure only and have informed the regulatory authority. We are conducting an urgent and full investigation into the events surrounding this tragedy.’ Last night public health minister Gillian Merron said: 'Our deepest sympathies are with the family. It is important we have the results of further investigations as soon as possible to establish the cause of this sad event.'Cervarix is manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline.Dr Pim Kon, Medical Director, GlaxoSmithKline UK said: 'Our deepest sympathies are with the family and friends of the young girl. 'We are working with the Department of Health and MHRA to better understand this case, as at this stage the exact cause of this tragic death is unknown. As a precautionary measure, the batch of vaccine involved has been quarantined until the situation is fully understood.'To date the vast majority of suspected adverse reactions reported to MHRA in association with Cervarix vaccine have related either to the signs and symptoms of recognised side effects listed in the product information or were due to the injection process and not the vaccine itself.
Cervarix v Gardasil
Cervarix was chosen for the NHS programme because it offered 'best overall value for the NHS'.
The vaccine, made by GlaxoSmithKline, beat off its rival Gardasil, made by Merck, for the lucrative contract last year.
The jab is currently being offered to girls aged 12 and 13 years to protect against strains of the human papillomavirus (HPV), which is sexually transmitted and causes most cases of cervical cancer.
Both vaccines are equally effective against HPV strains, but Gardasil also protects against 90 per cent of genital warts.
However, the Department of Health secured a deal which meant a catch-up programme could be offered to older girls.
Around £100 million was earmarked for the programme involving young girls, while the two-year catch-up programme was expected to cost a further £20 million.
The NHS pays £80 a dose, plus admin and staff costs, and three jabs are given altogether.
Hidden risks of mass vaccination programmes
Thousands of side effects including some deaths after the use of HPV vaccines have been reported from around the world.
Government officials in the UK and elsewhere maintain the benefits outweigh the small risks of harm associated with any vaccine.
But campaigners claim the protection from jabs against cervical cancer is being bought at too high a price, considering there are other ways to prevent girls developing the disease such as regular smear tests.
In the UK there have been 4,000 side effects from Cervarix officially logged by the drug safety watchdog, the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency, from 2,000 patients.
But Jabs, the campaign group, says there have been cases where girls have suffered seizures, paralysis, severe headaches and blurred vision.
One 18-year-old girl has suffered multiple seizures every day since getting Cervarix, it claims, while another has been battling a form of paralysis since Easter.
There have been isolated deaths reported in Europe from countries where Gardasil has been used for mass vaccination, while the same vaccine has been implicated in the death of a 13-year-old from an autoimmune disease in the US.
The mass vaccination programmes advocated by public health doctors are necessary to confer the biggest benefits - the more girls you vaccinate, the greater the chance of eventually banishing the disease.
But this creates the problem of magnifying even the tiniest risk of a life-threatening side effect.
When millions of girls are getting jabs, then a one in a million risk becomes a reality several times over.
The production of millions of doses of vaccine year-on-year carries a different kind of risk, that of a rogue batch or contamination of a particular lot of vaccines at factory level or during distribution.
Jackie Fletcher, founder of Jabs, regrets that more follow-up has not been carried out before HPV vaccines have been embraced by the public health community.
She said 'The verdict from Government officials is always that side effects are to be expected, and anything serious that happens will be within an expected range.'
For example, the paralysing condition Guillain Barre syndrome affects a small number of teenage girls each year, therefore if a girl is struck within days of having an HPV jab this is likely to happen in the normal run of events. Correlation does not mean causation, say the experts.
However, Mrs Fletcher is concerned that here, as in the U.S., insufficient attention is paid by the authorities to reports of side effects.
The reporting systems are voluntary and some parents fear there may be a cluster of side effects that remain largely invisible because they are not being investigated.
Mrs Fletcher said 'None of these girls getting jabs against cervical cancer is certainly at risk of the disease.
'There are other ways to keep them safe that do not involve using a vaccine so we have to be very clear about the benefits and risks of vaccination in order to keep these girls safe.
'The risk-benefit equation with HPV vaccination is severely skewed in my opinion and unless the authorities scientifically investigate all these girls who suffered a reaction then we will never have the scientific evidence to say how truly safe it is.'Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1216714/Schoolgirl-14-dies-given-cervical-cancer-jab.html#ixzz0SRBTXxOC
The Great Culling Set to Begin Create the Epidemic Kill the Public With Injections of Squalene
The latest on tomorrow's NY Vaccin Choice Rallyhttp://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=3605
The "GREAT CULLING"Set to Begin:
1-2 Swine Flu Sucker Punch:
1. "Live Virus" Nasal Vaccine Starts Pandemic
2. Forced Squalene-Adjuvanted Vaccines End Reproductive Capacity, Sicken, May Kill 90%of Population
Special Message from General Bert:
Maj. Gen. Albert N. Stubblebine III (US Army, Ret.) Natural Solutions Foundation President
Dear Health Freedom Lover,
Natural Solutions Foundation has never had a more urgent message for you.
Forced Vaccination - of any type - is a disease of the Body Politic. Swine Flu Vaccination is a lethal one.
The H1N1 Swine Flu vaccines have been specifically prepared to cause wide-spread infertility and profound illness: You need to know this information AND you need to become a health advocate for yourself and your community NOW. We have little time.
Let's begin with the basics:
Sucker Punch 1:
Create the Pandemic
1. The first type of vaccine "ready" for distribution is a Live Attenuated Influenza Virus (LAIV) vaccine. administered by the nasal route. LAIVs are particularly dangerous both to the person who takes them AND to those around them. These vaccines cause people to shed the virus to others and infect them. The virus is then able to reassort or mutate as the infected persons (who may be too young to have any idea what is happening) go about spreading the virus into a varied community of friends, neighbors, family members, playmates, people on the subway, anyone.
People like young children, pregnant mothers, people on immunosuppressive drugs and others are told that they should avoid the live virus, yet it will be disseminated into those very populations with no controls or protections since pregnant women, children, First Responders, health care professionals and people with chronic diseases will receive this "first wave" of LAIVs.
What does that mean in detail? Please click here, http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=3582, to read more.
Sucker Punch 2:
Cull the Population While You Kill the Next Generation
2. In addition to what we already know about the squalene adjuvant and its ability to cripple and kill through powerful auto immune mechanismswhen injected, there is another, deeply shocking reason that the amount of squalene and squalene derivitives (called MF59, AS01, AS02, AS03, AS04, MLP, etc.) to be used in the coming mass vaccination is so insanely high when just a few molecules in the injection can wreak lifeling havoc.
A patent was filed in 1998 for a vaccine which causes permanent infertility when injected. When combined, the materials which cause sterility are a highly active immune irritant (an adjuvant) like squalene in very high doses and a porcine (pig) glycoprotein. Put them together in an injection and not only do you have auto immune consequences like death, or for those who do not die, crippling rheumatoid arthritis, Lou Gehrig's Disease, destruction of the muscles, diabetes, disabling rashes, mental and neurological problems a-plenty, but you have a population of infertile men women and children.
The "GREAT CULLING"Set to Begin:
1-2 Swine Flu Sucker Punch:
1. "Live Virus" Nasal Vaccine Starts Pandemic
2. Forced Squalene-Adjuvanted Vaccines End Reproductive Capacity, Sicken, May Kill 90%of Population
Special Message from General Bert:
Maj. Gen. Albert N. Stubblebine III (US Army, Ret.) Natural Solutions Foundation President
Dear Health Freedom Lover,
Natural Solutions Foundation has never had a more urgent message for you.
Forced Vaccination - of any type - is a disease of the Body Politic. Swine Flu Vaccination is a lethal one.
The H1N1 Swine Flu vaccines have been specifically prepared to cause wide-spread infertility and profound illness: You need to know this information AND you need to become a health advocate for yourself and your community NOW. We have little time.
Let's begin with the basics:
Sucker Punch 1:
Create the Pandemic
1. The first type of vaccine "ready" for distribution is a Live Attenuated Influenza Virus (LAIV) vaccine. administered by the nasal route. LAIVs are particularly dangerous both to the person who takes them AND to those around them. These vaccines cause people to shed the virus to others and infect them. The virus is then able to reassort or mutate as the infected persons (who may be too young to have any idea what is happening) go about spreading the virus into a varied community of friends, neighbors, family members, playmates, people on the subway, anyone.
People like young children, pregnant mothers, people on immunosuppressive drugs and others are told that they should avoid the live virus, yet it will be disseminated into those very populations with no controls or protections since pregnant women, children, First Responders, health care professionals and people with chronic diseases will receive this "first wave" of LAIVs.
What does that mean in detail? Please click here, http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=3582, to read more.
Sucker Punch 2:
Cull the Population While You Kill the Next Generation
2. In addition to what we already know about the squalene adjuvant and its ability to cripple and kill through powerful auto immune mechanismswhen injected, there is another, deeply shocking reason that the amount of squalene and squalene derivitives (called MF59, AS01, AS02, AS03, AS04, MLP, etc.) to be used in the coming mass vaccination is so insanely high when just a few molecules in the injection can wreak lifeling havoc.
A patent was filed in 1998 for a vaccine which causes permanent infertility when injected. When combined, the materials which cause sterility are a highly active immune irritant (an adjuvant) like squalene in very high doses and a porcine (pig) glycoprotein. Put them together in an injection and not only do you have auto immune consequences like death, or for those who do not die, crippling rheumatoid arthritis, Lou Gehrig's Disease, destruction of the muscles, diabetes, disabling rashes, mental and neurological problems a-plenty, but you have a population of infertile men women and children.
CDC Drafts “Isolation Order” for H1N1
CDC Drafts “Isolation Order” for H1N1
Text size
Kurt NimmoInfowarsSeptember 28, 2009
The following draft of an “isolation order” was discovered on the CDC’s website. It is a template for state and local officials to impose quarantines and what would effectively be martial law.
“Your illness [as determined by state and local officials] requires that you be isolated and requires further public health investigation and monitoring.”
Failure to obey will result in imprisonment without bail prior to trial and the possiblity of a two year prison term.
In other words, according to this document, officials can impose quarantine without evidence that somebody is actually infected with a virus that is now negligible at best. It may also be used to quarantine potentially millions of people suffering from any number of illnesses — or not suffering from any disease at the discretion of the state — that have nothing to do with H1N1. It is basically a carte blanche for martial law under the cover of protecting the public from a communicable disease that is demonstrably a manufactured and weaponized threat.
Text size
Kurt NimmoInfowarsSeptember 28, 2009
The following draft of an “isolation order” was discovered on the CDC’s website. It is a template for state and local officials to impose quarantines and what would effectively be martial law.
“Your illness [as determined by state and local officials] requires that you be isolated and requires further public health investigation and monitoring.”
Failure to obey will result in imprisonment without bail prior to trial and the possiblity of a two year prison term.
In other words, according to this document, officials can impose quarantine without evidence that somebody is actually infected with a virus that is now negligible at best. It may also be used to quarantine potentially millions of people suffering from any number of illnesses — or not suffering from any disease at the discretion of the state — that have nothing to do with H1N1. It is basically a carte blanche for martial law under the cover of protecting the public from a communicable disease that is demonstrably a manufactured and weaponized threat.
UK Government Denies Mandatory Swine Flu Vaccination Program
UK Government Denies Mandatory Swine Flu Vaccination Program
Acknowledges that newly authorised vaccines are untested
Steve WatsonInfowars.netMonday, Sept 28, 2009
The British Government has officially stated that it has no plans to implement a mandatory H1N1 mass vaccination program, despite previous statements intimating that it will, and despite the fact that its pandemic response planning is based on such a premise.
A portion of a statement from the Government on the number10.gov.uk website reads:
“No decision has been taken to embark on a mass vaccination campaign, but any vaccination against swine flu would not be compulsory. Everyone has a right to refuse the swine flu vaccination, or any other vaccination. Where a child is too young to consent themselves to being vaccinated, the right to decide rests with the person with parental responsibility.”
Health authorities have previously said they plan to have 60 million plus UK citizens vaccinated by next Summer (almost the entire population), despite the fact that only a handful of people have died from swine flu in Britain.
We have previously highlighted how regional H1N1 pandemic planning documents for the UK indicate that local authorities, in conjunction with other departmentalized agencies,intend to set up mass vaccination sites to be overseen by crowd control police.
One of the documents highlights a need to keep the location of mass vaccination centres secret from the public, while another lists a sports stadium as a location for mass public inoculation.
A sample vaccination order (PDF) originating from the NHS health authority in Bolton, Lancashire, states that people in the UK will be summoned for a vaccination at an “allocated” date and time at pre-planned mass vaccination centres, and that refusal to attend is not an option.
The fear of a planned mandatory nationwide roll out of the swine flu vaccine has prompted mass opposition in the UK.
The denial of a mandatory vaccination program comes in the form of a response to a petition to 10 Downing Street against the use of a swine flu virus as a bioweapon.
The Government’s response also states:
“The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has strict processes in place for licensing pandemic vaccines.”
However, the EMEA, which is heavily funded by the pharmaceutical industry, has recently granted marketing authorisation to two swine flu vaccines in spite of the fact the vaccines have not been tested.
Focetria produced by Novartis and Pandemrix produced by GlaxoSmithKline, which contains both squalene and thiomersal and is classified by the EU as a bioweapon, were authorised last week, and are likely to be authorised for use by the European Commission shortly.
“There is currently no clinical experience with Focetria (H1N1) in adults, including the elderly, children or adolescents,” notes the EMEA on its pandemic influenza H1N1 website.
In addition, EMEA also states on its pandemic website that there is “no clinical experience in the elderly, in children or in adolescents” with pandemrix.
“There is currently very limited clinical experience with an investigational formulation of Pandemrix (H1N1) containing a higher amount of antigen (see section 5.1) in healthy adults aged 18-60 years and no clinical experience in the elderly, in children or in adolescents.” the site notes.
Authorisation was given for the two vaccines based on research using “mock up” bird flu vaccines dating from 2007 and 2008, according to the EMEA.
The British Government’s statement also acknowledges this as it reads:
“In preparing for a pandemic, appropriate trials to assess safety and the immune responses have been carried out on vaccines very similar to the swine flu vaccine. The vaccines have been shown to have a good safety profile.”
The UK Government has intimate links with the makers of the Pandemrix vaccine, given that one its top advisors on swine flu also happens to be a sitting board member of GlaxoSmithKline.
Due to the fact that the vaccines are untested, the U.S. government is establishing an extensive tracking system to watch for possible side effects.
According to the New York Times, this involves “responding rapidly” to news stories linking the vaccines to heart attacks, strokes, seizures, spontaneous miscarriages and Guillain-Barré syndrome.
The move mirrors that of the British government, which sent a confidential letter to senior neurologists last month telling them to be on the alert for cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome, which could be triggered by the vaccine.
The news comes as the promised “second wave” of swine flu has been announced in the U.S.
Acknowledges that newly authorised vaccines are untested
Steve WatsonInfowars.netMonday, Sept 28, 2009
The British Government has officially stated that it has no plans to implement a mandatory H1N1 mass vaccination program, despite previous statements intimating that it will, and despite the fact that its pandemic response planning is based on such a premise.
A portion of a statement from the Government on the number10.gov.uk website reads:
“No decision has been taken to embark on a mass vaccination campaign, but any vaccination against swine flu would not be compulsory. Everyone has a right to refuse the swine flu vaccination, or any other vaccination. Where a child is too young to consent themselves to being vaccinated, the right to decide rests with the person with parental responsibility.”
Health authorities have previously said they plan to have 60 million plus UK citizens vaccinated by next Summer (almost the entire population), despite the fact that only a handful of people have died from swine flu in Britain.
We have previously highlighted how regional H1N1 pandemic planning documents for the UK indicate that local authorities, in conjunction with other departmentalized agencies,intend to set up mass vaccination sites to be overseen by crowd control police.
One of the documents highlights a need to keep the location of mass vaccination centres secret from the public, while another lists a sports stadium as a location for mass public inoculation.
A sample vaccination order (PDF) originating from the NHS health authority in Bolton, Lancashire, states that people in the UK will be summoned for a vaccination at an “allocated” date and time at pre-planned mass vaccination centres, and that refusal to attend is not an option.
The fear of a planned mandatory nationwide roll out of the swine flu vaccine has prompted mass opposition in the UK.
The denial of a mandatory vaccination program comes in the form of a response to a petition to 10 Downing Street against the use of a swine flu virus as a bioweapon.
The Government’s response also states:
“The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has strict processes in place for licensing pandemic vaccines.”
However, the EMEA, which is heavily funded by the pharmaceutical industry, has recently granted marketing authorisation to two swine flu vaccines in spite of the fact the vaccines have not been tested.
Focetria produced by Novartis and Pandemrix produced by GlaxoSmithKline, which contains both squalene and thiomersal and is classified by the EU as a bioweapon, were authorised last week, and are likely to be authorised for use by the European Commission shortly.
“There is currently no clinical experience with Focetria (H1N1) in adults, including the elderly, children or adolescents,” notes the EMEA on its pandemic influenza H1N1 website.
In addition, EMEA also states on its pandemic website that there is “no clinical experience in the elderly, in children or in adolescents” with pandemrix.
“There is currently very limited clinical experience with an investigational formulation of Pandemrix (H1N1) containing a higher amount of antigen (see section 5.1) in healthy adults aged 18-60 years and no clinical experience in the elderly, in children or in adolescents.” the site notes.
Authorisation was given for the two vaccines based on research using “mock up” bird flu vaccines dating from 2007 and 2008, according to the EMEA.
The British Government’s statement also acknowledges this as it reads:
“In preparing for a pandemic, appropriate trials to assess safety and the immune responses have been carried out on vaccines very similar to the swine flu vaccine. The vaccines have been shown to have a good safety profile.”
The UK Government has intimate links with the makers of the Pandemrix vaccine, given that one its top advisors on swine flu also happens to be a sitting board member of GlaxoSmithKline.
Due to the fact that the vaccines are untested, the U.S. government is establishing an extensive tracking system to watch for possible side effects.
According to the New York Times, this involves “responding rapidly” to news stories linking the vaccines to heart attacks, strokes, seizures, spontaneous miscarriages and Guillain-Barré syndrome.
The move mirrors that of the British government, which sent a confidential letter to senior neurologists last month telling them to be on the alert for cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome, which could be triggered by the vaccine.
The news comes as the promised “second wave” of swine flu has been announced in the U.S.
GARDASIL
Monday, September 28, 2009
WHY?? - Cervical cancer vaccinations for all girls
Posted by: jyuen
Three days ago it was announced that all 12 to 13 year old girls will be given the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine starting from next year (see attached news article or http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/9/25/nation/20090925121015&sec=nation).There are several areas of concern here that we the consumers and more importantly, the parents of these and future 12-13 year old girls need to consider.Firstly, is how safe is it? According to the related stories of the above Star news report, Cervical cancer vaccine: Who needs it, how it works (http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/cervical-cancer-vaccine/WO00120) which links you to the Mayo Clinic's website on the HPV vaccine which states that it is "to be remarkably safe...The most common complaint is soreness at the injection site, the upper arm. Low-grade fever or flu-like symptoms also are common. Sometimes dizziness or fainting occurs after the injection, especially in adolescents. Overall, the effects are usually mild." The concern here is that, with "mild" side effects like "flu-like symptoms" could lead to other drugs being given like for AH1N1 since most doctors now have been instructed to lean more to the over cautious side due to the current AH1N1 situation.Also, in the same section, it has stated that "some serious side effects have been reported, including a severe allergic response (anaphylaxis); neurological conditions, such as paralysis, weakness and brain swelling; and death." Although the site does try to justify it with the statement that "To date, almost all reports of such adverse side effects appear to have occurred around the time of vaccination by chance. They don't appear to be caused by the vaccination itself." Perhaps we should ask how many more people must be paralyzed or die till it does appear to be caused by the vaccination itself?While cervical cancer is indeed a major disease that we need to be concerned about, could it be a matter of putting our children more in harm's way with this HPV vaccine? I strongly suggest that you read this article Vaccine Safety Group Releases GARDASIL Reaction Report (http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/63586.php) posted on an online medical news website. Why Gardasil? Because it may be the HPV vaccine of choice for this in school vaccination program.This article mentioned "Out of the 385 individual GARDASIL adverse event reports made to VAERS (the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System), two-thirds required additional medical care and about one-third of all reports were for children 16-years-old and under, with nearly 25 percent of those children having received simultaneously one or more of the 18 vaccines that Merck did not study in combination with GARDASIL. NVIC is calling on the FDA and CDC to warn parents and doctors that GARDASIL should not be combined with other vaccines and that young girls should be monitored for at least 24 hours for syncopal (collapse/fainting) episodes that can be accompanied by seizure activity, as well as symptoms of tingling, numbness and loss of sensation in the fingers and limbs". The article also mentioned that ""There are twice as many children collapsing and four times as many children experiencing tingling, numbness and loss of sensation after getting a GARDASIL vaccination compared to those getting a Tdap (tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis) vaccination. There have been reports of facial paralysis and Guillain-Barre Syndrome" And the most amazing part of the health warning by the NVIC (the US National Vaccine Information Center) is "To avoid unnecessary injuries, teenage girls should be vaccinated laying down, not be left unattended and probably should not walk or drive themselves home from the doctor's office after they get vaccinated." And If that doesn't make one stop to think about how safe this HPV vaccine is, I don't know what will.The next question we should ask is how effective is the HPV vaccine? According to the Mayo Clinic website, "Yes. In clinical trials, the vaccine was effective in a group of sexually active women age 26 or younger, some of whom had already been infected with one or more types of HPV. There's a caveat, however. The cervical cancer vaccine blocks HPV types 6, 11, 16 and 18, but only if you haven't been exposed to those particular types of HPV." What if you already are? And from the Medical News Today website article, "NVIC also found that there were several VAERS reports of HPV infection, genital warts and cervical lesions after GARDASIL vaccination. It is unknown if the girls were infected with HPV before being vaccinated or if GARDASIL failed to protect them. One case of HPV infection occurred in a 22-year-old girl who had participated in a Merck GARDASIL trial in 2003 when she had shown "strong conversion to all 4 vaccine types" but "tested positive for high risk HPV" in 2006, according to the VAERS report." and "The FDA staff also questioned whether the "HPV types not contained in the vaccine might offset the overall clinical effectiveness of the vaccine." There are more than 15 types of HPV associated with cervical cancer but GARDASIL only contains HPV types 16 and 18."Two to four strains out of 15 that can cause cervical cancer as well as a possible ineffectiveness of the vaccine itself? Think about it.The third area of concern is do 12-13 year old girls fall into the high risk group for contracting cervical cancer?To answer this, let's look at how .Mayo Clinic - "Various strains of the human papillomavirus (HPV), which spreads through sexual contact, are responsible for most cases of cervical cancer." and "HPV spreads through sexual contact. To protect yourself from HPV, use a condom every time you have sex. It's also important to limit your number of sexual partners. Not smoking helps, too. Smoking doubles the risk of cervical cancer." And also "The more sexual partners you've had, the greater your chance of having been exposed to multiple types of HPV — including HPV types 6, 11, 16 and 18."Medical News Today - see what category this article is classified under "Sexual health / STD" From Wikipedia (and you can refer to their reference articles too) - "Although possible, transmission by routes other than sexual intercourse is less common for female genital HPV infection"One question we should ask - how sexually active are 12 to 13 year old girls? Would not better moral and religious education as well as parental guidance on avoiding pre marital sex or at least on safe sex be more effective in preventing HPV from spreading?The final word on this HPV vaccine is best stated in the last two paragraphs of the Medical News Today - "VAERS is a passive surveillance system and depends upon voluntary reporting of serious health problems following vaccination, even though safety provisions in the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 mandated that health care providers report vaccine adverse events. There have been estimates that fewer than 10 percent, even as low as 1 to 4 percent, of adverse events which occur after prescription drug or vaccine use are ever reported to government adverse event reporting systems."If only 1 to 4 percent of all adverse events associated with GARDASIL vaccination are being reported to VAERS, there could have been up to 38,000 health problems after GARDASIL vaccination in 2006 which were never reported," said NVIC President Barbara Loe Fisher. "How many girls are really having short-term health problems associated with getting this vaccine that could turn into long-term neurological or immune system disorders? And how many will go on to develop fertility problems, cancer or damage to their genes, all of which Merck admits in its product insert that it has not studied at all? We just don't know enough to be mandating GARDASIL for anyone, much less vulnerable 11 to 12 year old girls entering puberty."
WHY?? - Cervical cancer vaccinations for all girls
Posted by: jyuen
Three days ago it was announced that all 12 to 13 year old girls will be given the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine starting from next year (see attached news article or http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/9/25/nation/20090925121015&sec=nation).There are several areas of concern here that we the consumers and more importantly, the parents of these and future 12-13 year old girls need to consider.Firstly, is how safe is it? According to the related stories of the above Star news report, Cervical cancer vaccine: Who needs it, how it works (http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/cervical-cancer-vaccine/WO00120) which links you to the Mayo Clinic's website on the HPV vaccine which states that it is "to be remarkably safe...The most common complaint is soreness at the injection site, the upper arm. Low-grade fever or flu-like symptoms also are common. Sometimes dizziness or fainting occurs after the injection, especially in adolescents. Overall, the effects are usually mild." The concern here is that, with "mild" side effects like "flu-like symptoms" could lead to other drugs being given like for AH1N1 since most doctors now have been instructed to lean more to the over cautious side due to the current AH1N1 situation.Also, in the same section, it has stated that "some serious side effects have been reported, including a severe allergic response (anaphylaxis); neurological conditions, such as paralysis, weakness and brain swelling; and death." Although the site does try to justify it with the statement that "To date, almost all reports of such adverse side effects appear to have occurred around the time of vaccination by chance. They don't appear to be caused by the vaccination itself." Perhaps we should ask how many more people must be paralyzed or die till it does appear to be caused by the vaccination itself?While cervical cancer is indeed a major disease that we need to be concerned about, could it be a matter of putting our children more in harm's way with this HPV vaccine? I strongly suggest that you read this article Vaccine Safety Group Releases GARDASIL Reaction Report (http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/63586.php) posted on an online medical news website. Why Gardasil? Because it may be the HPV vaccine of choice for this in school vaccination program.This article mentioned "Out of the 385 individual GARDASIL adverse event reports made to VAERS (the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System), two-thirds required additional medical care and about one-third of all reports were for children 16-years-old and under, with nearly 25 percent of those children having received simultaneously one or more of the 18 vaccines that Merck did not study in combination with GARDASIL. NVIC is calling on the FDA and CDC to warn parents and doctors that GARDASIL should not be combined with other vaccines and that young girls should be monitored for at least 24 hours for syncopal (collapse/fainting) episodes that can be accompanied by seizure activity, as well as symptoms of tingling, numbness and loss of sensation in the fingers and limbs". The article also mentioned that ""There are twice as many children collapsing and four times as many children experiencing tingling, numbness and loss of sensation after getting a GARDASIL vaccination compared to those getting a Tdap (tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis) vaccination. There have been reports of facial paralysis and Guillain-Barre Syndrome" And the most amazing part of the health warning by the NVIC (the US National Vaccine Information Center) is "To avoid unnecessary injuries, teenage girls should be vaccinated laying down, not be left unattended and probably should not walk or drive themselves home from the doctor's office after they get vaccinated." And If that doesn't make one stop to think about how safe this HPV vaccine is, I don't know what will.The next question we should ask is how effective is the HPV vaccine? According to the Mayo Clinic website, "Yes. In clinical trials, the vaccine was effective in a group of sexually active women age 26 or younger, some of whom had already been infected with one or more types of HPV. There's a caveat, however. The cervical cancer vaccine blocks HPV types 6, 11, 16 and 18, but only if you haven't been exposed to those particular types of HPV." What if you already are? And from the Medical News Today website article, "NVIC also found that there were several VAERS reports of HPV infection, genital warts and cervical lesions after GARDASIL vaccination. It is unknown if the girls were infected with HPV before being vaccinated or if GARDASIL failed to protect them. One case of HPV infection occurred in a 22-year-old girl who had participated in a Merck GARDASIL trial in 2003 when she had shown "strong conversion to all 4 vaccine types" but "tested positive for high risk HPV" in 2006, according to the VAERS report." and "The FDA staff also questioned whether the "HPV types not contained in the vaccine might offset the overall clinical effectiveness of the vaccine." There are more than 15 types of HPV associated with cervical cancer but GARDASIL only contains HPV types 16 and 18."Two to four strains out of 15 that can cause cervical cancer as well as a possible ineffectiveness of the vaccine itself? Think about it.The third area of concern is do 12-13 year old girls fall into the high risk group for contracting cervical cancer?To answer this, let's look at how .Mayo Clinic - "Various strains of the human papillomavirus (HPV), which spreads through sexual contact, are responsible for most cases of cervical cancer." and "HPV spreads through sexual contact. To protect yourself from HPV, use a condom every time you have sex. It's also important to limit your number of sexual partners. Not smoking helps, too. Smoking doubles the risk of cervical cancer." And also "The more sexual partners you've had, the greater your chance of having been exposed to multiple types of HPV — including HPV types 6, 11, 16 and 18."Medical News Today - see what category this article is classified under "Sexual health / STD" From Wikipedia (and you can refer to their reference articles too) - "Although possible, transmission by routes other than sexual intercourse is less common for female genital HPV infection"One question we should ask - how sexually active are 12 to 13 year old girls? Would not better moral and religious education as well as parental guidance on avoiding pre marital sex or at least on safe sex be more effective in preventing HPV from spreading?The final word on this HPV vaccine is best stated in the last two paragraphs of the Medical News Today - "VAERS is a passive surveillance system and depends upon voluntary reporting of serious health problems following vaccination, even though safety provisions in the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 mandated that health care providers report vaccine adverse events. There have been estimates that fewer than 10 percent, even as low as 1 to 4 percent, of adverse events which occur after prescription drug or vaccine use are ever reported to government adverse event reporting systems."If only 1 to 4 percent of all adverse events associated with GARDASIL vaccination are being reported to VAERS, there could have been up to 38,000 health problems after GARDASIL vaccination in 2006 which were never reported," said NVIC President Barbara Loe Fisher. "How many girls are really having short-term health problems associated with getting this vaccine that could turn into long-term neurological or immune system disorders? And how many will go on to develop fertility problems, cancer or damage to their genes, all of which Merck admits in its product insert that it has not studied at all? We just don't know enough to be mandating GARDASIL for anyone, much less vulnerable 11 to 12 year old girls entering puberty."
Sunday, September 27, 2009
Swiss military ordered to vaccinate the Swiss population
Swiss military ordered to vaccinate the Swiss population
Last Updated on Sunday, 27 September 2009 10:01 Sunday, 27 September 2009 09:32
News - Latest News
Next >
Swiss military personnel have shared information with TheFluCase.com which state that the military are to vaccinate the Swiss population beginning on the 16:th of November and ending in December. We have seen documents ordering higher officers to take part of an orientation from the 11:th of November to the 13:th of November.The mandated vaccination is yet to be publicly announced but these documents prove that the plan is set and executed. There are of course no signs of a real flu pandemic of any kind and the so called "swine flu" is milder than the normal seasonal flu.The only way a forced vaccination could be motivated would be the spread of a deadlier version of the present "swine flu" virus. This artificial "second wave" would be marketed by world media as the reason everyone should get the vaccine.
Last Updated on Sunday, 27 September 2009 10:01 Sunday, 27 September 2009 09:32
News - Latest News
Next >
Swiss military personnel have shared information with TheFluCase.com which state that the military are to vaccinate the Swiss population beginning on the 16:th of November and ending in December. We have seen documents ordering higher officers to take part of an orientation from the 11:th of November to the 13:th of November.The mandated vaccination is yet to be publicly announced but these documents prove that the plan is set and executed. There are of course no signs of a real flu pandemic of any kind and the so called "swine flu" is milder than the normal seasonal flu.The only way a forced vaccination could be motivated would be the spread of a deadlier version of the present "swine flu" virus. This artificial "second wave" would be marketed by world media as the reason everyone should get the vaccine.
Saturday, September 26, 2009
Warning: Metal Water Bottles May Be Hazardous to Your Health
Warning: Metal Water Bottles May Be Hazardous to Your Health
Posted by: Dr. Mercola
September 26 2009 | 13,693 views
Countless eco-conscious consumers have switched to Sigg aluminum bottles because of bisphenol-A, or BPA, a substance commonly used to harden plastic that has raised health concerns.
But bottles made by Sigg Switzerland before August 2008 had "trace amounts" of BPA in the epoxy liners. Sigg officials knew it since June 2006, but didn't announce it until last month.
The bottles, which can sell for more than $20, include slogans like "simply eco logical."
Concerns about BPA stem from the fact that it can mimic estrogen, a powerful hormone.
Sources:
ABC News September 3, 2009
Dr. Mercola's Comments:
Bisphenol-A, or BPA is an estrogen-mimicking chemical used to make hard plastics and epoxy resins, found in numerous products that you probably use every day, including:
Polycarbonate plastic baby bottles
Large water-cooler containers and sports bottles
Bottle tops
Microwave-oven dishes
Canned-food liners
Some dental sealants for children
Water supply pipes
The use of BPA is so pervasive -- industry uses more than 6 billion pounds of BPA a year -- that scientists have found that 95 percent of people tested have dangerous levels of BPA in their bodies.
This is one valid reason why you should not tolerate the suggestion that “trace amounts” of toxins are okay.
The cumulative effect of being exposed to minuscule amounts of BPA from cans, bottles, plates and all other sources over the years can eventually spell serious trouble for your health.
Some of the biggest victims are your children, who may be exposed to the chemical while in utero, and quite literally “fed” the chemical via plastic baby bottles and toys (which they often put in their mouths).
How BPA Can Damage Your Health
In the last ten years, some 700 studies have been published about BPA -- most of them indicating serious health hazards, at least in animals. The most troubling problem with BPA is that it mimics the female hormone estrogen.
Your body is extremely sensitive to sex hormones, and miniscule amounts can induce profound changes. Therefore, scientists are afraid even low levels of BPA could have a negative impact on human health.
In animals, BPA increases aneuploidy, a defect consisting of abnormal loss or gain of chromosomes, which in humans could possibly lead to miscarriages or disorders such as Down Syndrome.
Moreover, there is evidence (among mice and rats) that even low doses of BPA can cause:
Hyperactivity
Early puberty
Increased fat formation
Abnormal sexual behavior
Disrupted reproductive cycles
Structural damage to the brain
It’s difficult to understand why U.S. health and environmental regulators keep insisting there is “no evidence of harm to human health after 50 years of use,” when this list contains some of the most wide spread health issues that have dramatically increased in that same time frame.
What’s Being Done to Protect You?
There has been some success in limiting the use of BPA. In May of this year, Minnesota legislature passed a statewide ban on the sale of baby bottles, sippy cups, and other children’s food containers made with BPA. Other states, including California, Connecticut, Michigan and New York, are considering similar legislation.
Some retailers have also made the wise decision to respond to consumer demand and have voluntarily eliminated some of their BPA products for sale.
It’s a good start, but clearly not enough. Hopefully, Congress will come through with their proposed legislation intended to establish a federal ban on BPA in all food and beverage containers.
Until then, there will be those who go the way of Sigg; claiming to be completely safe and “green,” while hiding the fact that their metal water bottles still contains trace elements of BPA in the lining.
A major problem with BPA is that it doesn’t stay in the plastic. It leeches into whatever food or beverage you put in a plastic container, canned good, or plastic baby bottle. Even worse, if you microwave the containers or bottles, or place hot liquids or food into them, BPA is released 55 times more rapidly!
Sigg claims their bottle linings do not allow for this type of leeching, but at this point, many consumers simply don’t believe that’s true, and are not willing to take that chance.
This story highlights an increasingly common concern: “Is nothing safe?”
Although it can be a tremendous challenge at times, I am still hopeful and always focus on the things I CAN do. And those are the strategies, techniques and guidelines I share with you each week through this newsletter.
Just know that you CAN protect yourself and your family by implementing certain changes. You may not be able to shield yourself completely, but you’ll be far better off than were you to pay no attention whatsoever.
Your body is capable of detoxing and cleaning out some of the toxins you’re exposed to on a daily basis, so as long as you’re maintaining a healthy lifestyle, and taking whatever measures you can to limit your exposure to toxins, you’re giving yourself the best chance you can to be as healthy as possible.
10 Tips to Reduce Your Exposure to BPA
Only use glass baby bottles and dishes for your baby
Give your baby natural fabric toys instead of plastic ones
Store your food and beverages in glass -- NOT plastic -- containers
IF you choose to use a microwave, don’t microwave food in a plastic container
Stop buying and consuming canned foods and drinks
Avoid using plastic wrap (and never microwave anything covered in it)
Get rid of your plastic dishes and cups, and replace them with glass varieties
If you opt to use plastic kitchenware, at least get rid of the older, scratched-up varieties, avoid putting them in the dishwasher, and don’t wash them with harsh detergents, as these things can cause more chemicals to leach into your food
Avoid using bottled water; filter your own using a reverse osmosis filter instead
Before allowing a dental sealant to be applied to you, or your children’s, teeth, ask your dentist to verify that it does not contain BPA
If you do opt to use plastic containers instead of glass, be sure to check the recycling label on the bottom of the container.
Avoid those marked on the bottom with the recycling label No. 7, as these varieties usually contain BPA.
No. 3 (DEHA) and No. 6 (Styrene) are also considered unsuitable for use with food due to their toxic ingredients.
Containers marked with the recycling labels No. 1, No. 2, No. 4, and No. 5 do not contain BPA, but they do contain other unsavory chemicals that are best avoided. Still, if you’re determined to stick with plastic, these four are considered to be better than the others.
The Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy’s Smart Plastics Guide offers more detailed descriptions of the most commonly occurring chemicals in plastic products.
The website Mother Jones also offers a handy chart that you can cut out and stick on your refrigerator.
Finding BPA-Free Products
Just like some retailers are ditching hazardous products, some are also increasingly marketing products that are BPA-free. Here’s an assortment of sources that carry BPA-free products:
Amazon.com‘s BPA-free section lists water bottles, baby bottles, and sippy cups.
Rubbermaid has an assortment of containers that do not contain BPA.
Nalgene now offers BPA-free water bottles.
Brita, which makes water filtration products, says that its pitchers and filters don‘t contain BPA.
SC Johnson, which makes Saran brand wraps and Ziploc bags and containers, says that it doesn‘t use BPA in its products.
The Z Recommends blog posted an updated guide in February that lists children‘s feeding products that don‘t contain BPA.
Related Links:
Toxic Compounds in Food Containers Wreak Havoc on Your Health
Store Your Food in Glass Not Plastic
Congress Moves to Ban BPA in All Food Containers
Posted by: Dr. Mercola
September 26 2009 | 13,693 views
Countless eco-conscious consumers have switched to Sigg aluminum bottles because of bisphenol-A, or BPA, a substance commonly used to harden plastic that has raised health concerns.
But bottles made by Sigg Switzerland before August 2008 had "trace amounts" of BPA in the epoxy liners. Sigg officials knew it since June 2006, but didn't announce it until last month.
The bottles, which can sell for more than $20, include slogans like "simply eco logical."
Concerns about BPA stem from the fact that it can mimic estrogen, a powerful hormone.
Sources:
ABC News September 3, 2009
Dr. Mercola's Comments:
Bisphenol-A, or BPA is an estrogen-mimicking chemical used to make hard plastics and epoxy resins, found in numerous products that you probably use every day, including:
Polycarbonate plastic baby bottles
Large water-cooler containers and sports bottles
Bottle tops
Microwave-oven dishes
Canned-food liners
Some dental sealants for children
Water supply pipes
The use of BPA is so pervasive -- industry uses more than 6 billion pounds of BPA a year -- that scientists have found that 95 percent of people tested have dangerous levels of BPA in their bodies.
This is one valid reason why you should not tolerate the suggestion that “trace amounts” of toxins are okay.
The cumulative effect of being exposed to minuscule amounts of BPA from cans, bottles, plates and all other sources over the years can eventually spell serious trouble for your health.
Some of the biggest victims are your children, who may be exposed to the chemical while in utero, and quite literally “fed” the chemical via plastic baby bottles and toys (which they often put in their mouths).
How BPA Can Damage Your Health
In the last ten years, some 700 studies have been published about BPA -- most of them indicating serious health hazards, at least in animals. The most troubling problem with BPA is that it mimics the female hormone estrogen.
Your body is extremely sensitive to sex hormones, and miniscule amounts can induce profound changes. Therefore, scientists are afraid even low levels of BPA could have a negative impact on human health.
In animals, BPA increases aneuploidy, a defect consisting of abnormal loss or gain of chromosomes, which in humans could possibly lead to miscarriages or disorders such as Down Syndrome.
Moreover, there is evidence (among mice and rats) that even low doses of BPA can cause:
Hyperactivity
Early puberty
Increased fat formation
Abnormal sexual behavior
Disrupted reproductive cycles
Structural damage to the brain
It’s difficult to understand why U.S. health and environmental regulators keep insisting there is “no evidence of harm to human health after 50 years of use,” when this list contains some of the most wide spread health issues that have dramatically increased in that same time frame.
What’s Being Done to Protect You?
There has been some success in limiting the use of BPA. In May of this year, Minnesota legislature passed a statewide ban on the sale of baby bottles, sippy cups, and other children’s food containers made with BPA. Other states, including California, Connecticut, Michigan and New York, are considering similar legislation.
Some retailers have also made the wise decision to respond to consumer demand and have voluntarily eliminated some of their BPA products for sale.
It’s a good start, but clearly not enough. Hopefully, Congress will come through with their proposed legislation intended to establish a federal ban on BPA in all food and beverage containers.
Until then, there will be those who go the way of Sigg; claiming to be completely safe and “green,” while hiding the fact that their metal water bottles still contains trace elements of BPA in the lining.
A major problem with BPA is that it doesn’t stay in the plastic. It leeches into whatever food or beverage you put in a plastic container, canned good, or plastic baby bottle. Even worse, if you microwave the containers or bottles, or place hot liquids or food into them, BPA is released 55 times more rapidly!
Sigg claims their bottle linings do not allow for this type of leeching, but at this point, many consumers simply don’t believe that’s true, and are not willing to take that chance.
This story highlights an increasingly common concern: “Is nothing safe?”
Although it can be a tremendous challenge at times, I am still hopeful and always focus on the things I CAN do. And those are the strategies, techniques and guidelines I share with you each week through this newsletter.
Just know that you CAN protect yourself and your family by implementing certain changes. You may not be able to shield yourself completely, but you’ll be far better off than were you to pay no attention whatsoever.
Your body is capable of detoxing and cleaning out some of the toxins you’re exposed to on a daily basis, so as long as you’re maintaining a healthy lifestyle, and taking whatever measures you can to limit your exposure to toxins, you’re giving yourself the best chance you can to be as healthy as possible.
10 Tips to Reduce Your Exposure to BPA
Only use glass baby bottles and dishes for your baby
Give your baby natural fabric toys instead of plastic ones
Store your food and beverages in glass -- NOT plastic -- containers
IF you choose to use a microwave, don’t microwave food in a plastic container
Stop buying and consuming canned foods and drinks
Avoid using plastic wrap (and never microwave anything covered in it)
Get rid of your plastic dishes and cups, and replace them with glass varieties
If you opt to use plastic kitchenware, at least get rid of the older, scratched-up varieties, avoid putting them in the dishwasher, and don’t wash them with harsh detergents, as these things can cause more chemicals to leach into your food
Avoid using bottled water; filter your own using a reverse osmosis filter instead
Before allowing a dental sealant to be applied to you, or your children’s, teeth, ask your dentist to verify that it does not contain BPA
If you do opt to use plastic containers instead of glass, be sure to check the recycling label on the bottom of the container.
Avoid those marked on the bottom with the recycling label No. 7, as these varieties usually contain BPA.
No. 3 (DEHA) and No. 6 (Styrene) are also considered unsuitable for use with food due to their toxic ingredients.
Containers marked with the recycling labels No. 1, No. 2, No. 4, and No. 5 do not contain BPA, but they do contain other unsavory chemicals that are best avoided. Still, if you’re determined to stick with plastic, these four are considered to be better than the others.
The Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy’s Smart Plastics Guide offers more detailed descriptions of the most commonly occurring chemicals in plastic products.
The website Mother Jones also offers a handy chart that you can cut out and stick on your refrigerator.
Finding BPA-Free Products
Just like some retailers are ditching hazardous products, some are also increasingly marketing products that are BPA-free. Here’s an assortment of sources that carry BPA-free products:
Amazon.com‘s BPA-free section lists water bottles, baby bottles, and sippy cups.
Rubbermaid has an assortment of containers that do not contain BPA.
Nalgene now offers BPA-free water bottles.
Brita, which makes water filtration products, says that its pitchers and filters don‘t contain BPA.
SC Johnson, which makes Saran brand wraps and Ziploc bags and containers, says that it doesn‘t use BPA in its products.
The Z Recommends blog posted an updated guide in February that lists children‘s feeding products that don‘t contain BPA.
Related Links:
Toxic Compounds in Food Containers Wreak Havoc on Your Health
Store Your Food in Glass Not Plastic
Congress Moves to Ban BPA in All Food Containers
Friday, September 25, 2009
Anti-depressants 'can increase risk of heart defect'
Anti-depressants 'can increase risk of heart defect'
Taking commonly used antidepressants while pregnant can increase the chance of the child suffering a heart defect up to fourfold, a new study shows.
By Kate Devlin, Medical CorrespondentPublished: 7:00AM BST 25 Sep 2009
Babies were around 80 per cent more likely to be born with a problem in their septum, the wall dividing the left and right sides of the heart, if their mother took the medication in the first three months of her pregnancy.
Taking commonly used antidepressants while pregnant can increase the chance of the child suffering a heart defect up to fourfold, a new study shows.
By Kate Devlin, Medical CorrespondentPublished: 7:00AM BST 25 Sep 2009
Babies were around 80 per cent more likely to be born with a problem in their septum, the wall dividing the left and right sides of the heart, if their mother took the medication in the first three months of her pregnancy.
Thursday, September 24, 2009
Parental exposure to pesticides and childhood brain cancer:
: Environ Health Perspect. 2009 Jun;117(6):1002-6. Epub 2009 Feb 13. Links
Parental exposure to pesticides and childhood brain cancer: U.S. Atlantic coast childhood brain cancer study.Shim YK, Mlynarek SP, van Wijngaarden E.
Division of Health Studies, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, Georgia 30341-3737, USA. Yshim@cdc.gov
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19590697?ordinalpos=2&itool=Email.EmailReport.Pubmed_ReportSelector.Pubmed_RVDocSum
BACKGROUND: The etiology of childhood brain cancer remains largely unknown. However, previous studies have yielded suggestive associations with parental pesticide use. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate parental exposure to pesticides at home and on the job in relation to the occurrence of brain cancer in children. METHODS: We included 526 one-to-one-matched case-control pairs. Brain cancer cases were diagnosed at < 10 years of age, and were identified from statewide cancer registries of four U.S. Atlantic Coast states. We selected controls by random digit dialing. We conducted computer-assisted telephone interviews with mothers. Using information on residential pesticide use and jobs held by fathers during the 2-year period before the child's birth, we assessed potential exposure to insecticides, herbicides, and fungicides. For each job, two raters independently classified the probability and intensity of exposure; 421 pairs were available for final analysis. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using conditional logistic regression, after adjustment for maternal education. RESULTS: A significant risk of astrocytoma was associated with exposures to herbicides from residential use (OR = 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2-3.0). Combining parental exposures to herbicides from both residential and occupational sources, the elevated risk remained significant (OR = 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-3.1). We observed little association with primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNET) for any of the pesticide classes or exposure sources considered. CONCLUSIONS: Our observation is consistent with a previous literature reporting suggestive associations between parental exposure to pesticides and risk of astrocytoma in offspring but not PNET. However, these findings should be viewed in light of limitations in exposure assessment and effective sample size.
PMID: 19590697 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID: PMC2702394
Parental exposure to pesticides and childhood brain cancer: U.S. Atlantic coast childhood brain cancer study.Shim YK, Mlynarek SP, van Wijngaarden E.
Division of Health Studies, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, Georgia 30341-3737, USA. Yshim@cdc.gov
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19590697?ordinalpos=2&itool=Email.EmailReport.Pubmed_ReportSelector.Pubmed_RVDocSum
BACKGROUND: The etiology of childhood brain cancer remains largely unknown. However, previous studies have yielded suggestive associations with parental pesticide use. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate parental exposure to pesticides at home and on the job in relation to the occurrence of brain cancer in children. METHODS: We included 526 one-to-one-matched case-control pairs. Brain cancer cases were diagnosed at < 10 years of age, and were identified from statewide cancer registries of four U.S. Atlantic Coast states. We selected controls by random digit dialing. We conducted computer-assisted telephone interviews with mothers. Using information on residential pesticide use and jobs held by fathers during the 2-year period before the child's birth, we assessed potential exposure to insecticides, herbicides, and fungicides. For each job, two raters independently classified the probability and intensity of exposure; 421 pairs were available for final analysis. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using conditional logistic regression, after adjustment for maternal education. RESULTS: A significant risk of astrocytoma was associated with exposures to herbicides from residential use (OR = 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2-3.0). Combining parental exposures to herbicides from both residential and occupational sources, the elevated risk remained significant (OR = 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-3.1). We observed little association with primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNET) for any of the pesticide classes or exposure sources considered. CONCLUSIONS: Our observation is consistent with a previous literature reporting suggestive associations between parental exposure to pesticides and risk of astrocytoma in offspring but not PNET. However, these findings should be viewed in light of limitations in exposure assessment and effective sample size.
PMID: 19590697 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID: PMC2702394
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
Monday, September 21, 2009
WHO vaccines UNWANTED why?
BMJ. 2009 Aug 25;339:b3391. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3391. Links
Comment in:
BMJ. 2009;339:b3398.
Willingness of Hong Kong healthcare workers to accept pre-pandemic influenza vaccination at different WHO alert levels: two questionnaire surveys.Chor JS, Ngai KL, Goggins WB, Wong MC, Wong SY, Lee N, Leung TF, Rainer TH, Griffiths S, Chan PK.
School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, School of Public Health, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the acceptability of pre-pandemic influenza vaccination among healthcare workers in public hospitals in Hong Kong and the effect of escalation in the World Health Organization's alert level for an influenza pandemic. DESIGN: Repeated cross sectional studies using self administered, anonymous questionnaires SETTING: Surveys at 31 hospital departments of internal medicine, paediatrics, and emergency medicine under the Hong Kong Hospital Authority from January to March 2009 and in May 2009 PARTICIPANTS: 2255 healthcare workers completed the questionnaires in the two studies. They were doctors, nurses, or allied health professionals working in the public hospital system. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Stated willingness to accept pre-pandemic influenza vaccination (influenza A subtypes H5N1 or H1N1) and its associating factors. RESULTS: The overall willingness to accept pre-pandemic H5N1 vaccine was only 28.4% in the first survey, conducted at WHO influenza pandemic alert phase 3. No significant changes in the level of willingness to accept pre-pandemic H5N1 vaccine were observed despite the escalation to alert phase 5. The willingness to accept pre-pandemic H1N1 vaccine was 47.9% among healthcare workers when the WHO alert level was at phase 5. The most common reasons for an intention to accept were "wish to be protected" and "following health authority's advice." The major barriers identified were fear of side effects and doubts about efficacy. More than half of the respondents thought nurses should be the first priority group to receive the vaccines. The strongest positive associating factors were history of seasonal influenza vaccination and perceived risk of contracting the infection. CONCLUSIONS: The willingness to accept pre-pandemic influenza vaccination was low, and no significant effect was observed with the change in WHO alert level. Further studies are required to elucidate the root cause of the low intention to accept pre-pandemic vaccination.
PMID: 19706937 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Comment in:
BMJ. 2009;339:b3398.
Willingness of Hong Kong healthcare workers to accept pre-pandemic influenza vaccination at different WHO alert levels: two questionnaire surveys.Chor JS, Ngai KL, Goggins WB, Wong MC, Wong SY, Lee N, Leung TF, Rainer TH, Griffiths S, Chan PK.
School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, School of Public Health, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the acceptability of pre-pandemic influenza vaccination among healthcare workers in public hospitals in Hong Kong and the effect of escalation in the World Health Organization's alert level for an influenza pandemic. DESIGN: Repeated cross sectional studies using self administered, anonymous questionnaires SETTING: Surveys at 31 hospital departments of internal medicine, paediatrics, and emergency medicine under the Hong Kong Hospital Authority from January to March 2009 and in May 2009 PARTICIPANTS: 2255 healthcare workers completed the questionnaires in the two studies. They were doctors, nurses, or allied health professionals working in the public hospital system. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Stated willingness to accept pre-pandemic influenza vaccination (influenza A subtypes H5N1 or H1N1) and its associating factors. RESULTS: The overall willingness to accept pre-pandemic H5N1 vaccine was only 28.4% in the first survey, conducted at WHO influenza pandemic alert phase 3. No significant changes in the level of willingness to accept pre-pandemic H5N1 vaccine were observed despite the escalation to alert phase 5. The willingness to accept pre-pandemic H1N1 vaccine was 47.9% among healthcare workers when the WHO alert level was at phase 5. The most common reasons for an intention to accept were "wish to be protected" and "following health authority's advice." The major barriers identified were fear of side effects and doubts about efficacy. More than half of the respondents thought nurses should be the first priority group to receive the vaccines. The strongest positive associating factors were history of seasonal influenza vaccination and perceived risk of contracting the infection. CONCLUSIONS: The willingness to accept pre-pandemic influenza vaccination was low, and no significant effect was observed with the change in WHO alert level. Further studies are required to elucidate the root cause of the low intention to accept pre-pandemic vaccination.
PMID: 19706937 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
WHO Admits to Releasing Pandemic Virus into Population via 'Mock-Up' Vaccines
WHO Admits to Releasing Pandemic Virus into Population via 'Mock-Up' Vaccines
The document on the WHO website linked below states that it is common procedure to release pandemic viruses into the population in order to get a jump ahead of the real pandemic, so as to fast track the vaccine for when it is needed.
In Europe, some manufacturers have conducted advance studies using a so-called "mock-up" vaccine. Mock-up vaccines contain an active ingredient for an influenza virus that has not circulated recently in human populations and thus mimics the novelty of a pandemic virus.
According to the website, “Such advance studies can greatly expedite regulatory approval.”
Sources:
World Health Organization
Dr. Mercola's Comments:
On June 11 the World Health Organization (WHO) raised its swine flu pandemic alert from a 5 to a 6. Phase 6 is the highest level alert, and reflects the speed with which a virus is spreading -- not its severity.
This classification also allows for a vaccine to qualify for a “fast-track” procedure for licensing and approval, and this process is now ongoing for the swine flu vaccine.
What you may not know, however, is that WHO, together with health officials, regulatory authorities and vaccine manufacturers, have been working since 2007 – long before this new “threat” of swine flu emerged – to “explore a broad range of issues surrounding the regulatory approval of pandemic vaccines.”
According to the WHO website:
“Ways were sought to shorten the time between the emergence of a pandemic virus and the availability of safe and effective vaccines.”
One such method used in Europe is to conduct advance studies using a “mock-up” vaccine that contains an active ingredient for an influenza virus that has not circulated recently in human populations.
When testing these mock-up vaccines, it is very possible to release the novel influenza virus into the population, as its purpose is to “mimic the novelty of a pandemic virus” and “greatly expedite regulatory approval.”
Government officials have other tricks up their sleeves to ensure these new, barely tested vaccines easily make it to market as well, such as:
Labeling the vaccine a “strain change” rather than an entirely “new” vaccine. This method states the new vaccine has built on technology used to produce vaccines for seasonal influenza, and the change for the pandemic vaccine is similar to a strain change used to produce a new seasonal vaccine each flu season.
In the United States, vaccine manufacturers are required to submit fewer data if they already have a licensed flu vaccine and will use the same manufacturing process for the pandemic vaccine.
Using a “rolling review procedure.” This allows manufacturers to submit sets of data for regulatory review “as they become available.” In other words, they’re free to distribute the vaccine and then submit the safety data later on.
Would You Want a Fast-Tracked Vaccine Injected Into Your Body?
By very definition, fast-tracked vaccines are those that have received very little safety testing prior to being used. So any time you agree to get one, you are essentially a guinea pig.
Vaccine manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline has actually stated:
"Clinical trials will be limited, due to the need to provide the vaccine to governments as quickly as possible. Additional studies will therefore be required and conducted after the vaccine is made available."
And WHO likewise says:
“Time constraints mean that clinical data at the time when pandemic vaccines are first administered will inevitably be limited. Further testing of safety and effectiveness will need to take place after administration of the vaccine has begun.”
Why would anyone who knows the facts sign up for a vaccine that really needs further safety studies … but won’t receive them until AFTER it’s already been given out? By then it will be too late.
So please realize that if you or your child receive a swine flu vaccine, you will be acting as a TEST subject.
Remember this vaccine will not be made using the methods of the past. In order to speed up the cultivation of the virus and the manufacturing process, they’re using human liver cells instead of chicken eggs. Whether this new procedure is better or worse than the old method, I can’t say … but it’s never been used before and they have not had time to conduct any human testing.
So, it’s a giant game of Russian Roulette that you simply want to avoid.
Nearly all of the vaccines created will also include thimerosal (mercury), and the toxic adjuvant squalene, both of which have been clearly shown to carry significant health risks.
You should know, too, that vaccine makers and federal officials have been rendered immune from lawsuits. Should anything go wrong with this current vaccine they will not have to pay a single cent to anyone!
Who Stands to Benefit From the Swine Flu Pandemic (and Future Pandemics)?
This is the question you need to ask yourself when you hear the media dishing out the latest statistics about the swine flu pandemic.
In the last few days alone, I’ve seen major news outlets warning that come flu season, the swine flu could kill 90,000 Americans and hospitalize 2 million. This sounds a lot like the fear-mongering that went on during the Bird Flu pandemic (that never materialized) back in 2005.
Back then scientists and governments were congratulating themselves for averting a threat that never was by stockpiling worthless vaccines. Now I’m having déjà vu.
In response to this newest swine flu pandemic, what did the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently suggest?
Swine flu shots for all! Of course, what else would you expect?
As the Washington Post reported, CDC said: “As soon as a vaccine is available, try to get it for everyone in your family.”
Well, you might be tempted to do just that if you believe the sensational number of swine flu deaths they’re predicting. But, really, these numbers are not based on facts.
WHO continues to define the severity of the H1N1 virus to be moderate, generally defined as an illness requiring neither hospitalization nor even medical care. Most cases are having MILD symptoms that clear up on their own.
Further, no one really knows for sure just how many cases of swine flu there are, because some countries are no longer confirming them by lab.
In the UK, for example, they now appear to be collecting swine flu data online and via the phone, based on nothing but self-assessment.
So did they really contract the swine flu?
Or did the vast majority of them simply have a case of the sniffles or a seasonal flu bug? Without laboratory confirmation, no one will ever know, but they sure are using those numbers to scare you!
Going back to my original question though, you must ask yourself who stands to benefit from all of this paranoia and hysteria.
Of course you know the answer to this one.
Big Pharma … which stands to gain up to $49 billion a year on the swine flu vaccine alone plus an infinite amount on top of that for future pandemic vaccines.
The vaccine manufacturers would love for every man, woman, and child to heed the CDC’s advice to get vaccinated. But now you know better.
The swine flu is typically a mild illness.
The swine flu vaccine has not been tested for safety or efficacy, but we DO know it will contain harmful additives.
The choice, to me, is obvious. And in the future, anytime a new “pandemic” appears and officials urge you to rush out and get a shot, please remember this article and ask yourself if it’s really you who stands to benefit from their advice.
The document on the WHO website linked below states that it is common procedure to release pandemic viruses into the population in order to get a jump ahead of the real pandemic, so as to fast track the vaccine for when it is needed.
In Europe, some manufacturers have conducted advance studies using a so-called "mock-up" vaccine. Mock-up vaccines contain an active ingredient for an influenza virus that has not circulated recently in human populations and thus mimics the novelty of a pandemic virus.
According to the website, “Such advance studies can greatly expedite regulatory approval.”
Sources:
World Health Organization
Dr. Mercola's Comments:
On June 11 the World Health Organization (WHO) raised its swine flu pandemic alert from a 5 to a 6. Phase 6 is the highest level alert, and reflects the speed with which a virus is spreading -- not its severity.
This classification also allows for a vaccine to qualify for a “fast-track” procedure for licensing and approval, and this process is now ongoing for the swine flu vaccine.
What you may not know, however, is that WHO, together with health officials, regulatory authorities and vaccine manufacturers, have been working since 2007 – long before this new “threat” of swine flu emerged – to “explore a broad range of issues surrounding the regulatory approval of pandemic vaccines.”
According to the WHO website:
“Ways were sought to shorten the time between the emergence of a pandemic virus and the availability of safe and effective vaccines.”
One such method used in Europe is to conduct advance studies using a “mock-up” vaccine that contains an active ingredient for an influenza virus that has not circulated recently in human populations.
When testing these mock-up vaccines, it is very possible to release the novel influenza virus into the population, as its purpose is to “mimic the novelty of a pandemic virus” and “greatly expedite regulatory approval.”
Government officials have other tricks up their sleeves to ensure these new, barely tested vaccines easily make it to market as well, such as:
Labeling the vaccine a “strain change” rather than an entirely “new” vaccine. This method states the new vaccine has built on technology used to produce vaccines for seasonal influenza, and the change for the pandemic vaccine is similar to a strain change used to produce a new seasonal vaccine each flu season.
In the United States, vaccine manufacturers are required to submit fewer data if they already have a licensed flu vaccine and will use the same manufacturing process for the pandemic vaccine.
Using a “rolling review procedure.” This allows manufacturers to submit sets of data for regulatory review “as they become available.” In other words, they’re free to distribute the vaccine and then submit the safety data later on.
Would You Want a Fast-Tracked Vaccine Injected Into Your Body?
By very definition, fast-tracked vaccines are those that have received very little safety testing prior to being used. So any time you agree to get one, you are essentially a guinea pig.
Vaccine manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline has actually stated:
"Clinical trials will be limited, due to the need to provide the vaccine to governments as quickly as possible. Additional studies will therefore be required and conducted after the vaccine is made available."
And WHO likewise says:
“Time constraints mean that clinical data at the time when pandemic vaccines are first administered will inevitably be limited. Further testing of safety and effectiveness will need to take place after administration of the vaccine has begun.”
Why would anyone who knows the facts sign up for a vaccine that really needs further safety studies … but won’t receive them until AFTER it’s already been given out? By then it will be too late.
So please realize that if you or your child receive a swine flu vaccine, you will be acting as a TEST subject.
Remember this vaccine will not be made using the methods of the past. In order to speed up the cultivation of the virus and the manufacturing process, they’re using human liver cells instead of chicken eggs. Whether this new procedure is better or worse than the old method, I can’t say … but it’s never been used before and they have not had time to conduct any human testing.
So, it’s a giant game of Russian Roulette that you simply want to avoid.
Nearly all of the vaccines created will also include thimerosal (mercury), and the toxic adjuvant squalene, both of which have been clearly shown to carry significant health risks.
You should know, too, that vaccine makers and federal officials have been rendered immune from lawsuits. Should anything go wrong with this current vaccine they will not have to pay a single cent to anyone!
Who Stands to Benefit From the Swine Flu Pandemic (and Future Pandemics)?
This is the question you need to ask yourself when you hear the media dishing out the latest statistics about the swine flu pandemic.
In the last few days alone, I’ve seen major news outlets warning that come flu season, the swine flu could kill 90,000 Americans and hospitalize 2 million. This sounds a lot like the fear-mongering that went on during the Bird Flu pandemic (that never materialized) back in 2005.
Back then scientists and governments were congratulating themselves for averting a threat that never was by stockpiling worthless vaccines. Now I’m having déjà vu.
In response to this newest swine flu pandemic, what did the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently suggest?
Swine flu shots for all! Of course, what else would you expect?
As the Washington Post reported, CDC said: “As soon as a vaccine is available, try to get it for everyone in your family.”
Well, you might be tempted to do just that if you believe the sensational number of swine flu deaths they’re predicting. But, really, these numbers are not based on facts.
WHO continues to define the severity of the H1N1 virus to be moderate, generally defined as an illness requiring neither hospitalization nor even medical care. Most cases are having MILD symptoms that clear up on their own.
Further, no one really knows for sure just how many cases of swine flu there are, because some countries are no longer confirming them by lab.
In the UK, for example, they now appear to be collecting swine flu data online and via the phone, based on nothing but self-assessment.
So did they really contract the swine flu?
Or did the vast majority of them simply have a case of the sniffles or a seasonal flu bug? Without laboratory confirmation, no one will ever know, but they sure are using those numbers to scare you!
Going back to my original question though, you must ask yourself who stands to benefit from all of this paranoia and hysteria.
Of course you know the answer to this one.
Big Pharma … which stands to gain up to $49 billion a year on the swine flu vaccine alone plus an infinite amount on top of that for future pandemic vaccines.
The vaccine manufacturers would love for every man, woman, and child to heed the CDC’s advice to get vaccinated. But now you know better.
The swine flu is typically a mild illness.
The swine flu vaccine has not been tested for safety or efficacy, but we DO know it will contain harmful additives.
The choice, to me, is obvious. And in the future, anytime a new “pandemic” appears and officials urge you to rush out and get a shot, please remember this article and ask yourself if it’s really you who stands to benefit from their advice.
Plague may have killed researcher
News:
Plague may have killed researcher
Posted by Jef Akst
[Entry posted at 21st September 2009 02:59 PM GMT]
Comment on this news story
A University of Chicago geneticist studying the genetics of Yersinia pestis, the bacterium that causes plague, may have died from exposure to a weakened strain he worked with in the laboratory.
Wayson stain of Yersinia pestis
Image: Wikimedia commons,
US Center for Disease Control
Malcolm J. Casadaban died on September 13. Autopsy results on Friday (September 18) revealed the presence of the bacteria in the researcher's blood, and suggested no other possible cause of death.
The strain Casadaban worked with lacks the bacteria's harmful components and is therefore not believed to be dangerous to healthy adults. It has been approved by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for routine laboratory studies, and handling it does not require any special safety procedures.
It is possible, however, that this particular strain was different than the CDC-approved strain or that Casadaban had underlying genetic or health conditions that made him more susceptible to infection, virologist and chief of pediatric infections at the University of Chicago Medical Center Kenneth Alexander told the Chicago Sun-Times.
"This death is a tragic loss to our community," James Madara, Dean of the Biological Sciences Division and Pritzker School of Medicine and CEO of the Medical Center, said in a statement. "We are all saddened to lose a valued colleague."
The city and state public health departments and the CDC are investigating the case. Although no one else in contact with the strain, or with Casadaban himself, has reported any symptoms, anyone who might have been exposed is being offered antibiotics as a precaution.
Plague may have killed researcher
Posted by Jef Akst
[Entry posted at 21st September 2009 02:59 PM GMT]
Comment on this news story
A University of Chicago geneticist studying the genetics of Yersinia pestis, the bacterium that causes plague, may have died from exposure to a weakened strain he worked with in the laboratory.
Wayson stain of Yersinia pestis
Image: Wikimedia commons,
US Center for Disease Control
Malcolm J. Casadaban died on September 13. Autopsy results on Friday (September 18) revealed the presence of the bacteria in the researcher's blood, and suggested no other possible cause of death.
The strain Casadaban worked with lacks the bacteria's harmful components and is therefore not believed to be dangerous to healthy adults. It has been approved by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for routine laboratory studies, and handling it does not require any special safety procedures.
It is possible, however, that this particular strain was different than the CDC-approved strain or that Casadaban had underlying genetic or health conditions that made him more susceptible to infection, virologist and chief of pediatric infections at the University of Chicago Medical Center Kenneth Alexander told the Chicago Sun-Times.
"This death is a tragic loss to our community," James Madara, Dean of the Biological Sciences Division and Pritzker School of Medicine and CEO of the Medical Center, said in a statement. "We are all saddened to lose a valued colleague."
The city and state public health departments and the CDC are investigating the case. Although no one else in contact with the strain, or with Casadaban himself, has reported any symptoms, anyone who might have been exposed is being offered antibiotics as a precaution.
Saturday, September 19, 2009
Home Pesticides Linked to Childhood Cancers
Saturday, September 19, 2009 by: S. L. Baker, features writer
Key concepts: Pesticides, Cancer and NaturalNews
View on NaturalPedia: Pesticides, Cancer and NaturalNews
Articles Related to This Article:
• Research Reveals Which Conventional Produce Can be Safely Eaten
• Tracing Pesticides in Children From Ingestion to Elimination
• Home Pesticides Linked to Childhood Cancers
(NaturalNews) Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), a malignant disease of the bone marrow, is the most common cancer diagnosed in children. In fact, nearly one third of all pediatric cancers are cases of ALL. Although this form of cancer can be cured in many cases, in the worst case scenarios the cancer crowds out normal cells in the bone marrow, metastasizes to other organs and takes the lives of about 15 percent of the youngsters it attacks. What triggers so many kids, usually between the ages of three and seven, to develop this cancer in the first place? A new study just published in the August issue of the journal Therapeutic Drug Monitoring raises the suspicion that commonly used household pesticides are the cause.
Previous studies in agricultural areas of the US have shown strong associations between pesticides and childhood cancers but this is the first research conducted in a large, urban area to look at the connection. The study, conducted between January of 2005 and January of 2008, involved 41 pairs of children with ALL and their mothers and a control group of 41 matched pairs of healthy children and their mothers. The volunteer research subjects were all from Lombardi and Children's National Medical Center and lived in the Washington metropolitan area.
Saturday, September 19, 2009 by: S. L. Baker, features writer
Key concepts: Pesticides, Cancer and NaturalNews
View on NaturalPedia: Pesticides, Cancer and NaturalNews
Articles Related to This Article:
• Research Reveals Which Conventional Produce Can be Safely Eaten
• Tracing Pesticides in Children From Ingestion to Elimination
• Home Pesticides Linked to Childhood Cancers
(NaturalNews) Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), a malignant disease of the bone marrow, is the most common cancer diagnosed in children. In fact, nearly one third of all pediatric cancers are cases of ALL. Although this form of cancer can be cured in many cases, in the worst case scenarios the cancer crowds out normal cells in the bone marrow, metastasizes to other organs and takes the lives of about 15 percent of the youngsters it attacks. What triggers so many kids, usually between the ages of three and seven, to develop this cancer in the first place? A new study just published in the August issue of the journal Therapeutic Drug Monitoring raises the suspicion that commonly used household pesticides are the cause.
Previous studies in agricultural areas of the US have shown strong associations between pesticides and childhood cancers but this is the first research conducted in a large, urban area to look at the connection. The study, conducted between January of 2005 and January of 2008, involved 41 pairs of children with ALL and their mothers and a control group of 41 matched pairs of healthy children and their mothers. The volunteer research subjects were all from Lombardi and Children's National Medical Center and lived in the Washington metropolitan area.
Friday, September 18, 2009
Organ transplants: Older organs used, with patients' consent
Organ transplants: Older organs used, with patients' consent
With organs in short supply and need growing -- especially among older patients -- doctors turning to previously discarded organs
By Deborah L. Shelton Tribune reporter
September 18, 2009
At 84 years old, Juan Guano would seem an unlikely candidate for a kidney transplant.But consider this: The kidney he received was 69.Until recently, that kidney would not have been eligible for use in a transplant, because of the age of the deceased donor. But this summer, surgeons at Northwestern Memorial Hospital transplanted it in Guano, who is among the nation's oldest organ recipients.His surgery illustrates two intersecting trends in transplant medicine: People 60 and older represent the fastest-growing age group on transplant waiting lists, and kidneys increasingly are being accepted from older people and donors who had health problems.Organs from these "expanded-criteria donors," which otherwise would be discarded, can give patients such as Guano a new lease on life. Guano, a grandfather of five and great-grandfather of six, beams as he recalls being summoned to the hospital on Father's Day for surgery. The octogenarian had undergone six years of dialysis after his kidneys failed. "I was surprised; I was shocked," Guano said in Spanish as he relaxed in the sunny living room of his art-filled Logan Square home, surrounded by three of his four children. "I still can't believe it."Some experts have expressed ethical concerns about using less-than-perfect kidneys for transplants, stressing the need for full disclosure to the recipients."The primary reason [for using these kidneys] is to try to get the most out of the existing organs to save lives, but another factor is that transplantation is lucrative," said Arthur Caplan, director of the Center for Bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania. "We have a lot of programs doing transplants, clearly more than the supply of organs justify," he added. "That means people want to save lives but they also push hard to try to use organs of somewhat questionable quality. ... Even an 84-year-old needs to know that [surgeons] are talking about a kidney that they had reservations about."More than 16,000 kidney transplants were performed nationwide last year, and the current waiting list for kidneys stands at about 81,000. The use of expanded-criteria kidneys has increased about 30 percent since 2002 and now accounts for about 11 percent of all kidney transplants.Guano got his kidney through Northwestern's Hispanic Transplant Program. Dr. Juan Carlos Caicedo, the program's director, said that of the almost 3,000 kidney transplants performed by Northwestern since 1988, 188 came from donors 65 or older."Part of our informed consent process -- and it's very thorough -- is to explain to every patient all the risks and benefits, and they have the last word," he said.Patients who accept an expanded-criteria kidney have a shorter wait for an organ and are less likely to die than patients on dialysis. In the Illinois region, the average wait for a kidney is five years. A recent study published in the Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology found that about half of kidney transplant candidates older than 60 will die before getting a deceased-donor kidney.
With organs in short supply and need growing -- especially among older patients -- doctors turning to previously discarded organs
By Deborah L. Shelton Tribune reporter
September 18, 2009
At 84 years old, Juan Guano would seem an unlikely candidate for a kidney transplant.But consider this: The kidney he received was 69.Until recently, that kidney would not have been eligible for use in a transplant, because of the age of the deceased donor. But this summer, surgeons at Northwestern Memorial Hospital transplanted it in Guano, who is among the nation's oldest organ recipients.His surgery illustrates two intersecting trends in transplant medicine: People 60 and older represent the fastest-growing age group on transplant waiting lists, and kidneys increasingly are being accepted from older people and donors who had health problems.Organs from these "expanded-criteria donors," which otherwise would be discarded, can give patients such as Guano a new lease on life. Guano, a grandfather of five and great-grandfather of six, beams as he recalls being summoned to the hospital on Father's Day for surgery. The octogenarian had undergone six years of dialysis after his kidneys failed. "I was surprised; I was shocked," Guano said in Spanish as he relaxed in the sunny living room of his art-filled Logan Square home, surrounded by three of his four children. "I still can't believe it."Some experts have expressed ethical concerns about using less-than-perfect kidneys for transplants, stressing the need for full disclosure to the recipients."The primary reason [for using these kidneys] is to try to get the most out of the existing organs to save lives, but another factor is that transplantation is lucrative," said Arthur Caplan, director of the Center for Bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania. "We have a lot of programs doing transplants, clearly more than the supply of organs justify," he added. "That means people want to save lives but they also push hard to try to use organs of somewhat questionable quality. ... Even an 84-year-old needs to know that [surgeons] are talking about a kidney that they had reservations about."More than 16,000 kidney transplants were performed nationwide last year, and the current waiting list for kidneys stands at about 81,000. The use of expanded-criteria kidneys has increased about 30 percent since 2002 and now accounts for about 11 percent of all kidney transplants.Guano got his kidney through Northwestern's Hispanic Transplant Program. Dr. Juan Carlos Caicedo, the program's director, said that of the almost 3,000 kidney transplants performed by Northwestern since 1988, 188 came from donors 65 or older."Part of our informed consent process -- and it's very thorough -- is to explain to every patient all the risks and benefits, and they have the last word," he said.Patients who accept an expanded-criteria kidney have a shorter wait for an organ and are less likely to die than patients on dialysis. In the Illinois region, the average wait for a kidney is five years. A recent study published in the Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology found that about half of kidney transplant candidates older than 60 will die before getting a deceased-donor kidney.
Thursday, September 17, 2009
Former Floridians Jessica Moyal and husband Henri use Mexico's health care program to save money.
Mexico's health care lures Americans
Updated 9/1/2009 1:25 PM | Comments 2,604 | Recommend 92 E-mail | Save | Print |
Enlarge By Rebecca Holzer, USA TODAY
Former Floridians Jessica Moyal and husband Henri use Mexico's health care program to save money.
By Chris Hawley, USA TODAY
MEXICO CITY — It sounds almost too good to be true: a health care plan with no limits, no deductibles, free medicines, tests, X-rays, eyeglasses, even dental work — all for a flat fee of $250 or less a year.
To get it, you just have to move to Mexico.
As the United States debates an overhaul of its health care system, thousands of American retirees in Mexico have quietly found a solution of their own, signing up for the health care plan run by the Mexican Social Security Institute.
The system has flaws, the facilities aren't cutting-edge, and the deal may not last long because the Mexican government said in a recent report that it is "notorious" for losing money. But for now, retirees say they're getting a bargain.
Updated 9/1/2009 1:25 PM | Comments 2,604 | Recommend 92 E-mail | Save | Print |
Enlarge By Rebecca Holzer, USA TODAY
Former Floridians Jessica Moyal and husband Henri use Mexico's health care program to save money.
By Chris Hawley, USA TODAY
MEXICO CITY — It sounds almost too good to be true: a health care plan with no limits, no deductibles, free medicines, tests, X-rays, eyeglasses, even dental work — all for a flat fee of $250 or less a year.
To get it, you just have to move to Mexico.
As the United States debates an overhaul of its health care system, thousands of American retirees in Mexico have quietly found a solution of their own, signing up for the health care plan run by the Mexican Social Security Institute.
The system has flaws, the facilities aren't cutting-edge, and the deal may not last long because the Mexican government said in a recent report that it is "notorious" for losing money. But for now, retirees say they're getting a bargain.
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
We are not going to take it
IT WAS ALWAYS COMING TO THIS ...
... NOW WE HAVE TO DEAL WITH IT
(Faint hearts and shrinking violets need not apply)
By David Icke
I have known throughout the years that I have been warning about the global fascist agenda that what we are about to see was inevitable.
It was obvious that, despite the awakening of so many in the last decade, most people would need to see, touch, smell, hear and taste the fascism before they even began to accept that it was real.
This mass-reluctance to see the signs and act upon them was always going to condemn the population to some levels of the Orwellian control-system before it is eventually dismantled. I stress that it will be dismantled, but not before it has gone a lot further yet.
The question was never whether we would avoid the police/military state. I never had any illusions about that. The question was, and is, how deeply we will allow ourselves to be controlled by this evil and that can be answered by two other questions:
When are enough people going to give their total focus to bringing it to an end and when are the gofer administrators, dark suits and uniforms going to break ranks for the sake of their own families as well as the rest of us?
Well, we're about to find out.
The 'swine flu' vaccine is a line in the sand that will give us a serious fix on where we are in terms of awareness and backbone. If we meekly acquiesce to this most blatant attempt to gain access en masse to our bodies then frankly we deserve what we get.
No one can say they weren't warned, nor that they didn't have access to information exposing what was happening. Anyone who says they didn't know enough to say 'no' to the vaccine is lying to themselves, or looking the other way.
Even some elements of the mainstream media are highlighting the potential dangers despite the myopic perspective from which they view the world.
I have been making the point for years that we are at a fork in the road and we can't sit here gazing at the map anymore, refusing to make a decision. The swine flu vaccine is that decision.
Making the choice to seek freedom and expanded awareness will have its challenges, for sure, but the consequences of choosing ignorance and acquiescence are potentially catastrophic for those who do so.
Something very big is about to go down. I can't say exactly when, but we are talking months, not years. It has all been planned a very long time and it has been put together piece by piece while the population was watching the game, the game show or the soap, and dismissing those warning about what was to come as 'conspiracy nuts'.
You can always see the big picture in its component parts and I have kept a close eye on a council building in the last few weeks called the Westridge Centre, just down the road from me on the Isle of Wight in England.
Builders have been working there through the summer converting the top floor with a strict deadline of July to finish the work and they were told they could not miss that deadline under any circumstances.
They became suspicious when different groups of builders were brought in to do different phases and this meant that no single group knew what they were actually building. In the final stages, the local builders were replaced by men in unmarked white vans, according to people who work in the building.
It was clear from putting the dots together that this was something to do with the 'swine flu pandemic' that the crazies plan to engineer in the next few months.
I asked the council under the Freedom of Information Act what was going on at Westridge and what was being created there. A few days ago came the reply and it was no surprise whatsoever, just confirmation of what by now is obvious:
Dear Mr Icke
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST REGARDING PLANNED USE OF UPPER FLOOR OF THE WESTRIDGE CENTRE, NEAR RYDE - CRM REFERENCE: IW09/8/24953
Thank you for your request for information dated 17th August 2009 which, as you are requesting information under The Freedom of Information Act, has been passed to me as the Departmental Information Guardian for the Strategic Asset Management Service.
I can confirm that the works being undertaken at the upper floor of the Westridge Centre are to enable proper utilisation of the accommodation for Council office use and as a Disaster Recovery Centre. The works have included creating better open plan accommodation, plus the installation of a lift and accessible toilets in order to comply with the Disability Discrimination Act.
What a coincidence that they should choose this time to establish a 'Disaster Recovery Centre' with a strict deadline for completion, but, of course, it is not a coincidence at all. A similar centre had been established in every county of the UK. Sources at the Isle of Wight's only airport with a tarmac runway are also reporting a sudden increase in military activity going too and fro in helicopters.
This may be just a small island off the south coast of England, but its very size allows you to see things that would be lost in a major town or city. What we are experiencing here is a smaller version of what is happening covertly everywhere - Europe, America, Canada, and so on. It is the microcosm of the macrocosm.
The H1N1 virus is called 'swine flu', but it is a laboratory-created combination of swine flu, bird flu and seasonal flu designed to justify a global programme of mass vaccinations that will inoculate a strengthened version of the virus with the intent of culling the population, short and long term.
Researchers say that the flu strain can be traced to the work of Dr Jeffrey Taubenberger and a team of geneticists and microbiologists at the US Army Institute of Pathology at Ft. Detrick, Maryland, who used supercomputers to map, or 'reverse-engineer', the flu strain that killed tens of millions in 1918.
It is claimed that this virus was then given to the drug giant, Novartis, in Basel, Switzerland, which was once a component part of the Nazi pharmaceutical cartel, I G Farben. It was Farben that ran the concentration camp at Auschwitz and the company was fundamental to the Nazi war machine.
If it is 'swine flu', why are pigs not affected in any way? We were led to believe that it broke out in Mexico on a pig farm, but, apart from the idiotic Egyptian government ordering an immediate mass culling of pigs, the porkies have never got a mention since. If it is not swine flu, which it isn't, how could it have emerged from a pig farm in Mexico?
The United Nations food agency said there was no justification for culling pigs or limiting their movements as there was no evidence the virus affected pigs or made their meat dangerous. Yes, because it is nothing to do with pigs - it has been made in a laboratory.
Oh yeah? So where are the pigs?
The UK government has estimated that some 65,000 people will die in this country from 'swine flu' this winter. How can they make such estimation when the symptoms of 'swine flu' have been extremely mild for most people and the numbers have been falling rapidly in the late summer despite efforts to fix the figures to present a false picture?
The number of people claimed to have been infected with 'swine flu' has been massively inflated by false diagnosis and that is why the World Heath Organization said that it should be diagnosed by symptoms and not by testing.
As a result, we have had children dying from meningitis that was diagnosed as 'swine flu' and others suffering from diseases like pneumonia that they were told without testing was 'swine flu' by untrained, unqualified members of the public working at swine flu 'call centres' ludicrously set up by the British government. Some of those diagnosing over the phone are as young as 16.
The call centres, by the way, were being organised long before 'swine flu' emerged in Mexico in April. Like I say, all of this has been planned way in advance.
The authorities have been telling us what is planned ever since the laboratory-created 'swine flu' was released in Mexico. Government and medical representatives in Britain, France, the United States and elsewhere warned very early on that the H1N1 strain 'could strengthen' in the Autumn/Fall and that is precisely what they plan to make it do.
They want to have access to every human body on the planet to inject a range of poisons, immune-system destroyers and almost certainly nanotechnology microchips, and at the moment they are not going to achieve that.
There is far too much scepticism among the public about both the need for the H1N1 vaccine and its safety. As things stand, there is going to be an enormous number of people who refuse to be vaccinated or have their children vaccinated.
A poll of British doctors found that half of them were not going to have the vaccine and another poll suggested that 30 per cent of nurses were taking a similar stand.
This is all thanks to a gathering awakening to the reality of the world we are experiencing and the fantastic efforts of so many to spread the truth about 'swine flu' and the vaccine on the Internet.
In short, the elite families behind the swine flu conspiracy, notably the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers, are not going to get what they want as things are at present. They know that and so the plan is to change 'as things are'.
These deeply sick people plan to increase the strength of the 'swine flu' virus to impose their self-fulfilling 'prophecy' about casualties and dramatically increase the fear that is designed to break the resistance of the population to accepting the vaccine for themselves and their families.
The World Health Organization, a Rothschild-Rockefeller creation, has insisted that the vaccine contain live 'swine flu' virus, and it is highly likely that this will spread the disease through the very vaccinations that are supposed - supposed - to protect people from it.
This can be done by direct inoculation of the virus and through a phenomenon known as 'shedding' when the virus passes through the vaccine recipient via faeces, urine, saliva and mucous membranes and onto other people. Oral polio vaccine was withdrawn in the US because of this very problem, but it is still used in so-called developing countries.
Live oral polio vaccination can give people polio in the form of a disease called
vaccine-associated paralytic polio, and live polio virus has been found in the faeces of babies for up to six weeks after vaccination.
Quite a thought when you consider that children are being given around 25 vaccinations and combinations by the age of two. Anyone fancy changing a nappy?
Genetic material from the measles virus has been found in urine up to two weeks after vaccination; live rubella virus has been discovered in the nose and throat for up to 28 days after the vaccine was injected and can be passed on through breast milk; vaccine-induced chickenpox has been shown to replicate in the lung and can be passed on through various means; FluMist vaccine sprayed into the nose contains live influenza viruses and it has been proved that they can be passed on by a recipient to other people.
They say that non-vaccinated children are a danger to the vaccinated, but we can see that, in fact, the opposite is the case.
Given this background, what more effective way can there be than to circulate a strengthened 'swine flu' virus than by a mass vaccination programme? This, it is clear, is what they plan to do - plus much more besides. They have other means of circulating the virus, too.
The World Health Organization announced in July:
'In view of the anticipated limited vaccine availability at global level and the potential need to protect against "drifted" strains of virus, it is recommended that promoting production and use of vaccines such as those that are formulated with oil-in-water adjuvants and live attenuated influenza vaccines is important.'
This statement was merely taken from a script written a long time ago and delivered on cue.
The term 'attenuated' means that the virus is reduced in strength, but that does not stop it infecting the vaccine recipient or being spread among the population. The 'oil-in-water adjuvants' are officially used to increase the effects of a vaccine by stimulating a bigger response from the immune system.
An adjuvant being used in the 'swine flu' vaccine is called squalene and this has the potential to increase the impact of the 'attenuated' live 'swine flu' virus and cause havoc in many other ways. Dr Joseph Mercola at Mercola.com explains the effect of squalene:
'Your immune system recognizes squalene as an oil molecule native to your body. It is found throughout your nervous system and brain. In fact, you can consume squalene in olive oil and not only will your immune system recognize it, you will also reap the benefits of its antioxidant properties.
The difference between "good" and "bad" squalene is the route by which it enters your body. Injection is an abnormal route of entry which incites your immune system to attack all the squalene in your body, not just the vaccine adjuvant.
Your immune system will attempt to destroy the molecule wherever it finds it, including in places where it occurs naturally, and where it is vital to the health of your nervous system.'
Squalene in anthrax vaccine has been fundamentally connected to the 'mysterious' outbreak of Gulf War syndrome among Gulf War veterans after 1991. A study conducted at Tulane Medical School found that virtually every soldier with Gulf War syndrome had antibodies to squalene, showing that their immune systems had reacted to it. The troops who did not have Gulf War syndrome had no anti-bodies to squalene.
Dr Viera Scheibner, a former principle research scientist in New South Wales, Australia, spent many years investigating the destructive effects of vaccines. She said of squalene:
'... this adjuvant [squalene] contributed to the cascade of reactions called "Gulf War syndrome," documented in the soldiers involved in the Gulf War. The symptoms they developed included arthritis, fibromyalgia, lymphadenopathy, rashes, photosensitive rashes, malar rashes, chronic fatigue, chronic headaches, abnormal body hair loss, non-healing skin lesions, aphthous ulcers, dizziness, weakness, memory loss, seizures, mood changes, neuropsychiatric problems, anti-thyroid effects, anaemia, elevated ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate), systemic lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, ALS (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis), Raynaud's phenomenon, Sjorgren's syndrome, chronic diarrhoea, night sweats and low-grade fevers.'
The potential dangers of 'swine flu' vaccine can be seen with the experience in the United States after the mass vaccination programme in 1976. This was 'justified' by the death of a single person, an Army recruit at Fort Dix in New Jersey. A panic was then generated on the basis that he had died from a swine flu strain allegedly similar to that which killed tens of millions in 1918 (another vaccine-created disaster - see item at the end of this article).
It was later established that the recruit died because 'normal' flu had turned to pneumonia and this was compounded by dehydration and heavy physical work. He collapsed on a morning run. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) admitted that not a single case of swine flu was confirmed.
The 1976 scare-them-shitless campaign
Mass vaccinations for 'swine flu' followed the death of the Army recruit and led to hundreds of people developing Guillain-Barre syndrome, an autoimmune disorder affecting the nervous system that triggers paralysis in legs, upper limbs and face, and an inability to breathe. At least 25 died and, longer term, the figure would have been far higher.
The drug companies and the World Health Organization (WHO) are telling us that the 'swine flu' vaccine is safe when it has been revealed that 600 senior neurologists in the UK were sent a confidential letter by government health officials warning of a coming increase in Guillain-Barre syndrome as a result of the 'swine flu' vaccinations.
The letter came from the Health Protection Agency, the official body that oversees public health, and warned neurologists 'to be alert for an increase in a brain disorder called Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS), which could be triggered by the ... vaccine'. A senior neurologist quoted by the London Daily Mail said: 'I would not have the swine flu jab because of the GBS risk'.
Great, eh? The government 'Health Protection' Agency tells 600 neurologists about the expected effects - but not the public.
The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) in the United States have officially predicted 30,000 serious and potentially fatal reactions to the H1N1 vaccine while at the same time insisting that it be effective in only three out of every ten recipients. The requirement is even less for people over 65.
You might say that this was madness and it is on one level, because the people behind the global conspiracy are by any standards utterly insane. It is not bureaucratic madness, however, except in the way it plays out through the useful idiots. At its core, it is cold, calculated mass murder-type madness.
As I have been stressing for years, the same families, led by the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers, created and control the World Health Organization, the Centers for Disease Control and the Food and Drug Administration (and their equivalent around the world), and the pharmaceutical cartel, or Big Pharma. These bodies may appear to be unconnected, but they are all on the same team answering to the same masters.
Executives from drug giants Baxter International, Novartis and GlaxoSmithKline sat on the World Health Organization's vaccine advisory board that recommended mass vaccinations in July. They all move as one unit.
Baxter International of Illinois was exposed in February for contaminating vaccine materials with live bird flu virus sent to 18 locations. The virus was supplied by the World Health Organization and was mixed with seasonal flu viruses to produce a potentially deadly combination.
This 'mistake' - yeah, right - was only discovered when a laboratory in the Czech Republic tested the concoction on ferrets and they all died.
Now tens of billions of public dollars, pounds and euros are being handed to sinister corporations like Baxter International and Novartis to mass vaccinate the global population. No matter what the economic situation there is never a shortage of money when the agenda is involved, be it for wars of mass slaughter or vaccination programmes of mass slaughter. Killing people is big business - ask the weapons producers.
Austrian journalist Jane Bürgermeister has filed criminal charges with the FBI against the World Health Organization, United Nations, Barack Obama, a Rockefeller, a Rothschild, and others, after she uncovered a plot to cull the population with the 'swine flu' vaccine.
She said that bird flu and swine flu have been developed in laboratories and released on the public with the aim of mass murder through vaccination. Her filed document, Bioterrorism Evidence, correctly claims that the World Health Organization, United Nations and vaccine-makers such as Baxter International and Novartis are part of a single system under the control of a core criminal group that has 'funded the development, manufacturing and release of artificial viruses in order to justify mass vaccinations with a bioweapon substance in order to eliminate the people of the USA, and so gain control of the assets, resources etc. of North America'.
Bürgermeister's 'core criminal group' is the network of interbreeding families, like the Rothschilds and Rockefellers, known as the Illuminati. The plot she talks about is, of course, worldwide and not just in the United States.
Novartis and Baxter International applied for patents for this vaccine long before the engineered 'outbreak' in Mexico in April. Novartis made its provisional patent application in 2005 and it was approved in February this year. Baxter International applied for its patent in August 2008 and it came through in March, just before the virus was released in Mexico to start the whole thing rolling.
The sequence is this: patent the vaccine; release the laboratory-created 'swine flu' virus in Mexico; use the controlled and pathetic media to cause panic in the population over 'deadly' swine flu; tell the World Health Organization to declare a pandemic and demand vaccination for the entire human race; spread a strengthened virus in the vaccine and through other means to cause terror and hysteria to ensure that people line up for their jab of live virus. Oh yes, and get governments to give you blanket immunity from prosecution for the effects of your vaccine.
Drug companies would not coldly set out to kill and maim vast numbers of people? What?? That's their job. They have been doing it year after year since Big Pharma was created by John D Rockefeller, an asset of the Rothschild dynasty.
Shane Ellison was a medicinal chemist for drug companies Array BioPharma and Eli Lilly, but resigned in disgust at what he saw on the inside. He now promotes natural remedies under the title 'The People's Chemist'. He said in an article this week:
'As a young chemist working in the chemistry labs of corporate America, I watched as they promoted cancer causing drugs as anti-cancer remedies (tamoxifen). I also witnessed the pharmaceutically compliant media convince the world that depression was a disease and you needed the so-called antidepressant drug Prozac™ to treat it. I began to wonder, "How gullible are the masses?" The reaction to the swine flu scare answered this.'
American researcher Patrick Jordan uncovered World Health Organization memos dating from 1972 explaining how to kill people with vaccines by undermining the immune system, injecting viruses and creating an immune response so enormous that it kills the body. This is known as the cytokine storm.
The initial spread of Aids in the United States matched the locations of vaccination trials for Hepatitis B in homosexual communities and the initial outbreak in Africa mirrored the locations of mass smallpox vaccinations ordered by the World Health Organization with vaccine reportedly supplied by Novartis.
Big Pharma and the World Health Organization are killing machines and the cemeteries of the world are full of their victims. Gullibility can indeed be lethal.
Fear and gullibility - babes-in-arms syndrome, as I call it - will ensure that enormous numbers of unquestioning dupes race to the vaccine centres in the coming weeks and months. But the world is a lot wiser to what is going on that it was five, ten or twenty years ago and there are now very large numbers of people who can see through the lies.
This is where the police state comes in and the plan is to make the vaccine compulsory. We are already moving fast in that direction and what is now emerging in American states like Massachusetts is the blueprint for everywhere.
'Sir, we found one that's not had the shot ...'
The Massachusetts Senate has passed the flu pandemic bill S 2028 that imposes a state of fascism whenever the governor decides to do so in the wake of a flu pandemic - like, you know, the one they plan to engineer. The bill authorises the state health commissioner, law enforcement, and medical personnel to:
* Vaccinate the population
* Enter private property with no warrants
* Quarantine people against their will
* Arrest without a warrant anyone a police officer deems has violated an isolation or quarantine order
* Jail or fine at the rate of $1,000 a day anyone in such violation
Similar isolation orders are being implemented in Florida, Washington, Iowa and North Carolina. The rest will follow and the same is planned all over the world - if we stand for it.
An internal French government document has come to light detailing covert plans to vaccinate everyone in France without exception starting on September 28th and continuing until January. The document is dated August 21st and is signed by Rosaylne Batchelot-Narquin, the French Health Minister, and Brice Hortefeux, the French Minister of Interior and Overseas Territories.
It has been sent to the heads of the country's 'defence zones', law enforcement and regional health authorities. Some of its main points are:
* Medical personnel, medical students and medical army personnel can be compelled to administer vaccines or face penalties
* 'Vaccination centers' to be established in 'secure facilities' in every region and no medical establishments will be involved, nor any general practitioners
* Schoolchildren to be vaccinated at school by special mobile pandemic vaccination teams
* The public are not to be 'informed' until the end of September
Similar documents will be circulating in all 194 member states of the World Health Organization because all this is centrally coordinated.
French President Nicolas Sarkozy ... Illuminati to his fingertips.
Documents and statements that have emerged over the years make it clear that the Illuminati cabal and their bloodline families want to dramatically reduce the global population to perhaps as low as 500 million - more than six billion fewer than at present.
The 'elite' families behind the mass 'swine flu' vaccinations are the origin of the 'master race' eugenics movement with Adolf Hitler their most high-profile advocate. The Rockfeller family, who are Rothschild subordinates, financed Hitler's 'race purity' expert, Ernst Rudin, at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute in Munich, and many other leading eugenicists.
Rudin was president of the International Federation of Eugenic Organizations and a global figure in the eugenics movement which advocated - still advocates - the removal of 'inferior' people through segregation, sterilisation and extermination to create a 'better' or 'master' race.
The population cullers are the driving force behind the swine flu vaccination programme. The President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology in the United States warned this week that swine flu was a 'threat to our nation', estimated that 90,000 could die, and said everyone must be vaccinated.
This Council of Advisors is chaired by John P Holdren, the director of the White House Office of Science and Technology. Holdren co-wrote a book in 1977, called Ecoscience, that details proposals to mass sterilise the population by medicating food and the water supply and to impose a regime of forced abortion, government seizure of children born out of wedlock and mandatory bodily implants designed to prevent pregnancy.
Holdren wrote the book with those infamous population-control extremists, Paul and Anne Ehrlich, and have no doubt that such sterlisation plans have long been implemented - sperm counts have dropped by a third since 1989 and by half in 50 years.
Holdren has been desperately trying to deny that he supports forced population control after the content of Ecoscience was recently exposed. This is rather difficult, however, when you have co-written a 1,000-page textbook advocating exactly that.
The plan is to introduce compulsory vaccination and they are moving there step by step with the announcement this week that it will be mandatory for all military personnel starting in October.
Public resistance to compulsory vaccination makes even more sense of the story I revealed in 2008 about how designated police officers in each county of the United Kingdom were preparing for a 'coming war' and mass public protests in the streets. I have no doubt that a war is on the agenda, too, at some point, but it is clear that this preparation also involves the public reaction to compulsory vaccinations. This, in turn, connects with the establishment of 'Disaster Recovery Centres' in each county.
One of these designated 'prepare for war' police officers told his friend (who contacted me) that they were preparing for the military to be on the streets with the police to deal with mass protests.
Other uniform professions, like private security guards, traffic wardens and CCTV operators, would perform the other duties of the police while they were dealing with the protests, the police officer said.
This is happening with traffic wardens, who once dealt only with parking offences, now renamed 'civil enforcement officers' and given powers that were exclusively those of the police. The UK government also announced a new designation called an 'accredited person' - private security guards, CCTV operators etc., who will be given some of the powers of police officers.
The Pentagon has recently asked Congress for clearance to post nearly 400,000 military personnel throughout the United States in the event of an 'emergency' and 'major disaster' under the control of US Northern Command, or 'NorthCom'.
In truth, large numbers of these troops will not even be American. The military has been amassing an army of foreign troops to patrol the streets of America in the knowledge that many American soldiers will be reluctant to fire on their own people.
NorthCom is the domestic military operation created as a Problem-Reaction-Solution after 9/11 to 'protect' the 'homeland' from 'terrorists' (We the People). NorthCom is also responsible for 'theatre security cooperation' with Canada and Mexico. These people love their Orwellian language.
General Victor Renuart, the head of NorthCom, has produced plans for the miltary to work with FEMA, the Illuminati's truly evil Federal Emergency Management Agency, in the event of a major swine flu outbreak and is awaiting approval from Bush and Obama 'Defense' Secretary, Robert Gates. It will, of course, be granted.
Renuart gave public testimony in March, a month before the 'swine flu' outbreak in Mexico, that NorthCom had prepared for a flu outbreak originating in Mexico. He said NorthCom was focused on 'developing and improving procedures to respond to potentially catastrophic events such as pandemic influenza outbreak ...' Was he a prophet? No, he knew what was coming.
I can't say when all this will kick-off in earnest, but you can see the pieces being rapidly moved into place hour by hour. The vaccinations will be underway in weeks and everything will follow from that as the months unfold.
We need to be strong and we need to be unified. What does someone's religion, colour, income bracket or sexuality matter when you are faced with this satanic agenda? This is not about killing and maiming white people, black people, Muslims, Hindus or Jews. It is an attack on the health and freedoms of all of us, so we must meet that threat as One.
We need to come together in mutual support with unbreakable determination and a backbone that will not wilt.
No matter what the intimidation we must refuse the vaccination for ourselves and our families and make it as difficult as possible for the authorities to impose their will. If people react with violent protest, they will be handing all the aces to the police state. It is not a violent response that we need, but a calm and peaceful mass campaign of non-cooperation.
A system run by a few cannot function if the masses will not cooperate with it.
Calmness is essential or we stop thinking straight and never was there a more important time to think straight than in the months and years ahead before this control system is dismantled.
Hey, and you in the middle and lower ranks of administration in governments and their agencies; you in uniform, be it the military, police, whatever ... What the hell are you doing? You have children and grandchildren, too. What the hell are you doing?
Wake up, grow up, get informed and start to break ranks before you enforce a prison-state on your own families.
This is no time for faint hearts ... we came to sort out this fascist nonsense and the time will come when we will. Let us meet that challenge - look it in the eye - instead of running for cover.
One line sums it up ...
HUMAN RACE
GET OFF YOUR
KNEES.
Come on, let's go.
... NOW WE HAVE TO DEAL WITH IT
(Faint hearts and shrinking violets need not apply)
By David Icke
I have known throughout the years that I have been warning about the global fascist agenda that what we are about to see was inevitable.
It was obvious that, despite the awakening of so many in the last decade, most people would need to see, touch, smell, hear and taste the fascism before they even began to accept that it was real.
This mass-reluctance to see the signs and act upon them was always going to condemn the population to some levels of the Orwellian control-system before it is eventually dismantled. I stress that it will be dismantled, but not before it has gone a lot further yet.
The question was never whether we would avoid the police/military state. I never had any illusions about that. The question was, and is, how deeply we will allow ourselves to be controlled by this evil and that can be answered by two other questions:
When are enough people going to give their total focus to bringing it to an end and when are the gofer administrators, dark suits and uniforms going to break ranks for the sake of their own families as well as the rest of us?
Well, we're about to find out.
The 'swine flu' vaccine is a line in the sand that will give us a serious fix on where we are in terms of awareness and backbone. If we meekly acquiesce to this most blatant attempt to gain access en masse to our bodies then frankly we deserve what we get.
No one can say they weren't warned, nor that they didn't have access to information exposing what was happening. Anyone who says they didn't know enough to say 'no' to the vaccine is lying to themselves, or looking the other way.
Even some elements of the mainstream media are highlighting the potential dangers despite the myopic perspective from which they view the world.
I have been making the point for years that we are at a fork in the road and we can't sit here gazing at the map anymore, refusing to make a decision. The swine flu vaccine is that decision.
Making the choice to seek freedom and expanded awareness will have its challenges, for sure, but the consequences of choosing ignorance and acquiescence are potentially catastrophic for those who do so.
Something very big is about to go down. I can't say exactly when, but we are talking months, not years. It has all been planned a very long time and it has been put together piece by piece while the population was watching the game, the game show or the soap, and dismissing those warning about what was to come as 'conspiracy nuts'.
You can always see the big picture in its component parts and I have kept a close eye on a council building in the last few weeks called the Westridge Centre, just down the road from me on the Isle of Wight in England.
Builders have been working there through the summer converting the top floor with a strict deadline of July to finish the work and they were told they could not miss that deadline under any circumstances.
They became suspicious when different groups of builders were brought in to do different phases and this meant that no single group knew what they were actually building. In the final stages, the local builders were replaced by men in unmarked white vans, according to people who work in the building.
It was clear from putting the dots together that this was something to do with the 'swine flu pandemic' that the crazies plan to engineer in the next few months.
I asked the council under the Freedom of Information Act what was going on at Westridge and what was being created there. A few days ago came the reply and it was no surprise whatsoever, just confirmation of what by now is obvious:
Dear Mr Icke
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST REGARDING PLANNED USE OF UPPER FLOOR OF THE WESTRIDGE CENTRE, NEAR RYDE - CRM REFERENCE: IW09/8/24953
Thank you for your request for information dated 17th August 2009 which, as you are requesting information under The Freedom of Information Act, has been passed to me as the Departmental Information Guardian for the Strategic Asset Management Service.
I can confirm that the works being undertaken at the upper floor of the Westridge Centre are to enable proper utilisation of the accommodation for Council office use and as a Disaster Recovery Centre. The works have included creating better open plan accommodation, plus the installation of a lift and accessible toilets in order to comply with the Disability Discrimination Act.
What a coincidence that they should choose this time to establish a 'Disaster Recovery Centre' with a strict deadline for completion, but, of course, it is not a coincidence at all. A similar centre had been established in every county of the UK. Sources at the Isle of Wight's only airport with a tarmac runway are also reporting a sudden increase in military activity going too and fro in helicopters.
This may be just a small island off the south coast of England, but its very size allows you to see things that would be lost in a major town or city. What we are experiencing here is a smaller version of what is happening covertly everywhere - Europe, America, Canada, and so on. It is the microcosm of the macrocosm.
The H1N1 virus is called 'swine flu', but it is a laboratory-created combination of swine flu, bird flu and seasonal flu designed to justify a global programme of mass vaccinations that will inoculate a strengthened version of the virus with the intent of culling the population, short and long term.
Researchers say that the flu strain can be traced to the work of Dr Jeffrey Taubenberger and a team of geneticists and microbiologists at the US Army Institute of Pathology at Ft. Detrick, Maryland, who used supercomputers to map, or 'reverse-engineer', the flu strain that killed tens of millions in 1918.
It is claimed that this virus was then given to the drug giant, Novartis, in Basel, Switzerland, which was once a component part of the Nazi pharmaceutical cartel, I G Farben. It was Farben that ran the concentration camp at Auschwitz and the company was fundamental to the Nazi war machine.
If it is 'swine flu', why are pigs not affected in any way? We were led to believe that it broke out in Mexico on a pig farm, but, apart from the idiotic Egyptian government ordering an immediate mass culling of pigs, the porkies have never got a mention since. If it is not swine flu, which it isn't, how could it have emerged from a pig farm in Mexico?
The United Nations food agency said there was no justification for culling pigs or limiting their movements as there was no evidence the virus affected pigs or made their meat dangerous. Yes, because it is nothing to do with pigs - it has been made in a laboratory.
Oh yeah? So where are the pigs?
The UK government has estimated that some 65,000 people will die in this country from 'swine flu' this winter. How can they make such estimation when the symptoms of 'swine flu' have been extremely mild for most people and the numbers have been falling rapidly in the late summer despite efforts to fix the figures to present a false picture?
The number of people claimed to have been infected with 'swine flu' has been massively inflated by false diagnosis and that is why the World Heath Organization said that it should be diagnosed by symptoms and not by testing.
As a result, we have had children dying from meningitis that was diagnosed as 'swine flu' and others suffering from diseases like pneumonia that they were told without testing was 'swine flu' by untrained, unqualified members of the public working at swine flu 'call centres' ludicrously set up by the British government. Some of those diagnosing over the phone are as young as 16.
The call centres, by the way, were being organised long before 'swine flu' emerged in Mexico in April. Like I say, all of this has been planned way in advance.
The authorities have been telling us what is planned ever since the laboratory-created 'swine flu' was released in Mexico. Government and medical representatives in Britain, France, the United States and elsewhere warned very early on that the H1N1 strain 'could strengthen' in the Autumn/Fall and that is precisely what they plan to make it do.
They want to have access to every human body on the planet to inject a range of poisons, immune-system destroyers and almost certainly nanotechnology microchips, and at the moment they are not going to achieve that.
There is far too much scepticism among the public about both the need for the H1N1 vaccine and its safety. As things stand, there is going to be an enormous number of people who refuse to be vaccinated or have their children vaccinated.
A poll of British doctors found that half of them were not going to have the vaccine and another poll suggested that 30 per cent of nurses were taking a similar stand.
This is all thanks to a gathering awakening to the reality of the world we are experiencing and the fantastic efforts of so many to spread the truth about 'swine flu' and the vaccine on the Internet.
In short, the elite families behind the swine flu conspiracy, notably the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers, are not going to get what they want as things are at present. They know that and so the plan is to change 'as things are'.
These deeply sick people plan to increase the strength of the 'swine flu' virus to impose their self-fulfilling 'prophecy' about casualties and dramatically increase the fear that is designed to break the resistance of the population to accepting the vaccine for themselves and their families.
The World Health Organization, a Rothschild-Rockefeller creation, has insisted that the vaccine contain live 'swine flu' virus, and it is highly likely that this will spread the disease through the very vaccinations that are supposed - supposed - to protect people from it.
This can be done by direct inoculation of the virus and through a phenomenon known as 'shedding' when the virus passes through the vaccine recipient via faeces, urine, saliva and mucous membranes and onto other people. Oral polio vaccine was withdrawn in the US because of this very problem, but it is still used in so-called developing countries.
Live oral polio vaccination can give people polio in the form of a disease called
vaccine-associated paralytic polio, and live polio virus has been found in the faeces of babies for up to six weeks after vaccination.
Quite a thought when you consider that children are being given around 25 vaccinations and combinations by the age of two. Anyone fancy changing a nappy?
Genetic material from the measles virus has been found in urine up to two weeks after vaccination; live rubella virus has been discovered in the nose and throat for up to 28 days after the vaccine was injected and can be passed on through breast milk; vaccine-induced chickenpox has been shown to replicate in the lung and can be passed on through various means; FluMist vaccine sprayed into the nose contains live influenza viruses and it has been proved that they can be passed on by a recipient to other people.
They say that non-vaccinated children are a danger to the vaccinated, but we can see that, in fact, the opposite is the case.
Given this background, what more effective way can there be than to circulate a strengthened 'swine flu' virus than by a mass vaccination programme? This, it is clear, is what they plan to do - plus much more besides. They have other means of circulating the virus, too.
The World Health Organization announced in July:
'In view of the anticipated limited vaccine availability at global level and the potential need to protect against "drifted" strains of virus, it is recommended that promoting production and use of vaccines such as those that are formulated with oil-in-water adjuvants and live attenuated influenza vaccines is important.'
This statement was merely taken from a script written a long time ago and delivered on cue.
The term 'attenuated' means that the virus is reduced in strength, but that does not stop it infecting the vaccine recipient or being spread among the population. The 'oil-in-water adjuvants' are officially used to increase the effects of a vaccine by stimulating a bigger response from the immune system.
An adjuvant being used in the 'swine flu' vaccine is called squalene and this has the potential to increase the impact of the 'attenuated' live 'swine flu' virus and cause havoc in many other ways. Dr Joseph Mercola at Mercola.com explains the effect of squalene:
'Your immune system recognizes squalene as an oil molecule native to your body. It is found throughout your nervous system and brain. In fact, you can consume squalene in olive oil and not only will your immune system recognize it, you will also reap the benefits of its antioxidant properties.
The difference between "good" and "bad" squalene is the route by which it enters your body. Injection is an abnormal route of entry which incites your immune system to attack all the squalene in your body, not just the vaccine adjuvant.
Your immune system will attempt to destroy the molecule wherever it finds it, including in places where it occurs naturally, and where it is vital to the health of your nervous system.'
Squalene in anthrax vaccine has been fundamentally connected to the 'mysterious' outbreak of Gulf War syndrome among Gulf War veterans after 1991. A study conducted at Tulane Medical School found that virtually every soldier with Gulf War syndrome had antibodies to squalene, showing that their immune systems had reacted to it. The troops who did not have Gulf War syndrome had no anti-bodies to squalene.
Dr Viera Scheibner, a former principle research scientist in New South Wales, Australia, spent many years investigating the destructive effects of vaccines. She said of squalene:
'... this adjuvant [squalene] contributed to the cascade of reactions called "Gulf War syndrome," documented in the soldiers involved in the Gulf War. The symptoms they developed included arthritis, fibromyalgia, lymphadenopathy, rashes, photosensitive rashes, malar rashes, chronic fatigue, chronic headaches, abnormal body hair loss, non-healing skin lesions, aphthous ulcers, dizziness, weakness, memory loss, seizures, mood changes, neuropsychiatric problems, anti-thyroid effects, anaemia, elevated ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate), systemic lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, ALS (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis), Raynaud's phenomenon, Sjorgren's syndrome, chronic diarrhoea, night sweats and low-grade fevers.'
The potential dangers of 'swine flu' vaccine can be seen with the experience in the United States after the mass vaccination programme in 1976. This was 'justified' by the death of a single person, an Army recruit at Fort Dix in New Jersey. A panic was then generated on the basis that he had died from a swine flu strain allegedly similar to that which killed tens of millions in 1918 (another vaccine-created disaster - see item at the end of this article).
It was later established that the recruit died because 'normal' flu had turned to pneumonia and this was compounded by dehydration and heavy physical work. He collapsed on a morning run. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) admitted that not a single case of swine flu was confirmed.
The 1976 scare-them-shitless campaign
Mass vaccinations for 'swine flu' followed the death of the Army recruit and led to hundreds of people developing Guillain-Barre syndrome, an autoimmune disorder affecting the nervous system that triggers paralysis in legs, upper limbs and face, and an inability to breathe. At least 25 died and, longer term, the figure would have been far higher.
The drug companies and the World Health Organization (WHO) are telling us that the 'swine flu' vaccine is safe when it has been revealed that 600 senior neurologists in the UK were sent a confidential letter by government health officials warning of a coming increase in Guillain-Barre syndrome as a result of the 'swine flu' vaccinations.
The letter came from the Health Protection Agency, the official body that oversees public health, and warned neurologists 'to be alert for an increase in a brain disorder called Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS), which could be triggered by the ... vaccine'. A senior neurologist quoted by the London Daily Mail said: 'I would not have the swine flu jab because of the GBS risk'.
Great, eh? The government 'Health Protection' Agency tells 600 neurologists about the expected effects - but not the public.
The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) in the United States have officially predicted 30,000 serious and potentially fatal reactions to the H1N1 vaccine while at the same time insisting that it be effective in only three out of every ten recipients. The requirement is even less for people over 65.
You might say that this was madness and it is on one level, because the people behind the global conspiracy are by any standards utterly insane. It is not bureaucratic madness, however, except in the way it plays out through the useful idiots. At its core, it is cold, calculated mass murder-type madness.
As I have been stressing for years, the same families, led by the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers, created and control the World Health Organization, the Centers for Disease Control and the Food and Drug Administration (and their equivalent around the world), and the pharmaceutical cartel, or Big Pharma. These bodies may appear to be unconnected, but they are all on the same team answering to the same masters.
Executives from drug giants Baxter International, Novartis and GlaxoSmithKline sat on the World Health Organization's vaccine advisory board that recommended mass vaccinations in July. They all move as one unit.
Baxter International of Illinois was exposed in February for contaminating vaccine materials with live bird flu virus sent to 18 locations. The virus was supplied by the World Health Organization and was mixed with seasonal flu viruses to produce a potentially deadly combination.
This 'mistake' - yeah, right - was only discovered when a laboratory in the Czech Republic tested the concoction on ferrets and they all died.
Now tens of billions of public dollars, pounds and euros are being handed to sinister corporations like Baxter International and Novartis to mass vaccinate the global population. No matter what the economic situation there is never a shortage of money when the agenda is involved, be it for wars of mass slaughter or vaccination programmes of mass slaughter. Killing people is big business - ask the weapons producers.
Austrian journalist Jane Bürgermeister has filed criminal charges with the FBI against the World Health Organization, United Nations, Barack Obama, a Rockefeller, a Rothschild, and others, after she uncovered a plot to cull the population with the 'swine flu' vaccine.
She said that bird flu and swine flu have been developed in laboratories and released on the public with the aim of mass murder through vaccination. Her filed document, Bioterrorism Evidence, correctly claims that the World Health Organization, United Nations and vaccine-makers such as Baxter International and Novartis are part of a single system under the control of a core criminal group that has 'funded the development, manufacturing and release of artificial viruses in order to justify mass vaccinations with a bioweapon substance in order to eliminate the people of the USA, and so gain control of the assets, resources etc. of North America'.
Bürgermeister's 'core criminal group' is the network of interbreeding families, like the Rothschilds and Rockefellers, known as the Illuminati. The plot she talks about is, of course, worldwide and not just in the United States.
Novartis and Baxter International applied for patents for this vaccine long before the engineered 'outbreak' in Mexico in April. Novartis made its provisional patent application in 2005 and it was approved in February this year. Baxter International applied for its patent in August 2008 and it came through in March, just before the virus was released in Mexico to start the whole thing rolling.
The sequence is this: patent the vaccine; release the laboratory-created 'swine flu' virus in Mexico; use the controlled and pathetic media to cause panic in the population over 'deadly' swine flu; tell the World Health Organization to declare a pandemic and demand vaccination for the entire human race; spread a strengthened virus in the vaccine and through other means to cause terror and hysteria to ensure that people line up for their jab of live virus. Oh yes, and get governments to give you blanket immunity from prosecution for the effects of your vaccine.
Drug companies would not coldly set out to kill and maim vast numbers of people? What?? That's their job. They have been doing it year after year since Big Pharma was created by John D Rockefeller, an asset of the Rothschild dynasty.
Shane Ellison was a medicinal chemist for drug companies Array BioPharma and Eli Lilly, but resigned in disgust at what he saw on the inside. He now promotes natural remedies under the title 'The People's Chemist'. He said in an article this week:
'As a young chemist working in the chemistry labs of corporate America, I watched as they promoted cancer causing drugs as anti-cancer remedies (tamoxifen). I also witnessed the pharmaceutically compliant media convince the world that depression was a disease and you needed the so-called antidepressant drug Prozac™ to treat it. I began to wonder, "How gullible are the masses?" The reaction to the swine flu scare answered this.'
American researcher Patrick Jordan uncovered World Health Organization memos dating from 1972 explaining how to kill people with vaccines by undermining the immune system, injecting viruses and creating an immune response so enormous that it kills the body. This is known as the cytokine storm.
The initial spread of Aids in the United States matched the locations of vaccination trials for Hepatitis B in homosexual communities and the initial outbreak in Africa mirrored the locations of mass smallpox vaccinations ordered by the World Health Organization with vaccine reportedly supplied by Novartis.
Big Pharma and the World Health Organization are killing machines and the cemeteries of the world are full of their victims. Gullibility can indeed be lethal.
Fear and gullibility - babes-in-arms syndrome, as I call it - will ensure that enormous numbers of unquestioning dupes race to the vaccine centres in the coming weeks and months. But the world is a lot wiser to what is going on that it was five, ten or twenty years ago and there are now very large numbers of people who can see through the lies.
This is where the police state comes in and the plan is to make the vaccine compulsory. We are already moving fast in that direction and what is now emerging in American states like Massachusetts is the blueprint for everywhere.
'Sir, we found one that's not had the shot ...'
The Massachusetts Senate has passed the flu pandemic bill S 2028 that imposes a state of fascism whenever the governor decides to do so in the wake of a flu pandemic - like, you know, the one they plan to engineer. The bill authorises the state health commissioner, law enforcement, and medical personnel to:
* Vaccinate the population
* Enter private property with no warrants
* Quarantine people against their will
* Arrest without a warrant anyone a police officer deems has violated an isolation or quarantine order
* Jail or fine at the rate of $1,000 a day anyone in such violation
Similar isolation orders are being implemented in Florida, Washington, Iowa and North Carolina. The rest will follow and the same is planned all over the world - if we stand for it.
An internal French government document has come to light detailing covert plans to vaccinate everyone in France without exception starting on September 28th and continuing until January. The document is dated August 21st and is signed by Rosaylne Batchelot-Narquin, the French Health Minister, and Brice Hortefeux, the French Minister of Interior and Overseas Territories.
It has been sent to the heads of the country's 'defence zones', law enforcement and regional health authorities. Some of its main points are:
* Medical personnel, medical students and medical army personnel can be compelled to administer vaccines or face penalties
* 'Vaccination centers' to be established in 'secure facilities' in every region and no medical establishments will be involved, nor any general practitioners
* Schoolchildren to be vaccinated at school by special mobile pandemic vaccination teams
* The public are not to be 'informed' until the end of September
Similar documents will be circulating in all 194 member states of the World Health Organization because all this is centrally coordinated.
French President Nicolas Sarkozy ... Illuminati to his fingertips.
Documents and statements that have emerged over the years make it clear that the Illuminati cabal and their bloodline families want to dramatically reduce the global population to perhaps as low as 500 million - more than six billion fewer than at present.
The 'elite' families behind the mass 'swine flu' vaccinations are the origin of the 'master race' eugenics movement with Adolf Hitler their most high-profile advocate. The Rockfeller family, who are Rothschild subordinates, financed Hitler's 'race purity' expert, Ernst Rudin, at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute in Munich, and many other leading eugenicists.
Rudin was president of the International Federation of Eugenic Organizations and a global figure in the eugenics movement which advocated - still advocates - the removal of 'inferior' people through segregation, sterilisation and extermination to create a 'better' or 'master' race.
The population cullers are the driving force behind the swine flu vaccination programme. The President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology in the United States warned this week that swine flu was a 'threat to our nation', estimated that 90,000 could die, and said everyone must be vaccinated.
This Council of Advisors is chaired by John P Holdren, the director of the White House Office of Science and Technology. Holdren co-wrote a book in 1977, called Ecoscience, that details proposals to mass sterilise the population by medicating food and the water supply and to impose a regime of forced abortion, government seizure of children born out of wedlock and mandatory bodily implants designed to prevent pregnancy.
Holdren wrote the book with those infamous population-control extremists, Paul and Anne Ehrlich, and have no doubt that such sterlisation plans have long been implemented - sperm counts have dropped by a third since 1989 and by half in 50 years.
Holdren has been desperately trying to deny that he supports forced population control after the content of Ecoscience was recently exposed. This is rather difficult, however, when you have co-written a 1,000-page textbook advocating exactly that.
The plan is to introduce compulsory vaccination and they are moving there step by step with the announcement this week that it will be mandatory for all military personnel starting in October.
Public resistance to compulsory vaccination makes even more sense of the story I revealed in 2008 about how designated police officers in each county of the United Kingdom were preparing for a 'coming war' and mass public protests in the streets. I have no doubt that a war is on the agenda, too, at some point, but it is clear that this preparation also involves the public reaction to compulsory vaccinations. This, in turn, connects with the establishment of 'Disaster Recovery Centres' in each county.
One of these designated 'prepare for war' police officers told his friend (who contacted me) that they were preparing for the military to be on the streets with the police to deal with mass protests.
Other uniform professions, like private security guards, traffic wardens and CCTV operators, would perform the other duties of the police while they were dealing with the protests, the police officer said.
This is happening with traffic wardens, who once dealt only with parking offences, now renamed 'civil enforcement officers' and given powers that were exclusively those of the police. The UK government also announced a new designation called an 'accredited person' - private security guards, CCTV operators etc., who will be given some of the powers of police officers.
The Pentagon has recently asked Congress for clearance to post nearly 400,000 military personnel throughout the United States in the event of an 'emergency' and 'major disaster' under the control of US Northern Command, or 'NorthCom'.
In truth, large numbers of these troops will not even be American. The military has been amassing an army of foreign troops to patrol the streets of America in the knowledge that many American soldiers will be reluctant to fire on their own people.
NorthCom is the domestic military operation created as a Problem-Reaction-Solution after 9/11 to 'protect' the 'homeland' from 'terrorists' (We the People). NorthCom is also responsible for 'theatre security cooperation' with Canada and Mexico. These people love their Orwellian language.
General Victor Renuart, the head of NorthCom, has produced plans for the miltary to work with FEMA, the Illuminati's truly evil Federal Emergency Management Agency, in the event of a major swine flu outbreak and is awaiting approval from Bush and Obama 'Defense' Secretary, Robert Gates. It will, of course, be granted.
Renuart gave public testimony in March, a month before the 'swine flu' outbreak in Mexico, that NorthCom had prepared for a flu outbreak originating in Mexico. He said NorthCom was focused on 'developing and improving procedures to respond to potentially catastrophic events such as pandemic influenza outbreak ...' Was he a prophet? No, he knew what was coming.
I can't say when all this will kick-off in earnest, but you can see the pieces being rapidly moved into place hour by hour. The vaccinations will be underway in weeks and everything will follow from that as the months unfold.
We need to be strong and we need to be unified. What does someone's religion, colour, income bracket or sexuality matter when you are faced with this satanic agenda? This is not about killing and maiming white people, black people, Muslims, Hindus or Jews. It is an attack on the health and freedoms of all of us, so we must meet that threat as One.
We need to come together in mutual support with unbreakable determination and a backbone that will not wilt.
No matter what the intimidation we must refuse the vaccination for ourselves and our families and make it as difficult as possible for the authorities to impose their will. If people react with violent protest, they will be handing all the aces to the police state. It is not a violent response that we need, but a calm and peaceful mass campaign of non-cooperation.
A system run by a few cannot function if the masses will not cooperate with it.
Calmness is essential or we stop thinking straight and never was there a more important time to think straight than in the months and years ahead before this control system is dismantled.
Hey, and you in the middle and lower ranks of administration in governments and their agencies; you in uniform, be it the military, police, whatever ... What the hell are you doing? You have children and grandchildren, too. What the hell are you doing?
Wake up, grow up, get informed and start to break ranks before you enforce a prison-state on your own families.
This is no time for faint hearts ... we came to sort out this fascist nonsense and the time will come when we will. Let us meet that challenge - look it in the eye - instead of running for cover.
One line sums it up ...
HUMAN RACE
GET OFF YOUR
KNEES.
Come on, let's go.