Calcium supplements boost myocardial infarction risk
30/07/2010 11:58:00 admin
Myocardial infarction or heart attack was more commonly found in patients with osteoporosis who used calcium supplements, a meta-analysis of 16 studies reported in the British Medical Journal or BMJ revealed.
Doctors whose training on nutrition received from medical school is generally limited if any may advise their patients with bone disease to take calcium supplements with or without supplementation of vitamin D.
But the current study led by Ian Reid, MD, of the University of Auckland in New Zealand, and colleagues showed patients who had osteoporosis and took calcium supplements were 30 percent more likely to suffer myocardial infarction or heart attack.
The study was based on data from 11 previous clinical trials of 11,921 participants who were followed for a mean period of four years and five observational studies of 8151 participants who were followed for 3.6 years on average.
Patients in none of the studies were using vitamin D along with calcium supplements.
In the current study, separate analyses of data from both types of studies showed similar results, using calcium supplements was associated with 30 percent increased risk of myocardial infarction.
Suzanne Steinbaum, DO, cardiologist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City, was quoted by MedPage Today as commenting that "For patients who are at risk for heart disease, with multiple risk factors, or a strong family history, perhaps calcium supplementation should not be considered."
In the analysis of data from studies which were reported by patients, calcium supplementation was linked with an increased risk of myocardial infarction in those who had a dietary calcium intake above an average 805 mg per day, but not in those with a lower dietary intake.
The authors noted that calcium supplements may increase the risk of myocardial infarction by increasing serum calcium levels which have been found linked with higher heart attack risk in some epidemiological studies.
How could calcium supplements increase risk of myocardial infarction?
A myocardial infarction or heart attack occurs when blood flow to an area of the heart muscle is completely blocked, according to the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute.
The blockage results from coronary artery disease - a condition in which plaque builds up inside the coronary arteries. The plaque consists of fat, cholesterol, calcium and other substances in the blood.
Healingdaily.com suggests on its website that it is part of a terrible campaign that convinces patients that cholesterol is the major cause for heart disease and suppresses the fact that calcium plays a potentially even more important role in heart disease.
It should not be news that calcium supplements increase risk of cardiovascular disease such as heart attack as many studies have demonstrated the association.
In fact, a class of drugs called calcium channel blockers have been found at least as effective in reducing risk of cardiovascular disease including heart attack as other anti-hypertensive medications, according to Alcocer L and colleagues from Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
The drugs of this class are known to reduce risk of coronary calcification and retard progression of atherosclerosis, Alcocer et al. said in their report published this year in American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs.
The current study even though there are some limitations suggests that too much calcium can be a risk for myocardial infarction or heart attack.
High concentrations of calcium are found in both animal-based foods such as milk, yogurt and cheddar cheese and plant-based foods such as pinto beans, red beans, white beans, tofu, bok choy, kale, Chinese cabbage, broccoli, rhubarb and spinach.
By David Liu
Friday, July 30, 2010
Grim Tidings From the Netherlands: Prince Bernhard’s Grandchildren Continue Bilderberg Legacy
Grim Tidings From the Netherlands: Prince Bernhard’s Grandchildren Continue Bilderberg Legacy
Micha Kat & Jurriaan Maessen
Infowars.com
July 29, 2010
“While you here do snoring lie, Open-eyed conspiracy His time doth take.”
–William Shakespeare (The Tempest)
In the following article, we set out to trace the steps of two brothers, both of whom are grandsons of Bilderberg-founder Bernhard, who have now been destined to carry along the torch of treason. The objective: to dismantle the nation-state, strip the people of their self-determination and free will, and position themselves as sovereign rulers of the planet. Their common cause does not deviate from the age-old directive, but their means are custom-made to fit current times.
Children of the Dutch royal family are destined to carry along the torch of treason.
To those who feel that the quest for a worldwide grid, a prison-planet, is too great an effort to conceal from public scrutiny, we can say there’s hardly any concealment on the part of the elite. We can even say that the perpetrators are generally committing their acts in the full light of day, as they speak quite openly about their vision for the world. Those who have been instructed to conceal and “repackage” information to a ready-made format are our trusted media-empires. They can be perfectly trusted with the job of keeping the lid on vital information about the scientific dictatorship emerging in our everyday lives.
For example, when the third born son to queen Beatrix of the Netherlands, prince Constantijn van Oranje, published a series of RAND-policy papers, calling for the “global governance of the internet”, none of this ever filtered down to the masses, who were instead being spoon-fed the scores of an arbitrary football-match or some low-grade soap star’s latest fling.
Constantijn van Oranje-Nassau
In 2009, the official website of the Dutch royal family published Constantijn’s résumé. One of his functions, according to the royal family, was that of “programme associate of the Bilderberg conference.” Regrettably, since one of the authors (Maessen) published it on InfoWars.Com, the Bilderberg-reference was scrapped from the royal website before a screen-shot of it could be salvaged. The current web page does however mention his earlier commissions with key-institutions within the New World Order architecture.
Constantijn van Oranje-Nassau.
As the royal families own website reports, from 2001 to 2003 prince Constantijn worked as a strategic policy consultant with Booz, Allen & Hamilton operating out of London, England. Booz Allen is a globally operating, self-proclaimed ‘private consulting firm’ right out of a John Grisham novel with all the dark intrigue that goes along with it. Since its creation in the early 1900s, Booz, Allen & Hamilton has been intimately tied to the military-industrial complex including ‘long-standing relationships with federal intelligence agencies’- as a superficial glance on Wikipedia reveals. A March 8 2008 article in CorpWatch reported that the the firm ‘is a key advisor and prime contractor to all of the major U.S. intelligence agencies.(…) Among the many services Booz Allen provides to intelligence agencies, according to its website, are war-gaming- simulated drills in which military and intelligence officials test their response to potential threats like terrorist attacks.’ A most interesting speciality of the firm is the development of electronic surveillance equipment and other spy-tools to be used against the people. When the queen selected the ‘prestigious’ firm as an employer for her son, she must have known that you can’t get more New World Order than Booz, Allen & Hamilton. Or can you?
In the summer of 2003 the prince began working for the Dutch ministry of Foreign Affairs as ‘advisor on European Communications’. In this function, Constantijn specialised in ‘communication strategies’ with the stated aim of getting the Dutch behind further ‘European cooperation’. The prince obviously wasn’t very successful as the Dutch convincingly rejected the European Constitution in 2005. After the young prince checked out of the office of the Dutch European Commissioner he checked into a more comfortable office at RAND Europe’s Brussels division to further tinker on his ’strategies’. Here he co-wrote several technical reports on a range of subjects: from web 2.0, to RFID technology and other matters concerning ‘global governance’. In 2008 Constantijn was promoted to head the Brussels RAND office, expanding his influence even more. In Daniel Estulin’s 2005 bestseller “The Bilderberg Group” the author clarifies the ties between the RAND-corporation and the big globalist foundations:
“The interlocking leadership between the trustees at RAND, and the Ford, Rockefeller, and Carnegie foundations”, writes Estulin, “is a classic case of Bilderberg modus operandi. The Ford foundation gave one million dollars to RAND in 1952, at a time when the president of the Ford Foundation was simultaneously the chairman of RAND.”
It wasn’t long before Constantijn was promoted to the next level in the New World Order hierarchy. Earlier this year, the young prince was appointed senior advisor to the private office of European Commissioner for the Digital Agenda, Ms Neelie Kroes.
Now it so happens that Ms. Kroes attends Bilderberg almost annually, where she keeps close quarters with the queen. No wonder that she chose of the queen’s offspring to become senior advisor at her office. Of all of the prime research areas the prince could envelop himself in, throughout his short career he specifically chose the subjects we identify with the worldwide surveillance grid and the New World Order: RFID tracking technology, a top-down controlled Internet and the promotion of more ‘cooperation’ worldwide through inflated transnational institutions.
“Enlightened Leadership”
In 2009 Constantijn published his “discussion paper on critical issues” under the RAND-umbrella titled The Future of the Internet Economy. In it, he is quite uninhibited in his call for the emergence of an overall system of control to steer the course of events globally.
“(…) the Internet as a global infrastructure needs a global governance structure”, Van Oranje writes.
“International governance is necessary to deal with global issues and ensuring effective functioning of the Internet, following principles of good governance.”
The deliberately vague addition of “good governance” is a smart way to circumvent explaining that only a tyrannical transnational system can guarantee “effective functioning of the Internet.” Furthermore, the prince advocates the ideal tool for future slavery: one common, global electronic denominator hooked into a hive-like supercomputer:
“Though a sectoral, geographic and multi-layered patchwork is likely, a scenario with a more unified system is not impossible either. There are significant benefits for citizens, governments and commercial operators to have a more standardised system that would support a large range of eGovernment services and functions. One system would eliminate the need for multiple cards, would increase the possibility for interconnecting systems”, and the list goes on.
The warnings of Aaron Russo immediately spring to mind, don’t they? As one of the determinants of such a common system through which all of human traffic should be channelled, the report mentions:
“The level of Pan-European ambition towards the use of a single eIdentity throughout Europe by 2015: Will policy makers of Commission (European Commission) and Member States agree on a system that is to support only simple identity; will Pan-European services be build/transformed in a way that they benefit directly from eID; or will there be a natural evolution towards one single European IDM, adequate for most national and Pan-European Government Services?”
In another 2009 document titled Trends in connectivity technologies and their socioeconomic impacts, the prince arrives at the logical conclusion of his train of thought: world government.
“ (…) both policy issues and effective responses must be defined at a global level; to influence the solution a global coordination and ‘enlightened leadership’ is required.” and “policy issues, not always solutions, will be defined at a global level. Those few countries or regional blocks like the EU where these technologies are already at an advanced stage may take a more or less enlightened lead role.”
These are just a few out of literally hundreds of examples where the global elite imagine themselves to be enlightened leaders, who because of their ‘royal blood’ are destined to steer the course of world events. Besides the fact that Constantijn has shown great interest in pursuing matters of tyranny, which no doubt helps to attain such a ‘prestigious’ position at Bilderberg, the young prince above all owes his current position to the blue blood running through his veins- which makes a comfortable seat around the camp fire of the New World Order an absolute guarantee.
Johan Friso van Oranje-Nassau
From Constantijn, the queen’s third son, we move to Johan Friso, her second (1968) and least known of the three. As we shall see, the secrecy surrounding Friso has more than one reason. We can begin by stating that he is not even mentioned on the official website of the royal family, www.koninklijkhuis.nl; the reason is that the highly controversial woman he married in 2004 –Mabel Wisse Smit- who established ties with organized crime through her liaison in 1989 and 1990 with top drugs-trafficker Klaas Bruinsma, shot to his death in 1991 in front of the Amsterdam Hilton Hotel. Bruinsma, according to the Dutch Wikipedia, ‘can be considered as the founding father of Dutch drugs trafficking’.
Prince Johan Friso and Mabel Wisse Smit on their wedding day in 2004.
When this –utterly secret- liaison was revealed in 2003 in what can be considered as one of the last heroic facts of Dutch journalism, the young prince had to beg the Dutch parliament for the green light, as controversial marriages of members of the royal family in the Netherlands are subject to parliamentary approval. But prime minister Jan Peter Balkenende, known as the perfect ‘royal puppet’, refused to subject the marriage to parliamentary voting. He considered the risk of a humiliating ‘royal defeat’ too great to take. Instead, he let Friso draw up a letter to the effect that the prince chose not to let parliament vote, accepting all consequences that may result from his risky union. One of these was that he would have to abstain from the Dutch throne and would no longer –officially- be considered a member of the royal family with all the related benefits and entitlements. Later Friso and his wife apologized on Dutch national television for ‘not having given full disclosure about the relations of Mrs Wisse-Smit with Mr Bruinsma’ but that they had ‘nothing bad in mind’. Nice to meet you: prince Johan Friso, count of Oranje-Nassau, son of the queen of the Netherlands.
Ties with Drugs Trafficking
By introducing Wisse Smit in their (private) family fold, the Dutch royal family continued its long established ties with drugs trafficking which originated with king William I who in 1824 founded the Netherlands Trading Society, in essence a Bruinsma-like organization for trafficking and distributing opium throughout the colonies. The enormous family capital of the Orange family dates back to that illustrious era.
In regards to the life Friso and Mabel lead these days with their two children, near to nothing is known. The only function that is openly published is (from 2004 onwards) his ‘part time directorship with TNO Space’, an organization with strong ties to the military-industrial complex and leading in the field of ‘earth observation’ through satellites. Friso obtained a master degree in Aviation and Space Technology at the university of Delft before continuing his studies in California.
His wife Mabel, just before beginning a relationship with the Dutch Al Capone, became (1997) director of the Brussels-based Open Society Institute, a play toy of billionaire-investor (and prominent Bilderberger) George Soros. Until recently she worked for this organization form its London office. Everything that is known about Mabel however points in just one direction: unbridled promiscuity. In the Netherlands it is said: either you slept with her or you know someone who did- a type of behavior that seems ill positioned to go together with what is known about Friso: he is a homosexual and has been frequently spotted as such, especially in Berkeley, California where he studied form 1986 to 1988. The main source for this is the late Willem Oltmans, a famous Dutch –homosexual- journalist who was demonized by the Dutch State for his ongoing revelations and later compensated for the destruction of his career with 8 million guilders. So this leads to one of the most tantalizing questions surrounding the Dutch royals: why does a homosexual prince marry the most promiscuous woman of the country who also has ties to the greatest criminal of the country whereby he looses his claim to the throne and is damned to a life of lies and secrecy about his private preferences?
Homosexuality and Pedophilia
Nothing is known about a courting-period; and Friso looked famously unhappy on his wedding-day, even to the point that on the web all stories about his homosexuality started popping up again. The only possible answer lies in the fact that the Dutch Royals also had ties to the criminal Bruinsma-group, and that Wisse Smit could blackmail her way into the family –and to fame and invulnerability- by threatening to expose these ties, knowledge of which she obtained through her relationship with the capo himself. Partly these ties were already in the open, to say the least.
In one of the most damning episodes of the criminal history of this family, it was revealed that the personal lawyer of Beatrix, Frits Salomonson, who also was a member of the Committee of Guardians of the crown prince, was the prime whitewasher of the Bruinsma drug-millions, transporting them from the criminal underworld to the ‘legal’ business communities through a criminal stock-exchange listed phantom-company that was only there for whitewashing drugs money. So the ‘groundwork’ for possible further revelations about criminal activities of ‘the family’ was already there, giving Mabel Wisse Smit an easy ride. In an horrendous –and still widely debated- epilogue to this chapter of Dutch royal history, the politician that broke the news of the criminal role of her majesties counsel, Maarten van Traa, died in a car accident shortly after the revelations that is till this day shrouded in clouds and mysteries.
The name Frits Salomonson is not only tied to whitewashing of drugs money. The man was a well known homosexual and pedophile against whom is strong evidence of having raped, brutalized and even tortured young children. This same lawyer introduced the late husband of Beatrix, Claus, the father of Friso, into the New York gay scene as has been published by the MSM. Claus’ homosexuality was a public secret but became a threat to public safety and the nation as such when it became obvious that the State was blackmailed as a result of Claus’ being seen and identified in the most dirty of homosexual and pedo-sexual localities. This problem was ‘solved’ by eliminating him from the public domain in 1982 as a result of a ‘grave psychiatric condition’. The man eventually ended high up on a mountain in Switzerland and has never regained any position of significance.
The main source for this string of events is a very detailed article in German that was meant to be published by Der Spiegel but never made its way to the public. In many ways this sad story of Claus’ life is repeated in that of Friso: a homosexual being married to a woman, experimenting with sexual preferences in the USA because it is ‘far from home’, the (danger of) being blackmailed and- on an even more sinister note- evidence of pedophilia and other forms of child abuse. Of course, these kind of allegations and stories are mostly impossible to verify for obvious reasons. But in the case of the Dutch royals there is much that can be established as fact concerning child-abuse and ritual, sometimes even sadistic maltreatment:
The great-grandfather from Friso’s mother’s side, a German prince named Hendrik, raped his own daughter, the mother of queen Beatrix, as a result of which a daughter was born. The father of Friso, Claus, was a homosexual who also used children for sexual pleasure. The lawyer of the Queen and main guardian of the crown prince, Friso’s brother, was a sadistic pedophile against whom even testimony of child executions exists.
Is it against this factual background, outrageous or beyond imagination, that recently a witness has come forward claiming –from first hand- that Friso was present at a satanic execution of a young woman in the province of Friesland in the night after queens day in 1999? This murder case –Marianne Vaatstra- is still the most high profile so-called ‘cold case’ in Dutch criminal history and it is established fact that the police is still doing everything to prevent the truth from surfacing, like smuggling the prime suspects out of the country just days after the murder took place.
Confessions of a Royal Hitman
Johan Friso is the grandson of Bilderberg-founder Bernhard and the son of queen Beatrix who, according to knowledgeable sources, holds the third position in the current Bilderberg hierarchy. Sources say Beatrix once took Friso with her to a Bilderberg meeting. This seems all the more factual as we take into consideration the strong –and up to now still largely unpublished- ties between Friso and prominent Bilderberger James Wolfensohn, former president of the World Bank, a prime Bilderberg-tool in establishing the NWO. Since 2006 Friso acts as managing director for Wolfensohn & Company in the London office of the firm. What exactly is this firm concocting in the ‘emerging market economies’? It advises and consults on behalf of ‘governments’ and ‘large corporations’ doing business there, according to the company’s website. A more accurate impression can no doubt be gained by reading John Perkin’s famous whistle-blower treatise Confessions of an Economic Hitman.
In short: with organizations like these it’s all about bringing weak countries into the NWO power-structure by ‘advising’ them to take on large loans –from the World Bank, the IMF, Goldman Sachs- that they can never pay back. The loaner then can lay hands on natural resources of the debtor, other valuable assets like harbors and airports and even exert political backing for NWO-related proposals in organizations like the UN and WTO. This is the game Perkins describes and Wolfensohn excels in, with the help of the Dutch prince Johan Friso of Oranje Nassau. Interestingly enough, this type of work of Friso as a ‘royal hitman’ is of exactly the same category as what his wife Mabel is doing as a party-girl for George Soros and for an organization named The Elders of which she is (since 2008) director, an ‘independent group of eminent global leaders’ brought together by Nelson Mandela with names such as Jimmy Carter, Kofi Annan and Desmond Tutu; this group ‘takes initiatives’ on behalf of countries like Sudan, Myanmar and Zimbabwe.
Big Bilderberg Brother is Watching You
We already mentioned Friso’s ties to the military-industrial complex through his activities for TNO Space that specializes in developing techniques for controlling the population from outer space. What can now also be revealed is that Friso in 2005 and 2006 has been a partner with venture capital investment firm Logispring in Geneva, Switzerland. This firm, led by a Dutchman named Frans van Schaik, is active on the same big brother-chessboard and invests in companies like Xterprise (Texas, USA) specializing in NWO dream-tools like RFID, or Radio Frequency Identification, a technique we already stumbled upon in the previous section on Constantijn. These activities of Friso have never been published by Dutch media outlets and have only become known through the website of Wolfensohn & Company short business biography of Friso. (click: “Investment team” and then “Friso van Oranje” through link provided). The same applies to Friso’s co-foundership of MRI Centre that excels in body scanning-techniques for the medical sector. The same Wolfensohn website also sheds some light on what Friso was doing with Goldman Sachs in London where he was executive director from 1998 to 2003. Friso was into investment banking in the sectors media and technology and was also assigned to Goldman Sachs Capital Partners, the private equity arm of Goldman Sachs. This banking conglomerate is these days considered as a criminal organization pur sang and countries like Spain, Greece and Germany have stopped doing business with Goldman’s suicide bankers, as they’ve been called by journalist Max Keiser. Currently GS is investing through its Capital Partners VI-fund (more than 20 billion dollars).
No doubt Friso was hired by GS to look for high potential possibilities in the field of big brother-technologies for optimizing the NWO control grid of the world population through micro-chipping, radio-tracking, body-scanning and satellite-spying.
William-Alexander of Orange-Nassau
Concluding, a word about the oldest brother: William-Alexander, heir to the throne, who accompanies his mother to the annual Bilderberg-meetings. He is certainly no stranger to the long-term ambitions of his family, but- as heir to the throne- keeps his actions much more in the dark than his two brothers. As he is subject to a high degree of scrutiny, this prince passes his time with ‘global water-management’ for the UN. And even in this apparently innocent day job, the prince can hardly refrain from pushing global governance. It’s in his blood, you might say. In a document prepared by the prince for the Johannesburg Summit, he states:
“The most important area of global governance with a substantial potential impact on the water sector is the system of international trade.”
Lamenting that: “The effort to develop a much-needed institutional framework for international water governance has met with resistance and been relatively unsuccessful”, the prince recommends to “Have the World Trade Organization develop and consider virtual water balances, using a resource accounting framework, when assessing and negotiating agriculture subsidies and trade in agricultural products.”
Here they go again, have the WTO strangle nation-states into submission by lending and retracting agricultural funding.
“In the international arena”, says the prince, “water has shown to be a good catalyst for cooperation between nations.”
At a 2004 meeting of the International Institute for Sustainable Development held at United Nations headquarters in New York, the prince of Orange sat side by side with Bilderberger and Executive Director of UNEP Klaus Töpfer, discussing the “overall review of implementation of Agenda 21.” This, by the way, is the same Töpfer that admitted to an “international consensus on worldwide population control” back in 2000.
In Conclusion
Slowly but surely a picture is emerging from the plethora of facts. Both prince’s former and current employers are without exception notorious and regular Bilderbergers: No doubt a big Bilderberg future lies ahead for both princes, sons of the current Bilderberg number three and grandsons of its founder.
Although the New World Order’s quest for total control of the world’s natural (and human) resources is one that spans many decades and even centuries, the latest generation is as fervent to accomplish the destruction of nation-states as their forefathers ever were. History points out to us that decisive developments and events are not simply the children of coincidence, they are brought about at the hands of ruling elites throughout the ages.
Micha Kat is an investigative journalist and the foremost Bilderberg-hunter in the Netherlands. His website is www.klokkenluideronline.nl.
Jurriaan Maessen is a writer and freelance investigative journalist.
Micha Kat & Jurriaan Maessen
Infowars.com
July 29, 2010
“While you here do snoring lie, Open-eyed conspiracy His time doth take.”
–William Shakespeare (The Tempest)
In the following article, we set out to trace the steps of two brothers, both of whom are grandsons of Bilderberg-founder Bernhard, who have now been destined to carry along the torch of treason. The objective: to dismantle the nation-state, strip the people of their self-determination and free will, and position themselves as sovereign rulers of the planet. Their common cause does not deviate from the age-old directive, but their means are custom-made to fit current times.
Children of the Dutch royal family are destined to carry along the torch of treason.
To those who feel that the quest for a worldwide grid, a prison-planet, is too great an effort to conceal from public scrutiny, we can say there’s hardly any concealment on the part of the elite. We can even say that the perpetrators are generally committing their acts in the full light of day, as they speak quite openly about their vision for the world. Those who have been instructed to conceal and “repackage” information to a ready-made format are our trusted media-empires. They can be perfectly trusted with the job of keeping the lid on vital information about the scientific dictatorship emerging in our everyday lives.
For example, when the third born son to queen Beatrix of the Netherlands, prince Constantijn van Oranje, published a series of RAND-policy papers, calling for the “global governance of the internet”, none of this ever filtered down to the masses, who were instead being spoon-fed the scores of an arbitrary football-match or some low-grade soap star’s latest fling.
Constantijn van Oranje-Nassau
In 2009, the official website of the Dutch royal family published Constantijn’s résumé. One of his functions, according to the royal family, was that of “programme associate of the Bilderberg conference.” Regrettably, since one of the authors (Maessen) published it on InfoWars.Com, the Bilderberg-reference was scrapped from the royal website before a screen-shot of it could be salvaged. The current web page does however mention his earlier commissions with key-institutions within the New World Order architecture.
Constantijn van Oranje-Nassau.
As the royal families own website reports, from 2001 to 2003 prince Constantijn worked as a strategic policy consultant with Booz, Allen & Hamilton operating out of London, England. Booz Allen is a globally operating, self-proclaimed ‘private consulting firm’ right out of a John Grisham novel with all the dark intrigue that goes along with it. Since its creation in the early 1900s, Booz, Allen & Hamilton has been intimately tied to the military-industrial complex including ‘long-standing relationships with federal intelligence agencies’- as a superficial glance on Wikipedia reveals. A March 8 2008 article in CorpWatch reported that the the firm ‘is a key advisor and prime contractor to all of the major U.S. intelligence agencies.(…) Among the many services Booz Allen provides to intelligence agencies, according to its website, are war-gaming- simulated drills in which military and intelligence officials test their response to potential threats like terrorist attacks.’ A most interesting speciality of the firm is the development of electronic surveillance equipment and other spy-tools to be used against the people. When the queen selected the ‘prestigious’ firm as an employer for her son, she must have known that you can’t get more New World Order than Booz, Allen & Hamilton. Or can you?
In the summer of 2003 the prince began working for the Dutch ministry of Foreign Affairs as ‘advisor on European Communications’. In this function, Constantijn specialised in ‘communication strategies’ with the stated aim of getting the Dutch behind further ‘European cooperation’. The prince obviously wasn’t very successful as the Dutch convincingly rejected the European Constitution in 2005. After the young prince checked out of the office of the Dutch European Commissioner he checked into a more comfortable office at RAND Europe’s Brussels division to further tinker on his ’strategies’. Here he co-wrote several technical reports on a range of subjects: from web 2.0, to RFID technology and other matters concerning ‘global governance’. In 2008 Constantijn was promoted to head the Brussels RAND office, expanding his influence even more. In Daniel Estulin’s 2005 bestseller “The Bilderberg Group” the author clarifies the ties between the RAND-corporation and the big globalist foundations:
“The interlocking leadership between the trustees at RAND, and the Ford, Rockefeller, and Carnegie foundations”, writes Estulin, “is a classic case of Bilderberg modus operandi. The Ford foundation gave one million dollars to RAND in 1952, at a time when the president of the Ford Foundation was simultaneously the chairman of RAND.”
It wasn’t long before Constantijn was promoted to the next level in the New World Order hierarchy. Earlier this year, the young prince was appointed senior advisor to the private office of European Commissioner for the Digital Agenda, Ms Neelie Kroes.
Now it so happens that Ms. Kroes attends Bilderberg almost annually, where she keeps close quarters with the queen. No wonder that she chose of the queen’s offspring to become senior advisor at her office. Of all of the prime research areas the prince could envelop himself in, throughout his short career he specifically chose the subjects we identify with the worldwide surveillance grid and the New World Order: RFID tracking technology, a top-down controlled Internet and the promotion of more ‘cooperation’ worldwide through inflated transnational institutions.
“Enlightened Leadership”
In 2009 Constantijn published his “discussion paper on critical issues” under the RAND-umbrella titled The Future of the Internet Economy. In it, he is quite uninhibited in his call for the emergence of an overall system of control to steer the course of events globally.
“(…) the Internet as a global infrastructure needs a global governance structure”, Van Oranje writes.
“International governance is necessary to deal with global issues and ensuring effective functioning of the Internet, following principles of good governance.”
The deliberately vague addition of “good governance” is a smart way to circumvent explaining that only a tyrannical transnational system can guarantee “effective functioning of the Internet.” Furthermore, the prince advocates the ideal tool for future slavery: one common, global electronic denominator hooked into a hive-like supercomputer:
“Though a sectoral, geographic and multi-layered patchwork is likely, a scenario with a more unified system is not impossible either. There are significant benefits for citizens, governments and commercial operators to have a more standardised system that would support a large range of eGovernment services and functions. One system would eliminate the need for multiple cards, would increase the possibility for interconnecting systems”, and the list goes on.
The warnings of Aaron Russo immediately spring to mind, don’t they? As one of the determinants of such a common system through which all of human traffic should be channelled, the report mentions:
“The level of Pan-European ambition towards the use of a single eIdentity throughout Europe by 2015: Will policy makers of Commission (European Commission) and Member States agree on a system that is to support only simple identity; will Pan-European services be build/transformed in a way that they benefit directly from eID; or will there be a natural evolution towards one single European IDM, adequate for most national and Pan-European Government Services?”
In another 2009 document titled Trends in connectivity technologies and their socioeconomic impacts, the prince arrives at the logical conclusion of his train of thought: world government.
“ (…) both policy issues and effective responses must be defined at a global level; to influence the solution a global coordination and ‘enlightened leadership’ is required.” and “policy issues, not always solutions, will be defined at a global level. Those few countries or regional blocks like the EU where these technologies are already at an advanced stage may take a more or less enlightened lead role.”
These are just a few out of literally hundreds of examples where the global elite imagine themselves to be enlightened leaders, who because of their ‘royal blood’ are destined to steer the course of world events. Besides the fact that Constantijn has shown great interest in pursuing matters of tyranny, which no doubt helps to attain such a ‘prestigious’ position at Bilderberg, the young prince above all owes his current position to the blue blood running through his veins- which makes a comfortable seat around the camp fire of the New World Order an absolute guarantee.
Johan Friso van Oranje-Nassau
From Constantijn, the queen’s third son, we move to Johan Friso, her second (1968) and least known of the three. As we shall see, the secrecy surrounding Friso has more than one reason. We can begin by stating that he is not even mentioned on the official website of the royal family, www.koninklijkhuis.nl; the reason is that the highly controversial woman he married in 2004 –Mabel Wisse Smit- who established ties with organized crime through her liaison in 1989 and 1990 with top drugs-trafficker Klaas Bruinsma, shot to his death in 1991 in front of the Amsterdam Hilton Hotel. Bruinsma, according to the Dutch Wikipedia, ‘can be considered as the founding father of Dutch drugs trafficking’.
Prince Johan Friso and Mabel Wisse Smit on their wedding day in 2004.
When this –utterly secret- liaison was revealed in 2003 in what can be considered as one of the last heroic facts of Dutch journalism, the young prince had to beg the Dutch parliament for the green light, as controversial marriages of members of the royal family in the Netherlands are subject to parliamentary approval. But prime minister Jan Peter Balkenende, known as the perfect ‘royal puppet’, refused to subject the marriage to parliamentary voting. He considered the risk of a humiliating ‘royal defeat’ too great to take. Instead, he let Friso draw up a letter to the effect that the prince chose not to let parliament vote, accepting all consequences that may result from his risky union. One of these was that he would have to abstain from the Dutch throne and would no longer –officially- be considered a member of the royal family with all the related benefits and entitlements. Later Friso and his wife apologized on Dutch national television for ‘not having given full disclosure about the relations of Mrs Wisse-Smit with Mr Bruinsma’ but that they had ‘nothing bad in mind’. Nice to meet you: prince Johan Friso, count of Oranje-Nassau, son of the queen of the Netherlands.
Ties with Drugs Trafficking
By introducing Wisse Smit in their (private) family fold, the Dutch royal family continued its long established ties with drugs trafficking which originated with king William I who in 1824 founded the Netherlands Trading Society, in essence a Bruinsma-like organization for trafficking and distributing opium throughout the colonies. The enormous family capital of the Orange family dates back to that illustrious era.
In regards to the life Friso and Mabel lead these days with their two children, near to nothing is known. The only function that is openly published is (from 2004 onwards) his ‘part time directorship with TNO Space’, an organization with strong ties to the military-industrial complex and leading in the field of ‘earth observation’ through satellites. Friso obtained a master degree in Aviation and Space Technology at the university of Delft before continuing his studies in California.
His wife Mabel, just before beginning a relationship with the Dutch Al Capone, became (1997) director of the Brussels-based Open Society Institute, a play toy of billionaire-investor (and prominent Bilderberger) George Soros. Until recently she worked for this organization form its London office. Everything that is known about Mabel however points in just one direction: unbridled promiscuity. In the Netherlands it is said: either you slept with her or you know someone who did- a type of behavior that seems ill positioned to go together with what is known about Friso: he is a homosexual and has been frequently spotted as such, especially in Berkeley, California where he studied form 1986 to 1988. The main source for this is the late Willem Oltmans, a famous Dutch –homosexual- journalist who was demonized by the Dutch State for his ongoing revelations and later compensated for the destruction of his career with 8 million guilders. So this leads to one of the most tantalizing questions surrounding the Dutch royals: why does a homosexual prince marry the most promiscuous woman of the country who also has ties to the greatest criminal of the country whereby he looses his claim to the throne and is damned to a life of lies and secrecy about his private preferences?
Homosexuality and Pedophilia
Nothing is known about a courting-period; and Friso looked famously unhappy on his wedding-day, even to the point that on the web all stories about his homosexuality started popping up again. The only possible answer lies in the fact that the Dutch Royals also had ties to the criminal Bruinsma-group, and that Wisse Smit could blackmail her way into the family –and to fame and invulnerability- by threatening to expose these ties, knowledge of which she obtained through her relationship with the capo himself. Partly these ties were already in the open, to say the least.
In one of the most damning episodes of the criminal history of this family, it was revealed that the personal lawyer of Beatrix, Frits Salomonson, who also was a member of the Committee of Guardians of the crown prince, was the prime whitewasher of the Bruinsma drug-millions, transporting them from the criminal underworld to the ‘legal’ business communities through a criminal stock-exchange listed phantom-company that was only there for whitewashing drugs money. So the ‘groundwork’ for possible further revelations about criminal activities of ‘the family’ was already there, giving Mabel Wisse Smit an easy ride. In an horrendous –and still widely debated- epilogue to this chapter of Dutch royal history, the politician that broke the news of the criminal role of her majesties counsel, Maarten van Traa, died in a car accident shortly after the revelations that is till this day shrouded in clouds and mysteries.
The name Frits Salomonson is not only tied to whitewashing of drugs money. The man was a well known homosexual and pedophile against whom is strong evidence of having raped, brutalized and even tortured young children. This same lawyer introduced the late husband of Beatrix, Claus, the father of Friso, into the New York gay scene as has been published by the MSM. Claus’ homosexuality was a public secret but became a threat to public safety and the nation as such when it became obvious that the State was blackmailed as a result of Claus’ being seen and identified in the most dirty of homosexual and pedo-sexual localities. This problem was ‘solved’ by eliminating him from the public domain in 1982 as a result of a ‘grave psychiatric condition’. The man eventually ended high up on a mountain in Switzerland and has never regained any position of significance.
The main source for this string of events is a very detailed article in German that was meant to be published by Der Spiegel but never made its way to the public. In many ways this sad story of Claus’ life is repeated in that of Friso: a homosexual being married to a woman, experimenting with sexual preferences in the USA because it is ‘far from home’, the (danger of) being blackmailed and- on an even more sinister note- evidence of pedophilia and other forms of child abuse. Of course, these kind of allegations and stories are mostly impossible to verify for obvious reasons. But in the case of the Dutch royals there is much that can be established as fact concerning child-abuse and ritual, sometimes even sadistic maltreatment:
The great-grandfather from Friso’s mother’s side, a German prince named Hendrik, raped his own daughter, the mother of queen Beatrix, as a result of which a daughter was born. The father of Friso, Claus, was a homosexual who also used children for sexual pleasure. The lawyer of the Queen and main guardian of the crown prince, Friso’s brother, was a sadistic pedophile against whom even testimony of child executions exists.
Is it against this factual background, outrageous or beyond imagination, that recently a witness has come forward claiming –from first hand- that Friso was present at a satanic execution of a young woman in the province of Friesland in the night after queens day in 1999? This murder case –Marianne Vaatstra- is still the most high profile so-called ‘cold case’ in Dutch criminal history and it is established fact that the police is still doing everything to prevent the truth from surfacing, like smuggling the prime suspects out of the country just days after the murder took place.
Confessions of a Royal Hitman
Johan Friso is the grandson of Bilderberg-founder Bernhard and the son of queen Beatrix who, according to knowledgeable sources, holds the third position in the current Bilderberg hierarchy. Sources say Beatrix once took Friso with her to a Bilderberg meeting. This seems all the more factual as we take into consideration the strong –and up to now still largely unpublished- ties between Friso and prominent Bilderberger James Wolfensohn, former president of the World Bank, a prime Bilderberg-tool in establishing the NWO. Since 2006 Friso acts as managing director for Wolfensohn & Company in the London office of the firm. What exactly is this firm concocting in the ‘emerging market economies’? It advises and consults on behalf of ‘governments’ and ‘large corporations’ doing business there, according to the company’s website. A more accurate impression can no doubt be gained by reading John Perkin’s famous whistle-blower treatise Confessions of an Economic Hitman.
In short: with organizations like these it’s all about bringing weak countries into the NWO power-structure by ‘advising’ them to take on large loans –from the World Bank, the IMF, Goldman Sachs- that they can never pay back. The loaner then can lay hands on natural resources of the debtor, other valuable assets like harbors and airports and even exert political backing for NWO-related proposals in organizations like the UN and WTO. This is the game Perkins describes and Wolfensohn excels in, with the help of the Dutch prince Johan Friso of Oranje Nassau. Interestingly enough, this type of work of Friso as a ‘royal hitman’ is of exactly the same category as what his wife Mabel is doing as a party-girl for George Soros and for an organization named The Elders of which she is (since 2008) director, an ‘independent group of eminent global leaders’ brought together by Nelson Mandela with names such as Jimmy Carter, Kofi Annan and Desmond Tutu; this group ‘takes initiatives’ on behalf of countries like Sudan, Myanmar and Zimbabwe.
Big Bilderberg Brother is Watching You
We already mentioned Friso’s ties to the military-industrial complex through his activities for TNO Space that specializes in developing techniques for controlling the population from outer space. What can now also be revealed is that Friso in 2005 and 2006 has been a partner with venture capital investment firm Logispring in Geneva, Switzerland. This firm, led by a Dutchman named Frans van Schaik, is active on the same big brother-chessboard and invests in companies like Xterprise (Texas, USA) specializing in NWO dream-tools like RFID, or Radio Frequency Identification, a technique we already stumbled upon in the previous section on Constantijn. These activities of Friso have never been published by Dutch media outlets and have only become known through the website of Wolfensohn & Company short business biography of Friso. (click: “Investment team” and then “Friso van Oranje” through link provided). The same applies to Friso’s co-foundership of MRI Centre that excels in body scanning-techniques for the medical sector. The same Wolfensohn website also sheds some light on what Friso was doing with Goldman Sachs in London where he was executive director from 1998 to 2003. Friso was into investment banking in the sectors media and technology and was also assigned to Goldman Sachs Capital Partners, the private equity arm of Goldman Sachs. This banking conglomerate is these days considered as a criminal organization pur sang and countries like Spain, Greece and Germany have stopped doing business with Goldman’s suicide bankers, as they’ve been called by journalist Max Keiser. Currently GS is investing through its Capital Partners VI-fund (more than 20 billion dollars).
No doubt Friso was hired by GS to look for high potential possibilities in the field of big brother-technologies for optimizing the NWO control grid of the world population through micro-chipping, radio-tracking, body-scanning and satellite-spying.
William-Alexander of Orange-Nassau
Concluding, a word about the oldest brother: William-Alexander, heir to the throne, who accompanies his mother to the annual Bilderberg-meetings. He is certainly no stranger to the long-term ambitions of his family, but- as heir to the throne- keeps his actions much more in the dark than his two brothers. As he is subject to a high degree of scrutiny, this prince passes his time with ‘global water-management’ for the UN. And even in this apparently innocent day job, the prince can hardly refrain from pushing global governance. It’s in his blood, you might say. In a document prepared by the prince for the Johannesburg Summit, he states:
“The most important area of global governance with a substantial potential impact on the water sector is the system of international trade.”
Lamenting that: “The effort to develop a much-needed institutional framework for international water governance has met with resistance and been relatively unsuccessful”, the prince recommends to “Have the World Trade Organization develop and consider virtual water balances, using a resource accounting framework, when assessing and negotiating agriculture subsidies and trade in agricultural products.”
Here they go again, have the WTO strangle nation-states into submission by lending and retracting agricultural funding.
“In the international arena”, says the prince, “water has shown to be a good catalyst for cooperation between nations.”
At a 2004 meeting of the International Institute for Sustainable Development held at United Nations headquarters in New York, the prince of Orange sat side by side with Bilderberger and Executive Director of UNEP Klaus Töpfer, discussing the “overall review of implementation of Agenda 21.” This, by the way, is the same Töpfer that admitted to an “international consensus on worldwide population control” back in 2000.
In Conclusion
Slowly but surely a picture is emerging from the plethora of facts. Both prince’s former and current employers are without exception notorious and regular Bilderbergers: No doubt a big Bilderberg future lies ahead for both princes, sons of the current Bilderberg number three and grandsons of its founder.
Although the New World Order’s quest for total control of the world’s natural (and human) resources is one that spans many decades and even centuries, the latest generation is as fervent to accomplish the destruction of nation-states as their forefathers ever were. History points out to us that decisive developments and events are not simply the children of coincidence, they are brought about at the hands of ruling elites throughout the ages.
Micha Kat is an investigative journalist and the foremost Bilderberg-hunter in the Netherlands. His website is www.klokkenluideronline.nl.
Jurriaan Maessen is a writer and freelance investigative journalist.
MY VIEW ON OUR PRESIDENT, & CONGRESS
PART 3
By Gianni DeVincent Hayes, Ph.D
July 30, 2010
NewsWithViews.com
PART 3
By Gianni DeVincent Hayes, Ph.D
July 30, 2010
NewsWithViews.com
Thursday, July 29, 2010
Four Shocking Bombshells Bernanke Did NOT Tell Congress About Last Week
Four Shocking Bombshells Bernanke Did NOT Tell Congress About Last Week
by Martin D. Weiss, Ph.D. 07-26-10
In his testimony before Congress last week,
by Martin D. Weiss, Ph.D. 07-26-10
In his testimony before Congress last week,
Oil Used as a Pretext for Corexit?
July 28, 2010
by Ken Price
(for henrymakow.com)
The story from Mathew Simmons (that the oil well was never capped and was still raging at full speed) has been deemed to be a misleading fraud. [Price & Makow.com fell for it. Apologies] It looks like the purpose of his "disclosure" was to get us to believe that the major cause of death in the gulf region is from methane gas and abiotic oil, WHEN IN FACT, the cause of death is corexit.
It now looks like we do not have an oil leak at all but a tar leak. I will be following up on this, but as you continue reading you will find good reason to believe that what has actually been leaking is from an asphalt volcano, and this could have been a normal seepage of such material. Asphalt is consumed by microbes and does not pose a threat to the oceans nor sea life. In fact, it provides billions of lower food-chain building blocks.
So this is what we have left to go on at the moment:
1. Corexit is lethal. It has been tested in the Valdez disaster and it is known to dramatically reduce the lives of all humans who work around it and breathe it. It should never have been used again.
2. Continue to stay away from areas along the shoreline. Do not swim in the waters.
3. There is a massive media illusion being fed to the public. This has been brought to light by the following:
-Faked pictures of the well supposedly being capped.
-Faked pictures of the BP supposed "command center".
-Zero callbacks have been made from the supposed BP "help center"
-Ground cleanup crews leaving the scene within an hour of the president's departure of the area he visited.
-Up to two feet of hauled-in sand being dumped on beaches in front of resorts during the night for photo ops the next day looking ok.
-Public access denied at most beaches along with speaking with any cleanup workers, flying over the gulf region, photographing BP or workers, access to records (how much dispersants, what's in it, etc.).
-Few people know anything about thousands of workers who have become ill working along the shores and off shore in boats.
What a fact finding mess!
4. Very little oil has hit the Gulf coast beaches and this is after days of prevailing winds from the south. So if the oil was ever there in the first place, dispersant or not, it would be reaching the shores now. What has reached the shore has been mostly tar, and overall, after all this time, the amounts have been minuscule. Some of the pictures have shown the "oil" to be reddish, others have shown it to be white.
The latest hypothesis is this: The Deep Horizon's rig drilled through a clay deposit and an asphalt deposit. This means the event was way over-hyped, that there has never been a threat from a deep well that tapped into 100,000 psi pressure within the largest oil reserve ever found. It would also mean that we DO NOT have a massive flow of toxic abiotic oil killing our oceans. This could mean that this was a scare tactic fed to the public to cover (as a reason) for the use of the deadly corexit.
There is absolutely no reason that this area should be so shut off to visitors other than to hide from us what is really going on. There was no reason to allow BP to control this situation from the beginning, and over 80 days before the well was supposedly "capped", without every major world leader screaming for the United States to take immediate action to stop the poisoning of the world's seas. Unless there never really was such a threat. I repeat, we can not trust any information received via MSM. Photos and movies are easily faked.
I do not know what is really happening or what the plan is. From the looks of things currently it does resemble a hurricane Katrina scenario resulting in permanent evacuation/relocation of lower income people and a possible redevelopment of the region. It all depends on the extent of the damage, long term and short term, of the generously applied corexit. What we may have is a massive dumping of accumulated toxic waste directly into the workplace of hundreds of thousands unsuspecting residents of the gulf.
Other possible reasons include:
-To cause a moratorium on offshore drilling so they can cry about a shortage later (and raise the price) .
-To cause a cataclysmic event for use as a reason the US economy collapsed (Chernobyl proceeded the USSR collapse by about five years).
-To spread a bio disease (depopulation).
-To collapse the economy of the middle east which has loans of such magnitude that some of the countries need crude oil at over 100 dollars per barrel just to survive the interest. This "black eye" the oil industry must now bare could lead to reduced demand and reliance on petroleum (not one of my hypothesis).
-To force the world into changing energy sources. This way they could make us rebuild out transportation system all over again, and capitalize and tax us at every stage of the way. (I'd like to see the day!)
-To change the climate of the East Coast of the US and/or England, Holland, Netherlands, etc.
-To change the gulf stream currents.
-To give reason for "emergency intervention", coming in the form of military takeover (aka Haiti), this time on a larger scale including Cuba and all the islands of the gulf region.
As part of a larger world plan; there are now confirmed oil leaks in China, the North Sea, the Red Sea and now a pipeline rupture sending 840,000 gallons into the Kalamazoo River in Michigan.
"Why are oil spills suddenly occurring constantly, all over the world? Just this year, the environment has taken an unprecedented beating, from the oil industry alone." Meta Ocean Research
In my last update I mentioned that a second well has been leaking in the gulf near the Deepwater Horizon, and the size of the leak was only mentioned as "smaller than the Deepwater Horizon's leak". I am seeing a mass of confusion coming together in the coming days, and years from now they may be still denying that BP's nightmarish accident was the major cause of the disasters of the seas as seen from a world-wide perspective.
Are these latest incidents for the creation of "plausible deniability" or a much larger plan?
The search for the truth never stops. I hope this helps you in your search for it.
---
Latest on Corexit Damage
Is Matt Simmonds Credible?
http://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/Is-Matt-Simmons-Credible.html
July 28, 2010
by Ken Price
(for henrymakow.com)
The story from Mathew Simmons (that the oil well was never capped and was still raging at full speed) has been deemed to be a misleading fraud. [Price & Makow.com fell for it. Apologies] It looks like the purpose of his "disclosure" was to get us to believe that the major cause of death in the gulf region is from methane gas and abiotic oil, WHEN IN FACT, the cause of death is corexit.
It now looks like we do not have an oil leak at all but a tar leak. I will be following up on this, but as you continue reading you will find good reason to believe that what has actually been leaking is from an asphalt volcano, and this could have been a normal seepage of such material. Asphalt is consumed by microbes and does not pose a threat to the oceans nor sea life. In fact, it provides billions of lower food-chain building blocks.
So this is what we have left to go on at the moment:
1. Corexit is lethal. It has been tested in the Valdez disaster and it is known to dramatically reduce the lives of all humans who work around it and breathe it. It should never have been used again.
2. Continue to stay away from areas along the shoreline. Do not swim in the waters.
3. There is a massive media illusion being fed to the public. This has been brought to light by the following:
-Faked pictures of the well supposedly being capped.
-Faked pictures of the BP supposed "command center".
-Zero callbacks have been made from the supposed BP "help center"
-Ground cleanup crews leaving the scene within an hour of the president's departure of the area he visited.
-Up to two feet of hauled-in sand being dumped on beaches in front of resorts during the night for photo ops the next day looking ok.
-Public access denied at most beaches along with speaking with any cleanup workers, flying over the gulf region, photographing BP or workers, access to records (how much dispersants, what's in it, etc.).
-Few people know anything about thousands of workers who have become ill working along the shores and off shore in boats.
What a fact finding mess!
4. Very little oil has hit the Gulf coast beaches and this is after days of prevailing winds from the south. So if the oil was ever there in the first place, dispersant or not, it would be reaching the shores now. What has reached the shore has been mostly tar, and overall, after all this time, the amounts have been minuscule. Some of the pictures have shown the "oil" to be reddish, others have shown it to be white.
The latest hypothesis is this: The Deep Horizon's rig drilled through a clay deposit and an asphalt deposit. This means the event was way over-hyped, that there has never been a threat from a deep well that tapped into 100,000 psi pressure within the largest oil reserve ever found. It would also mean that we DO NOT have a massive flow of toxic abiotic oil killing our oceans. This could mean that this was a scare tactic fed to the public to cover (as a reason) for the use of the deadly corexit.
There is absolutely no reason that this area should be so shut off to visitors other than to hide from us what is really going on. There was no reason to allow BP to control this situation from the beginning, and over 80 days before the well was supposedly "capped", without every major world leader screaming for the United States to take immediate action to stop the poisoning of the world's seas. Unless there never really was such a threat. I repeat, we can not trust any information received via MSM. Photos and movies are easily faked.
I do not know what is really happening or what the plan is. From the looks of things currently it does resemble a hurricane Katrina scenario resulting in permanent evacuation/relocation of lower income people and a possible redevelopment of the region. It all depends on the extent of the damage, long term and short term, of the generously applied corexit. What we may have is a massive dumping of accumulated toxic waste directly into the workplace of hundreds of thousands unsuspecting residents of the gulf.
Other possible reasons include:
-To cause a moratorium on offshore drilling so they can cry about a shortage later (and raise the price) .
-To cause a cataclysmic event for use as a reason the US economy collapsed (Chernobyl proceeded the USSR collapse by about five years).
-To spread a bio disease (depopulation).
-To collapse the economy of the middle east which has loans of such magnitude that some of the countries need crude oil at over 100 dollars per barrel just to survive the interest. This "black eye" the oil industry must now bare could lead to reduced demand and reliance on petroleum (not one of my hypothesis).
-To force the world into changing energy sources. This way they could make us rebuild out transportation system all over again, and capitalize and tax us at every stage of the way. (I'd like to see the day!)
-To change the climate of the East Coast of the US and/or England, Holland, Netherlands, etc.
-To change the gulf stream currents.
-To give reason for "emergency intervention", coming in the form of military takeover (aka Haiti), this time on a larger scale including Cuba and all the islands of the gulf region.
As part of a larger world plan; there are now confirmed oil leaks in China, the North Sea, the Red Sea and now a pipeline rupture sending 840,000 gallons into the Kalamazoo River in Michigan.
"Why are oil spills suddenly occurring constantly, all over the world? Just this year, the environment has taken an unprecedented beating, from the oil industry alone." Meta Ocean Research
In my last update I mentioned that a second well has been leaking in the gulf near the Deepwater Horizon, and the size of the leak was only mentioned as "smaller than the Deepwater Horizon's leak". I am seeing a mass of confusion coming together in the coming days, and years from now they may be still denying that BP's nightmarish accident was the major cause of the disasters of the seas as seen from a world-wide perspective.
Are these latest incidents for the creation of "plausible deniability" or a much larger plan?
The search for the truth never stops. I hope this helps you in your search for it.
---
Latest on Corexit Damage
Is Matt Simmonds Credible?
http://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/Is-Matt-Simmons-Credible.html
Now We Know It's War
Now We Know It's War
By Richard Eastmen
7-28-10
"In Southwest Michigan, a state of emergency has been declared in response to the Kalamazoo River oil spill. At 9:45 a.m. on Monday morning, an oil pipeline began leaking."
Residents are already reporting heavy fumes and oil-coated wildlife along the waterways from pipeline which has been carrying crude from Griffith, Ind., to Sarnia, Ontario. The well has not been shut down. 819,000 gallons have been spilled into the Lake Michigan as of Wednesday morning. Other experts have put the number at 1,000,000 gallons or more No action is being taken to shut down the well. The fresh water lake is not the Gulf, we are already nearing Gulf concentration proportions. And the oil is passing mixing with toxic chemicals.
"In Southwest Michigan, a state of emergency has been declared in response to the Kalamazoo River oil spill. At 9:45 a.m. on Monday morning, an oil pipeline began leaking."
The oil is flowing through the region of the Kalamazoo River Superfund cleanup site. The polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs found in the superfund site will react with the chemicals that evaporate off the oil. This could cause very dangerous toxic fumes. The EPA has not committed to assistance. The governor has not ordered a shut-down and is only asking for cleanup help -- while the oil is still flowing.
The well is owned by a Texas company, Enbridge Energy -- but who owns that company remains to be seen.
This event, a disastrous spill of unexplained origin, that is poisoning one of the Great Lakes with no circulation other than through evaporation, with all of the pattern of official incompetence boardering on encouragement of the progression of the disaster which we have seen in the Gulf of Mexico attack (yes, both events are attacks on the American people -- they no longer can conceal that they are destroying us by indirect stealth-environmental warfare means, so now they must finish us fast before we can gather out wits, organize and interfere with the plans.
People of Michgan and Illinois and Wisconsin to the west of the lake, take to the streets and raise their voices immediatlely to force their governor and the federal government to take action.
Begin massive demonstrations now -- everyone. The militias must realize that their guns are useless. Rothschild-Rockefeller have chosen a chemical attack. ALready there is going to be a lot of loss from damage already done. Remember, no one has stopped the well yet. This can only be intentional -- letting it happen, like letting the Pentagon get hit on 9-11.
Forget everything you hear on Fox news. Talk to your neighbor about how you will make public opinion known to the world.
The nation must demonstrate all together -- forgetting every difference or race, party, position, religion or any other consideration We must as a nation demand before the eyes of the world that the People of the US demand that the Rothschilds and their criminal allies around the world stop waging war against the American people. Stop this attack on Lake Michigan and stop all other planned attacks against other regions of the US and other countries.
There is not room for questioning. The pollution of Lake Michigan while the posioning of the Gulf of Mexico is still continuing -- makes it certain -- as we became certain that 9-11 was not accidental when the second tower was also hit by a plane. The plan is to poison the heartland of the US -- the populist middle -- the land of militias and ol southern boys who are such good shots etc. Trust you mind -- don't look for truth from Fox or CNN or national public radio. All of those information sources are in enemy hands and have been for a long time. I am asking you to trust me this time -- and take the action I am asking you to take.
It is the responsiblity of the rest of mankind to stand behind the efforts of the American people -- we are a people of all races and creeds -- to overthrow the criminals who would rule the world with ruthless oppression.
Please do more than simply pass this information on. You must know, you must pass the word, then you must organize and fight and do so immediately.
Richard Eastman
richardeastmanyakima@q.com
By Richard Eastmen
7-28-10
"In Southwest Michigan, a state of emergency has been declared in response to the Kalamazoo River oil spill. At 9:45 a.m. on Monday morning, an oil pipeline began leaking."
Residents are already reporting heavy fumes and oil-coated wildlife along the waterways from pipeline which has been carrying crude from Griffith, Ind., to Sarnia, Ontario. The well has not been shut down. 819,000 gallons have been spilled into the Lake Michigan as of Wednesday morning. Other experts have put the number at 1,000,000 gallons or more No action is being taken to shut down the well. The fresh water lake is not the Gulf, we are already nearing Gulf concentration proportions. And the oil is passing mixing with toxic chemicals.
"In Southwest Michigan, a state of emergency has been declared in response to the Kalamazoo River oil spill. At 9:45 a.m. on Monday morning, an oil pipeline began leaking."
The oil is flowing through the region of the Kalamazoo River Superfund cleanup site. The polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs found in the superfund site will react with the chemicals that evaporate off the oil. This could cause very dangerous toxic fumes. The EPA has not committed to assistance. The governor has not ordered a shut-down and is only asking for cleanup help -- while the oil is still flowing.
The well is owned by a Texas company, Enbridge Energy -- but who owns that company remains to be seen.
This event, a disastrous spill of unexplained origin, that is poisoning one of the Great Lakes with no circulation other than through evaporation, with all of the pattern of official incompetence boardering on encouragement of the progression of the disaster which we have seen in the Gulf of Mexico attack (yes, both events are attacks on the American people -- they no longer can conceal that they are destroying us by indirect stealth-environmental warfare means, so now they must finish us fast before we can gather out wits, organize and interfere with the plans.
People of Michgan and Illinois and Wisconsin to the west of the lake, take to the streets and raise their voices immediatlely to force their governor and the federal government to take action.
Begin massive demonstrations now -- everyone. The militias must realize that their guns are useless. Rothschild-Rockefeller have chosen a chemical attack. ALready there is going to be a lot of loss from damage already done. Remember, no one has stopped the well yet. This can only be intentional -- letting it happen, like letting the Pentagon get hit on 9-11.
Forget everything you hear on Fox news. Talk to your neighbor about how you will make public opinion known to the world.
The nation must demonstrate all together -- forgetting every difference or race, party, position, religion or any other consideration We must as a nation demand before the eyes of the world that the People of the US demand that the Rothschilds and their criminal allies around the world stop waging war against the American people. Stop this attack on Lake Michigan and stop all other planned attacks against other regions of the US and other countries.
There is not room for questioning. The pollution of Lake Michigan while the posioning of the Gulf of Mexico is still continuing -- makes it certain -- as we became certain that 9-11 was not accidental when the second tower was also hit by a plane. The plan is to poison the heartland of the US -- the populist middle -- the land of militias and ol southern boys who are such good shots etc. Trust you mind -- don't look for truth from Fox or CNN or national public radio. All of those information sources are in enemy hands and have been for a long time. I am asking you to trust me this time -- and take the action I am asking you to take.
It is the responsiblity of the rest of mankind to stand behind the efforts of the American people -- we are a people of all races and creeds -- to overthrow the criminals who would rule the world with ruthless oppression.
Please do more than simply pass this information on. You must know, you must pass the word, then you must organize and fight and do so immediately.
Richard Eastman
richardeastmanyakima@q.com
Wednesday, July 28, 2010
Socially active environment can cause cancer tumors to shrink and even disappear
Socially active environment can cause cancer tumors to shrink and even disappear
Wednesday, July 28, 2010 by: S. L. Baker, features writer
(NaturalNews) If you or someone you know ever receives a cancer diagnosis, especially one that is labeled "incurable" or fatal, take heart in the fact spontaneous regression (remission) has been reported in the medical literature numerous times for virtually all cancers. Spontaneous regression has been documented most often in neuroblastoma, renal cell carcinoma, lymphoma and malignant melanoma. And, as NaturalNews has previous reported, scientists have also discovered recently that some invasive breast cancers appear to simply go away on their own (http://www.naturalnews.com/024901.html). Now comes research from Ohio State University that could help explain what triggers spontaneous remissions.
The new study, published in the July 9th issues of the journal Cell found that when mice with cancer were given enriched living conditions and a boost in their social life, their tumors shrank -- and some of their cancers disappeared completely. That's powerful evidence, the scientists say, that social connections and an individual's mental state, play an important role in the way the body responds to malignancies. "Animals' interaction with the environment has a profound influence on the growth of cancer -- more than we knew was possible," Matthew During, who headed the study, said in a statement to the press.
The lab rodents were originally housed in groups of about five, given all the food they wanted and allowed to play all day. However, for the research project, mice with cancer were placed in an even better, enriched environment. They had bigger living groups with 15 to 20 other animals to interact with. They also had more space and extra toys, hiding places and running wheels.
During and his colleague, Lei Cao, found that malignant tumors in animals living in this enriched environment started to shrink. In fact, tumors decreased by an impressive 77 percent in mass and decreased in volume by 43 percent, the researchers report. Moreover, five percent of mice with cancer showed no evidence of the disease at all after just three weeks of living in their new home. That seemingly spontaneous cancer cure never happened in control animals kept in standard housing.
So what specifically is going on here that impacts cancer? Animals in a regular mice environment in the lab who exercised more didn't experience improvements in their cancer, so the scientists say more exercise isn't the total explanation. Instead, they think the complex social dimension in the new living arrangement was apparently the key.
The enriched living environment appears to have sparked more, but apparently cancer-fighting, stress in the cancer-stricken mice. The animals showed higher levels of stress hormones called glucocorticoids. What this means, the researchers said in statement to the media, is that low levels of stress, or certain kinds of stress, are probably beneficial.
"A lot of people think stress is bad, but our data show the animals aren't just happy. Antidepressants won't give you the same effect," the scientists said in the press statement. "The goal isn't to minimize stress, but to live a richer life, socially and physically. You want to be challenged."
In addition, the rodents had lower levels of a hormone produced by fat called leptin, indicative of a significant shift in metabolism. Their immune systems also appeared to be "ramped up a bit," During said.
During and his colleague pinned down an increase in a growth factor expressed in the hypothalamus called brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in the mice living in the improved mouse environment. Further study revealed that manipulations designed to increase BDNF levels also reduced tumor burden. If animals lacked BDNF, the benefits of an enriched environment were not apparent.
The findings could ultimately lead to advances in the way cancer and other diseases are treated -- perhaps through environmental modifications that offer mental and social stimulation. "We're really showing that you can't look at a disease like cancer in isolation," During said in the media statement. "For too long, physicians and others have stuck to what they know -- surgery, chemo, radiotherapy. Traditionally working on the area of lifestyle and the brain has been a 'soft area'. This paper really suggests if we look at people more in terms of their perceptions of disease, their social interactions and environment, we could realize a profound influence on cancer..."
For more information:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/...
http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/co...
http://yalepress.typepad.com/fighti...
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Sp...
Wednesday, July 28, 2010 by: S. L. Baker, features writer
(NaturalNews) If you or someone you know ever receives a cancer diagnosis, especially one that is labeled "incurable" or fatal, take heart in the fact spontaneous regression (remission) has been reported in the medical literature numerous times for virtually all cancers. Spontaneous regression has been documented most often in neuroblastoma, renal cell carcinoma, lymphoma and malignant melanoma. And, as NaturalNews has previous reported, scientists have also discovered recently that some invasive breast cancers appear to simply go away on their own (http://www.naturalnews.com/024901.html). Now comes research from Ohio State University that could help explain what triggers spontaneous remissions.
The new study, published in the July 9th issues of the journal Cell found that when mice with cancer were given enriched living conditions and a boost in their social life, their tumors shrank -- and some of their cancers disappeared completely. That's powerful evidence, the scientists say, that social connections and an individual's mental state, play an important role in the way the body responds to malignancies. "Animals' interaction with the environment has a profound influence on the growth of cancer -- more than we knew was possible," Matthew During, who headed the study, said in a statement to the press.
The lab rodents were originally housed in groups of about five, given all the food they wanted and allowed to play all day. However, for the research project, mice with cancer were placed in an even better, enriched environment. They had bigger living groups with 15 to 20 other animals to interact with. They also had more space and extra toys, hiding places and running wheels.
During and his colleague, Lei Cao, found that malignant tumors in animals living in this enriched environment started to shrink. In fact, tumors decreased by an impressive 77 percent in mass and decreased in volume by 43 percent, the researchers report. Moreover, five percent of mice with cancer showed no evidence of the disease at all after just three weeks of living in their new home. That seemingly spontaneous cancer cure never happened in control animals kept in standard housing.
So what specifically is going on here that impacts cancer? Animals in a regular mice environment in the lab who exercised more didn't experience improvements in their cancer, so the scientists say more exercise isn't the total explanation. Instead, they think the complex social dimension in the new living arrangement was apparently the key.
The enriched living environment appears to have sparked more, but apparently cancer-fighting, stress in the cancer-stricken mice. The animals showed higher levels of stress hormones called glucocorticoids. What this means, the researchers said in statement to the media, is that low levels of stress, or certain kinds of stress, are probably beneficial.
"A lot of people think stress is bad, but our data show the animals aren't just happy. Antidepressants won't give you the same effect," the scientists said in the press statement. "The goal isn't to minimize stress, but to live a richer life, socially and physically. You want to be challenged."
In addition, the rodents had lower levels of a hormone produced by fat called leptin, indicative of a significant shift in metabolism. Their immune systems also appeared to be "ramped up a bit," During said.
During and his colleague pinned down an increase in a growth factor expressed in the hypothalamus called brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in the mice living in the improved mouse environment. Further study revealed that manipulations designed to increase BDNF levels also reduced tumor burden. If animals lacked BDNF, the benefits of an enriched environment were not apparent.
The findings could ultimately lead to advances in the way cancer and other diseases are treated -- perhaps through environmental modifications that offer mental and social stimulation. "We're really showing that you can't look at a disease like cancer in isolation," During said in the media statement. "For too long, physicians and others have stuck to what they know -- surgery, chemo, radiotherapy. Traditionally working on the area of lifestyle and the brain has been a 'soft area'. This paper really suggests if we look at people more in terms of their perceptions of disease, their social interactions and environment, we could realize a profound influence on cancer..."
For more information:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/...
http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/co...
http://yalepress.typepad.com/fighti...
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Sp...
Queen Elizabeth Fronts for Rothschilds ("Crown")
July 27, 2010
Queen Elizabeth Fronts for Rothschilds ("Crown")
By Alcuin Bramerton
(for henrymakow.com)
It is accurate to posit that Australia, New Zealand and Canada are not independent, sovereign countries. However, these nations are not owned and run by the UK; they are owned and run by the House of Windsor Crown Temple syndicate within the City of London Corporation. The head signatory of the Crown Temple syndicate is Elizabeth Windsor (Queen Elizabeth II of England).
It should not be forgotten that the most powerful financial syndicate in the Western World is that of the European Rothschilds. The Rothschilds, because of their power base inside the City of London Corporation, have a controlling membership of the London Crown Temple syndicate, and they also have executive control of the Vatican and the Mafia though the P2 Masonic Lodge in Italy.
The financial affairs of the new UK coalition government in London are also Rothschild-controlled. The line management here is understood to be Jacob Rothschild > Nathaniel Rothschild (N.M.Rothschild & Sons Limited, New Court, St Swithin's Lane, London EC4P 4DU) > Oliver Letwin > George Osborne (British Chancellor of the Exchequer).
Queen Elizabeth II fronts for the Rothschilds. She is the largest landowner on Earth. She is Head of State of the United Kingdom and of thirty one other states and territories, and is the legal owner of 6,600 million acres of land, one sixth of the Earth's land surface. A conservative estimate of the value of the Crown Temple syndicate's land holding, under the Queen's signature, is £17.6 trillion.
The Queen's syndicate land holdings are based on the laws of the countries she owns and her land title is valid in each of those countries. Her main holdings are Canada, the 2nd largest country on Earth, with 2,467 million acres, Australia, the 7th largest country on Earth with 1,900 million acres, Papua New Guinea with114 million acres, New Zealand with 66 million acres, and the UK with 60 million acres.
Elizabeth Windsor and her covert syndicate in London are the world's largest landowners by a significant margin. The next largest landowner is the Russian state, with an overall ownership of 4,219 million acres, and a direct ownership comparable with the Queen's land holding of 2,447 million acres. The 3rd largest landowner is the Chinese state, which claims all of Chinese land, about 2,365 million acres.
The 4th largest landowner on Earth is often said to be the Federal Government of the United States, which owns about one third of the land area of the USA, 760 million acres. However, this Washington DC private corporation Federal Estate is actually owned and controlled by the London Crown Temple syndicate. Indeed, at the present time, the London syndicate in partnership with an old family Chinese syndicate, hold, and have activated, a $47 trillion World Court Writ of Execution and Lien on the US Treasury and the US Federal Reserve Board.
The five largest "personal" landowners on Earth, at present, are Queen Elizabeth II of England (6,600 million acres), King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia (553 million acres), King Bhumibol of Thailand (126 million acres), King Mohammed IV of Morocco (113 million acres) and Sultan Quaboos of Oman (76 million acres). In reality, however, these named individuals are just the head signatories of old bloodline syndicates which act corporately through hidden family trusts.
More historical and current background about Elizabeth Windsor (Queen Elizabeth II of England) is compiled here:
http://engforum.pravda.ru/showthread.php?t=265271
Queen Elizabeth Fronts for Rothschilds ("Crown")
By Alcuin Bramerton
(for henrymakow.com)
It is accurate to posit that Australia, New Zealand and Canada are not independent, sovereign countries. However, these nations are not owned and run by the UK; they are owned and run by the House of Windsor Crown Temple syndicate within the City of London Corporation. The head signatory of the Crown Temple syndicate is Elizabeth Windsor (Queen Elizabeth II of England).
It should not be forgotten that the most powerful financial syndicate in the Western World is that of the European Rothschilds. The Rothschilds, because of their power base inside the City of London Corporation, have a controlling membership of the London Crown Temple syndicate, and they also have executive control of the Vatican and the Mafia though the P2 Masonic Lodge in Italy.
The financial affairs of the new UK coalition government in London are also Rothschild-controlled. The line management here is understood to be Jacob Rothschild > Nathaniel Rothschild (N.M.Rothschild & Sons Limited, New Court, St Swithin's Lane, London EC4P 4DU) > Oliver Letwin > George Osborne (British Chancellor of the Exchequer).
Queen Elizabeth II fronts for the Rothschilds. She is the largest landowner on Earth. She is Head of State of the United Kingdom and of thirty one other states and territories, and is the legal owner of 6,600 million acres of land, one sixth of the Earth's land surface. A conservative estimate of the value of the Crown Temple syndicate's land holding, under the Queen's signature, is £17.6 trillion.
The Queen's syndicate land holdings are based on the laws of the countries she owns and her land title is valid in each of those countries. Her main holdings are Canada, the 2nd largest country on Earth, with 2,467 million acres, Australia, the 7th largest country on Earth with 1,900 million acres, Papua New Guinea with114 million acres, New Zealand with 66 million acres, and the UK with 60 million acres.
Elizabeth Windsor and her covert syndicate in London are the world's largest landowners by a significant margin. The next largest landowner is the Russian state, with an overall ownership of 4,219 million acres, and a direct ownership comparable with the Queen's land holding of 2,447 million acres. The 3rd largest landowner is the Chinese state, which claims all of Chinese land, about 2,365 million acres.
The 4th largest landowner on Earth is often said to be the Federal Government of the United States, which owns about one third of the land area of the USA, 760 million acres. However, this Washington DC private corporation Federal Estate is actually owned and controlled by the London Crown Temple syndicate. Indeed, at the present time, the London syndicate in partnership with an old family Chinese syndicate, hold, and have activated, a $47 trillion World Court Writ of Execution and Lien on the US Treasury and the US Federal Reserve Board.
The five largest "personal" landowners on Earth, at present, are Queen Elizabeth II of England (6,600 million acres), King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia (553 million acres), King Bhumibol of Thailand (126 million acres), King Mohammed IV of Morocco (113 million acres) and Sultan Quaboos of Oman (76 million acres). In reality, however, these named individuals are just the head signatories of old bloodline syndicates which act corporately through hidden family trusts.
More historical and current background about Elizabeth Windsor (Queen Elizabeth II of England) is compiled here:
http://engforum.pravda.ru/showthread.php?t=265271
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
Congressman: BP made Gulf “a toxic bowl” that will “haunt this region” for years, “All of that oil is still under the surface” (VIDEO)
Congressman: BP made Gulf “a toxic bowl” that will “haunt this region” for years, “All of that oil is still under the surface” (VIDEO)
The IPCC, Climate Change and Solar Sophistry
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/25864
Sins Of Omission and Commission
The IPCC, Climate Change and Solar Sophistry
By Dr. Tim Ball Tuesday, July 27, 2010
Give light, and the darkness will disappear of itself. Erasmus (1466 - 1536)
Control of the science and content of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Reports was planned from before it was officially formed in 1988. Exposure of manipulation to achieve desired results also began early.
Benjamin Santer graduated from the Climatic Research Unit (CRU), where Tom Wigley supervised his PhD. He returned to the US working at the government’s Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. He was appointed lead author of Chapter 8, titled “Detection of Climate Change and Attribution of Causes” of the 1995 IPCC Report. It turned out Santer had significantly altered the meaning of the Chapter from that agreed on by the other authors. As Avery and Singer noted in 2006, “Santer single-handedly reversed the ‘climate science’ of the whole IPCC report and with it the global warming political process! The ‘discernible human influence’ supposedly revealed by the IPCC has been cited thousands of times since in media around the world, and has been the ‘stopper’ in millions of debates among nonscientists.”
An Incestuous Process
Overlooked in exposure of Santer’s malfeasance was the fact that the entire chapter was based primarily on two of his research papers, neither of which was published or peer-reviewed at the time. IPCC chapters list extensive bibliographies, but invariably content is dependent on the work of the lead-author. As Marcel Crok explained, “lead authors are promoting their own work in the chapters and are often asked to give an ‘objective’ opinion about controversies in which they themselves are involved. A clear example of this in AR4 is Phil Jones who promotes his HadCrut3 graph meanwhile ignoring literature (Michaels/McKitrick 2004, 2006) that raises serious questions about the reliability of this graph. A second example is Briffa as lead author of chapter 3, where he, as a member of the Hockey Team, defends the hockey stick, and ignores the divergence problem (i.e. the fact that his temperature reconstruction based on tree rings is going down after 1960).” It is a logical development of the incestuous design of the IPCC process.
A Czech researcher only recently exposed the worst example of this conflict. He calls it Judithgate after Judith Lean co-lead author of Chapter 2 of the 2007 IPCC Report. Section 2.7.1 is titled “Solar variability” and purports to be the work of several researchers according to the bibliography. Actually, the section is dependent on one paper. Lean J., Roltmann G., Harder J., Kopp G.: Source contributions to new understanding of global change and solar variability, Sol. Phys., 230, 27-53, 2005. As a Norwegian government independent reviewer wrote to the IPCC. “I urge IPCC to consider having only one solar physicist on the lead author team of such an important chapter. In particular since the conclusion of this section hangs on one single paper in which Judith Lean is the co-author.” Note the comment “Confidential, Do Not Cite, Quote or Distribute.” Why is this necessary for a publicly funded project that has massive global economic implications? Steve McIntyre obtained the information through a Freedom of Information (FOI) request.
More disturbing was the disclosure that Lean and Claus Frohlich had altered graphs to reduce solar influence. “The original satellite data showed, that TSI (measured in Watts) increased from 1986 to 1996 by cca one third… But then Judith and Clause “laundered” the graphs and voila… solar output increase was gone.” Why was any of this necessary? (Link)
Sins Of Omission and Commission
Deception of claiming Reports are complete synopses of scientific literature produced by a team of experts is enough to reject the entire IPCC findings. However it’s only a part because what they chose to cover was deliberately selective. It was driven by the IPCC objective to prove human CO2 is causing global warming. Computer models and historical data were manipulated to prove CO2 was the only possible cause. This required omitting or reducing to a minimum the role of other mechanisms. Biggest threat to their claims was the Sun and just as they rewrote climate history by eliminating the Medieval Warm Period (MWP), they rewrote a small portion of the solar record and left out most of the major solar mechanisms that cause climate change.
The Lean paper only considered changes in electromagnetic energy and because of what they produced the 2007 Report concludes. “In comparison, changes in solar irradiance since 1750 are estimated to have caused a small radiative forcing of +0.12 [+0.06 to +0.30] W/m2, which is less than half the estimate given in the TAR.” Prior to the adjustment the IPCC said changes in solar energy explained over 50 percent of temperature variation prior to 1950. But it’s only part of the story that is more easily told by considering long-term climate changes linked to other changes in the Sun and Sun/Earth relationships.
The most recent ice maximum occurred 20,000 years ago, but few are aware that similar maxima and minima occurred over a 3 million year period called the Pleistocene Ice Age. Variations between glacial and interglacial are primarily driven by the 100,000 - year oscillation of the elliptical orbit of the Sun, a major part of the Milankovitch cycle. Few know there were at least five previous Ice Ages that appear to relate to the 220 million year orbit of the Sun around the Milky Way. These processes are still operating, but the IPCC ignore them ostensibly because of the time scale. However, as the late Theodore Landscheidt showed there are short-term impacts of solar movements on cyclical events like El Nino.
There are a multitude of other astrophysical relationships causing cycles related to climate not considered by the IPCC.
Finally, there’s the relationship between sunspot and global temperature. The IPCC consistently ignore the relationship though there’s extensive literature beginning with Galileo’s observations of sunspots in 1610. Initially they said there was no explanatory mechanism. This is not a valid reason if you are doing a complete summary of climate science. Svensmark’s plausible Cosmic Theory appeared in embryonic form in 1991 and more completely in 1996. The 2001 Report mentioned it briefly, but it’s omitted in the 2007 Report. Now there is further confirmation of the theory. Eigil Friis-Christensen, director of the Danish National Space Institute, DTU, and co-author with Svensmark in 1996 said, “The evidence has piled up, first for the link between cosmic rays and low-level clouds and then, by experiment and observation, for the mechanism involving aerosols. All these consistent scientific results illustrate that the current climate models used to predict future climate are lacking important parts of the physics”
Of course they do, because they were designed to prove CO2 was the cause and therefore the problem.
Sins Of Omission and Commission
The IPCC, Climate Change and Solar Sophistry
By Dr. Tim Ball Tuesday, July 27, 2010
Give light, and the darkness will disappear of itself. Erasmus (1466 - 1536)
Control of the science and content of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Reports was planned from before it was officially formed in 1988. Exposure of manipulation to achieve desired results also began early.
Benjamin Santer graduated from the Climatic Research Unit (CRU), where Tom Wigley supervised his PhD. He returned to the US working at the government’s Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. He was appointed lead author of Chapter 8, titled “Detection of Climate Change and Attribution of Causes” of the 1995 IPCC Report. It turned out Santer had significantly altered the meaning of the Chapter from that agreed on by the other authors. As Avery and Singer noted in 2006, “Santer single-handedly reversed the ‘climate science’ of the whole IPCC report and with it the global warming political process! The ‘discernible human influence’ supposedly revealed by the IPCC has been cited thousands of times since in media around the world, and has been the ‘stopper’ in millions of debates among nonscientists.”
An Incestuous Process
Overlooked in exposure of Santer’s malfeasance was the fact that the entire chapter was based primarily on two of his research papers, neither of which was published or peer-reviewed at the time. IPCC chapters list extensive bibliographies, but invariably content is dependent on the work of the lead-author. As Marcel Crok explained, “lead authors are promoting their own work in the chapters and are often asked to give an ‘objective’ opinion about controversies in which they themselves are involved. A clear example of this in AR4 is Phil Jones who promotes his HadCrut3 graph meanwhile ignoring literature (Michaels/McKitrick 2004, 2006) that raises serious questions about the reliability of this graph. A second example is Briffa as lead author of chapter 3, where he, as a member of the Hockey Team, defends the hockey stick, and ignores the divergence problem (i.e. the fact that his temperature reconstruction based on tree rings is going down after 1960).” It is a logical development of the incestuous design of the IPCC process.
A Czech researcher only recently exposed the worst example of this conflict. He calls it Judithgate after Judith Lean co-lead author of Chapter 2 of the 2007 IPCC Report. Section 2.7.1 is titled “Solar variability” and purports to be the work of several researchers according to the bibliography. Actually, the section is dependent on one paper. Lean J., Roltmann G., Harder J., Kopp G.: Source contributions to new understanding of global change and solar variability, Sol. Phys., 230, 27-53, 2005. As a Norwegian government independent reviewer wrote to the IPCC. “I urge IPCC to consider having only one solar physicist on the lead author team of such an important chapter. In particular since the conclusion of this section hangs on one single paper in which Judith Lean is the co-author.” Note the comment “Confidential, Do Not Cite, Quote or Distribute.” Why is this necessary for a publicly funded project that has massive global economic implications? Steve McIntyre obtained the information through a Freedom of Information (FOI) request.
More disturbing was the disclosure that Lean and Claus Frohlich had altered graphs to reduce solar influence. “The original satellite data showed, that TSI (measured in Watts) increased from 1986 to 1996 by cca one third… But then Judith and Clause “laundered” the graphs and voila… solar output increase was gone.” Why was any of this necessary? (Link)
Sins Of Omission and Commission
Deception of claiming Reports are complete synopses of scientific literature produced by a team of experts is enough to reject the entire IPCC findings. However it’s only a part because what they chose to cover was deliberately selective. It was driven by the IPCC objective to prove human CO2 is causing global warming. Computer models and historical data were manipulated to prove CO2 was the only possible cause. This required omitting or reducing to a minimum the role of other mechanisms. Biggest threat to their claims was the Sun and just as they rewrote climate history by eliminating the Medieval Warm Period (MWP), they rewrote a small portion of the solar record and left out most of the major solar mechanisms that cause climate change.
The Lean paper only considered changes in electromagnetic energy and because of what they produced the 2007 Report concludes. “In comparison, changes in solar irradiance since 1750 are estimated to have caused a small radiative forcing of +0.12 [+0.06 to +0.30] W/m2, which is less than half the estimate given in the TAR.” Prior to the adjustment the IPCC said changes in solar energy explained over 50 percent of temperature variation prior to 1950. But it’s only part of the story that is more easily told by considering long-term climate changes linked to other changes in the Sun and Sun/Earth relationships.
The most recent ice maximum occurred 20,000 years ago, but few are aware that similar maxima and minima occurred over a 3 million year period called the Pleistocene Ice Age. Variations between glacial and interglacial are primarily driven by the 100,000 - year oscillation of the elliptical orbit of the Sun, a major part of the Milankovitch cycle. Few know there were at least five previous Ice Ages that appear to relate to the 220 million year orbit of the Sun around the Milky Way. These processes are still operating, but the IPCC ignore them ostensibly because of the time scale. However, as the late Theodore Landscheidt showed there are short-term impacts of solar movements on cyclical events like El Nino.
There are a multitude of other astrophysical relationships causing cycles related to climate not considered by the IPCC.
Finally, there’s the relationship between sunspot and global temperature. The IPCC consistently ignore the relationship though there’s extensive literature beginning with Galileo’s observations of sunspots in 1610. Initially they said there was no explanatory mechanism. This is not a valid reason if you are doing a complete summary of climate science. Svensmark’s plausible Cosmic Theory appeared in embryonic form in 1991 and more completely in 1996. The 2001 Report mentioned it briefly, but it’s omitted in the 2007 Report. Now there is further confirmation of the theory. Eigil Friis-Christensen, director of the Danish National Space Institute, DTU, and co-author with Svensmark in 1996 said, “The evidence has piled up, first for the link between cosmic rays and low-level clouds and then, by experiment and observation, for the mechanism involving aerosols. All these consistent scientific results illustrate that the current climate models used to predict future climate are lacking important parts of the physics”
Of course they do, because they were designed to prove CO2 was the cause and therefore the problem.
Axe falls on NHS services
Axe falls on NHS services
NHS bosses have drawn up secret plans for sweeping cuts to services, with restrictions on the most basic treatments for the sick and injured.
NHS bosses have drawn up secret plans for sweeping cuts to services, with restrictions on the most basic treatments for the sick and injured.
Scientists discover olive oil directly impacts genes to halt inflammation
Scientists discover olive oil directly impacts genes to halt inflammation
Tuesday, July 27, 2010 by: S. L. Baker, features writer
(NaturalNews) Research has been steadily accumulating that olive oil, a main component of the Mediterranean diet, has extensive health-protective properties. For example, phytonutrient components of olive oil have been found to be effective against breast cancer cells (http://www.naturalnews.com/025633_c...) and studies suggest the abundance of olive oil in the Mediterranean style of eating may be the reason that diet helps prevent depression (http://www.naturalnews.com/027265_d...). Now scientists have discovered that phenolic compounds in olive oil directly repress genes linked to inflammation.
This could be especially important in halting the dangerous effects of metabolic syndrome. Characterized by excess abdominal fat, high cholesterol, high blood pressure and high blood glucose levels, metabolic syndrome is linked to type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and early death.
Research published in the journal BMC Genomics investigated changes in genes mediated by olive oil phenols (which are most abundant in the extra-virgin varieties of olive oil). The double-blind, randomized study, headed by Francisco Perez-Jimenez from the University of Cordoba, involved 20 research subjects, all with metabolic syndrome. For six weeks, the patients did not take any supplements or drugs and they were all placed on similar low-fat, carbohydrate-rich diets. Then, for breakfast, they ate either a breakfast containing virgin olive oil with a high content of phenolic compounds or a similar breakfast with low phenol content.
The research team took blood samples after the meals to check for the expression of over 15,000 human genes. The results? The high phenol olive oil clearly impacted the regulation of almost 100 genes -- many of which have been linked to obesity, high blood fat levels, type 2 diabetes and heart disease.
"We identified 98 differentially expressed genes when comparing the intake of phenol-rich olive oil with low-phenol olive oil. Several of the repressed genes are known to be involved in pro-inflammatory processes, suggesting that the diet can switch the activity of immune system cells to a less deleterious inflammatory profile, as seen in metabolic syndrome," Dr. Perez-Jimenez said in a statement to the press. "These findings strengthen the relationship between inflammation, obesity and diet and provide evidence at the most basic level of healthy effects derived from virgin olive oil consumption in humans."
The ability of olive oil's phenolic compounds to reduce or prevent inflammation also provides a molecular basis for the reduction of heart disease observed in Mediterranean countries, where virgin olive oil represents a main source of dietary fat.
For more information:
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2...
http://www.naturalnews.com/olive_oi...
Tuesday, July 27, 2010 by: S. L. Baker, features writer
(NaturalNews) Research has been steadily accumulating that olive oil, a main component of the Mediterranean diet, has extensive health-protective properties. For example, phytonutrient components of olive oil have been found to be effective against breast cancer cells (http://www.naturalnews.com/025633_c...) and studies suggest the abundance of olive oil in the Mediterranean style of eating may be the reason that diet helps prevent depression (http://www.naturalnews.com/027265_d...). Now scientists have discovered that phenolic compounds in olive oil directly repress genes linked to inflammation.
This could be especially important in halting the dangerous effects of metabolic syndrome. Characterized by excess abdominal fat, high cholesterol, high blood pressure and high blood glucose levels, metabolic syndrome is linked to type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and early death.
Research published in the journal BMC Genomics investigated changes in genes mediated by olive oil phenols (which are most abundant in the extra-virgin varieties of olive oil). The double-blind, randomized study, headed by Francisco Perez-Jimenez from the University of Cordoba, involved 20 research subjects, all with metabolic syndrome. For six weeks, the patients did not take any supplements or drugs and they were all placed on similar low-fat, carbohydrate-rich diets. Then, for breakfast, they ate either a breakfast containing virgin olive oil with a high content of phenolic compounds or a similar breakfast with low phenol content.
The research team took blood samples after the meals to check for the expression of over 15,000 human genes. The results? The high phenol olive oil clearly impacted the regulation of almost 100 genes -- many of which have been linked to obesity, high blood fat levels, type 2 diabetes and heart disease.
"We identified 98 differentially expressed genes when comparing the intake of phenol-rich olive oil with low-phenol olive oil. Several of the repressed genes are known to be involved in pro-inflammatory processes, suggesting that the diet can switch the activity of immune system cells to a less deleterious inflammatory profile, as seen in metabolic syndrome," Dr. Perez-Jimenez said in a statement to the press. "These findings strengthen the relationship between inflammation, obesity and diet and provide evidence at the most basic level of healthy effects derived from virgin olive oil consumption in humans."
The ability of olive oil's phenolic compounds to reduce or prevent inflammation also provides a molecular basis for the reduction of heart disease observed in Mediterranean countries, where virgin olive oil represents a main source of dietary fat.
For more information:
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2...
http://www.naturalnews.com/olive_oi...
Economics in Freefall
Paul Craig Roberts Archive
July 14, 2010
Economics in Freefall
By Paul Craig Roberts
I admire Joseph E. Stiglitz, because he has a social conscience and a sense of justice, the absence of which turns economists into monsters. Despite his virtues and Nobel Prize, Stiglitz sometimes falls down as an economist. Readers of my new book, How The Economy Was Lost, will be aware that I take him to task for the Solow-Stiglitz production function, which seriously misleads economics about the scarcity of nature’s capital.
Another of Stiglitz’s shortcomings, one that he shares with most economists, is his habit of reifying the market economy. The market is a social organization. The results of market activity reflect the behavior of the human participants in the market. When economists reify the market, they attribute the behavior, ethics, and morality—or lack thereof—of humans to the market itself. Thus, Stiglitz describes human failures as "market failures," and he asks in his new book, Freefall, "why didn’t the market exercise discipline on bad corporate governance and bad incentive structures?"
Social institutions are inanimate. They do not possess life and cannot impose good outcomes on human action.
Libertarians also reify markets, but instead of blaming markets for human failures, they imbue the market with human virtues and even with the super-human virtue of producing results that human intelligence cannot improve upon. Economists’ "risk models" for which Nobel Prizes have been awarded and Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan attributed the social institution with economic wisdom beyond man’s.
It is likely that the practice of reifying the market economy developed as a form of shorthand. It was convenient to say that the market did this and that rather than to have to describe the human interactions that produced the results. The market was transformed from an abstraction into a life form and became the actor instead of the humans operating within the institution.
If the outcomes are good, libertarians attribute the good results to the market’s virtues; if bad, libertarians blame human interference—government regulation. Economists of Stiglitz’s persuasion see it in the opposite way. Good results are produced by regulation; bad results are the result of allowing the market to make decisions on its own.
This way of thinking, which reifies a social institution, is ingrained in economics. It is the source of enormous confusion and has resulted in a pointless long-running ideological battle that Stiglitz calls "a battle of ideas."
It is possible to clear away the confusion. First, understand that a free market is one in which prices are free to respond to supply and demand. Economists of all persuasions understand that to fix a price below the price at which supply and demand equate results in shortages. Economists have learned this from rent control. Fixing a price above the price at which supply and demand equate results in surpluses. Economists have learned this from agricultural subsidies. A free market does not mean a market in which human behavior is not regulated. A free market is one in which supply and demand are permitted to equate.
Second, understand that regulation regulates human behavior, not the market. It is the actors in the market who are charged with regulatory infractions, not the institution itself. Regulation is necessary because of human faults, such as greed, fraud, carelessness, not because of market faults. Regulation is necessary because of human failure, not because of market failure.
Third, understand that the problem of regulation is that it is done by flawed humans. Human flaws do not disappear by moving human action from the economy to government. Most likely the flaws worsen as government decisions are often unaccountable. Many economists assume that regulators act in the public interest. However, as George Stigler, another Nobel Prizewinner, pointed out several decades ago, regulators are invariably captured by the industries that they regulate.
There are endless examples of regulators—indeed, entire governments—captured by the private interests that they are supposed to regulate. For example, in a recent subscriber’s edition of CounterPunch (June 16-30), Jeffrey St. Clair describes in detail the incestuous relationship between the government’s Minerals Management Service and the oil industry. An agency charged with regulating the impact of oil drilling on the environment became "a bureaucratic facilitator of big oil." Thus, the environmental catastrophe in the Gulf of Mexico and looming catastrophes along Alaska’s fragile coastline.
Indeed, economists themselves and academics are often captured by private interest groups and turned into shills. In How The Economy Was Lost, I accuse economists of shilling for transnational corporations when they falsely describe jobs offshoring as the beneficial workings of free trade. Like the Israel Lobby, corporations have found that money will purchase professors, academic departments and think tanks, as well as journalists.
Offshoring transforms American workers’ wages into performance bonuses for executives, capital gains for shareholders, and honoraria and research grants for economists who shill for the practice.
The problem that the US economy faces is far more serious than the financial crisis resulting from financial deregulation. The reason that traditional monetary and fiscal policies cannot produce an economic recovery is that so much of the US economy has been moved offshore. As the jobs have departed, there is no work to which low interest rates and massive government spending can recall workers.
This is the real freefall.
Paul Craig Roberts [email him] was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury during President Reagan’s first term. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal. He has held numerous academic appointments, including the William E. Simon Chair, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Georgetown University, and Senior Research Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University. He was awarded the Legion of Honor by French President Francois Mitterrand. He is the author of Supply-Side Revolution : An Insider's Account of Policymaking in Washington; Alienation and the Soviet Economy
July 14, 2010
Economics in Freefall
By Paul Craig Roberts
I admire Joseph E. Stiglitz, because he has a social conscience and a sense of justice, the absence of which turns economists into monsters. Despite his virtues and Nobel Prize, Stiglitz sometimes falls down as an economist. Readers of my new book, How The Economy Was Lost, will be aware that I take him to task for the Solow-Stiglitz production function, which seriously misleads economics about the scarcity of nature’s capital.
Another of Stiglitz’s shortcomings, one that he shares with most economists, is his habit of reifying the market economy. The market is a social organization. The results of market activity reflect the behavior of the human participants in the market. When economists reify the market, they attribute the behavior, ethics, and morality—or lack thereof—of humans to the market itself. Thus, Stiglitz describes human failures as "market failures," and he asks in his new book, Freefall, "why didn’t the market exercise discipline on bad corporate governance and bad incentive structures?"
Social institutions are inanimate. They do not possess life and cannot impose good outcomes on human action.
Libertarians also reify markets, but instead of blaming markets for human failures, they imbue the market with human virtues and even with the super-human virtue of producing results that human intelligence cannot improve upon. Economists’ "risk models" for which Nobel Prizes have been awarded and Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan attributed the social institution with economic wisdom beyond man’s.
It is likely that the practice of reifying the market economy developed as a form of shorthand. It was convenient to say that the market did this and that rather than to have to describe the human interactions that produced the results. The market was transformed from an abstraction into a life form and became the actor instead of the humans operating within the institution.
If the outcomes are good, libertarians attribute the good results to the market’s virtues; if bad, libertarians blame human interference—government regulation. Economists of Stiglitz’s persuasion see it in the opposite way. Good results are produced by regulation; bad results are the result of allowing the market to make decisions on its own.
This way of thinking, which reifies a social institution, is ingrained in economics. It is the source of enormous confusion and has resulted in a pointless long-running ideological battle that Stiglitz calls "a battle of ideas."
It is possible to clear away the confusion. First, understand that a free market is one in which prices are free to respond to supply and demand. Economists of all persuasions understand that to fix a price below the price at which supply and demand equate results in shortages. Economists have learned this from rent control. Fixing a price above the price at which supply and demand equate results in surpluses. Economists have learned this from agricultural subsidies. A free market does not mean a market in which human behavior is not regulated. A free market is one in which supply and demand are permitted to equate.
Second, understand that regulation regulates human behavior, not the market. It is the actors in the market who are charged with regulatory infractions, not the institution itself. Regulation is necessary because of human faults, such as greed, fraud, carelessness, not because of market faults. Regulation is necessary because of human failure, not because of market failure.
Third, understand that the problem of regulation is that it is done by flawed humans. Human flaws do not disappear by moving human action from the economy to government. Most likely the flaws worsen as government decisions are often unaccountable. Many economists assume that regulators act in the public interest. However, as George Stigler, another Nobel Prizewinner, pointed out several decades ago, regulators are invariably captured by the industries that they regulate.
There are endless examples of regulators—indeed, entire governments—captured by the private interests that they are supposed to regulate. For example, in a recent subscriber’s edition of CounterPunch (June 16-30), Jeffrey St. Clair describes in detail the incestuous relationship between the government’s Minerals Management Service and the oil industry. An agency charged with regulating the impact of oil drilling on the environment became "a bureaucratic facilitator of big oil." Thus, the environmental catastrophe in the Gulf of Mexico and looming catastrophes along Alaska’s fragile coastline.
Indeed, economists themselves and academics are often captured by private interest groups and turned into shills. In How The Economy Was Lost, I accuse economists of shilling for transnational corporations when they falsely describe jobs offshoring as the beneficial workings of free trade. Like the Israel Lobby, corporations have found that money will purchase professors, academic departments and think tanks, as well as journalists.
Offshoring transforms American workers’ wages into performance bonuses for executives, capital gains for shareholders, and honoraria and research grants for economists who shill for the practice.
The problem that the US economy faces is far more serious than the financial crisis resulting from financial deregulation. The reason that traditional monetary and fiscal policies cannot produce an economic recovery is that so much of the US economy has been moved offshore. As the jobs have departed, there is no work to which low interest rates and massive government spending can recall workers.
This is the real freefall.
Paul Craig Roberts [email him] was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury during President Reagan’s first term. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal. He has held numerous academic appointments, including the William E. Simon Chair, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Georgetown University, and Senior Research Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University. He was awarded the Legion of Honor by French President Francois Mitterrand. He is the author of Supply-Side Revolution : An Insider's Account of Policymaking in Washington; Alienation and the Soviet Economy
Monday, July 26, 2010
H.R. 5741 Slave bill now in Committee
H.R. 5741 Slave bill now in Committee
Rob Dew
Infowars.com
July 26, 2010
Slavery has a new name: “Mandatory Service”, introduced July 15th 2010 by Charles Rangle.
Democrat Charles Rangel.
H.R. 5741 will give the president the authority “To require all persons in the United States between the ages of 18 and 42 to perform national service, either as a member of the uniformed services or in civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, to authorize the induction of persons in the uniformed services during wartime to meet end-strength requirements of the uniformed services, and for other purposes.”
Barely a year after introducing H.R. 1444, which was supposed to form a “Congressional Commission on Civic Service to study methods of improving and promoting volunteerism and national service, and for other purposes”, Congress has upped the ante. Anyone between 18 and 42 will be eligible for a two year commitment of civilian or military service. With more college graduates working for the fast food industry, a depression era unemployment rate and less people retiring; the government will have plenty of eligible able bodies to move into the slave ranks.
This echos the sentiment of President Obama who asked Congress in Febuary 2009 to send him a bipartisan bill in the spirit of national service. His Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel outlined a similar plan in his book The Plan.
But even Emanuel aims low looking at only 18 to 25 year olds for three months of compulsory service. Under this new legislation nearly all, able bodied Americans will be sentenced to two years of forced labor. The infrastructure is already in place for those unwilling to participate in mandatory service and now the army is looking to fill it’s ranks with Interment/Resettlement Specialists.
There are very few loopholes to opt of out national service, even CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTORS (SEC. 109) will be forced to choose the mandatory option of A. noncombatant service (as defined by the President) or B. national civilian service. It seems the congressional commission on civic service will no longer be needed thanks to the hard work of a suspected Congressional tax cheat from New York.
The slavery bill is currently in debate in the House Committee on Armed Services chaired by Rep Ike Skelton a democrat from Missouri. Those who oppose mandatory slavery should contact Rep. Skelton. Many bills die in committee and this bill should meet the same fate.
Rob Dew
Infowars.com
July 26, 2010
Slavery has a new name: “Mandatory Service”, introduced July 15th 2010 by Charles Rangle.
Democrat Charles Rangel.
H.R. 5741 will give the president the authority “To require all persons in the United States between the ages of 18 and 42 to perform national service, either as a member of the uniformed services or in civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, to authorize the induction of persons in the uniformed services during wartime to meet end-strength requirements of the uniformed services, and for other purposes.”
Barely a year after introducing H.R. 1444, which was supposed to form a “Congressional Commission on Civic Service to study methods of improving and promoting volunteerism and national service, and for other purposes”, Congress has upped the ante. Anyone between 18 and 42 will be eligible for a two year commitment of civilian or military service. With more college graduates working for the fast food industry, a depression era unemployment rate and less people retiring; the government will have plenty of eligible able bodies to move into the slave ranks.
This echos the sentiment of President Obama who asked Congress in Febuary 2009 to send him a bipartisan bill in the spirit of national service. His Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel outlined a similar plan in his book The Plan.
But even Emanuel aims low looking at only 18 to 25 year olds for three months of compulsory service. Under this new legislation nearly all, able bodied Americans will be sentenced to two years of forced labor. The infrastructure is already in place for those unwilling to participate in mandatory service and now the army is looking to fill it’s ranks with Interment/Resettlement Specialists.
There are very few loopholes to opt of out national service, even CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTORS (SEC. 109) will be forced to choose the mandatory option of A. noncombatant service (as defined by the President) or B. national civilian service. It seems the congressional commission on civic service will no longer be needed thanks to the hard work of a suspected Congressional tax cheat from New York.
The slavery bill is currently in debate in the House Committee on Armed Services chaired by Rep Ike Skelton a democrat from Missouri. Those who oppose mandatory slavery should contact Rep. Skelton. Many bills die in committee and this bill should meet the same fate.
NHS bosses have drawn up secret plans for sweeping cuts to services, with restrictions on the most basic treatments for the sick and injured.
Axe falls on NHS services
NHS bosses have drawn up secret plans for sweeping cuts to services, with restrictions on the most basic treatments for the sick and injured.
By Laura Donnelly, Health Correspondent
Published: 9:19PM BST 24 Jul 2010
Comments
The NHS faces extensive cuts Photo: ALAMY Some of the most common operations — including hip replacements and cataract surgery — will be rationed as part of attempts to save billions of pounds, despite government promises that front-line services would be protected.
Patients’ groups have described the measures as “astonishingly brutal”.
Related Articles
Where are all the health visitors and district nurses?
David Cameron: Tories are the party of the NHS
Tens of thousands of NHS jobs 'to be cut'
'I will take a knife to the ailing NHS'
NHS suffering devastating cuts, warns BMA
Eye surgery could delay hip operations An investigation by The Sunday Telegraph has uncovered widespread cuts planned across the NHS, many of which have already been agreed by senior health service officials. They include:
* Restrictions on some of the most basic and common operations, including hip and knee replacements, cataract surgery and orthodontic procedures.
* Plans to cut hundreds of thousands of pounds from budgets for the terminally ill, with dying cancer patients to be told to manage their own symptoms if their condition worsens at evenings or weekends.
* The closure of nursing homes for the elderly.
* A reduction in acute hospital beds, including those for the mentally ill, with targets to discourage GPs from sending patients to hospitals and reduce the number of people using accident and emergency departments.
* Tighter rationing of NHS funding for IVF treatment, and for surgery for obesity.
* Thousands of job losses at NHS hospitals, including 500 staff to go at a trust where cancer patients recently suffered delays in diagnosis and treatment because of staff shortages.
* Cost-cutting programmes in paediatric and maternity services, care of the elderly and services that provide respite breaks to long-term carers.
The Sunday Telegraph found the details of hundreds of cuts buried in obscure appendices to lengthy policy and strategy documents published by trusts. In most cases, local communities appear to be unaware of the plans.
Dr Peter Carter, the head of the Royal College of Nursing, said he was “incredibly worried” about the disclosures.
He urged Andrew Lansley, the Health Secretary, to “get a grip” on the reality of what was going on in the NHS.
The Government has promised to protect the overall budget of the NHS, which will continue to receive above-inflation increases, but said the service must make “efficiency savings” of up to £20 billion by 2014, which would be diverted back to the front line.
Mr Lansley said last month: “This protection for the NHS is protection for patients – to ensure that the sick do not pay for the debt crisis.”
Dr Carter said: “Andrew Lansley keeps saying that the Government will protect the front line from cuts – but the reality appears to be quite the opposite. We are seeing trusts making job cuts even when they have already admitted to being short staffed.
‘‘The statements he makes may be well intentioned – but we would implore him to get a grip on the reality, because these kinds of cuts are incredibly worrying.”
Katherine Murphy, of the Patients Association, said the cuts were “astonishingly brutal” and expressed particular concern at moves to ration operations such as hip and knee operations.
“These are not unusual procedures, this is a really blatant attempt to save money by leaving people in pain,” she said.
“Looking at these kinds of cuts, which trusts have drawn up in such secrecy, it particularly worries me how far they disadvantage the elderly and the vulnerable.
‘‘We cannot return to the days of people waiting in pain for years for a hip operation or having to pay for operations privately.”
She added that it was “incredibly cruel” to draw up savings plans based on denying care to the dying.
On Thursday, the board of Sutton and Merton primary care trust (PCT) in London agreed more than £50 million of savings in two years. The plan included more than £400,000 to be saved by “reducing length of stay” in hospital for the terminally ill.
As well as sending more patients home to die, the paper said the savings would be made by admitting fewer terminally ill cancer patients to hospital because they were struggling to cope with symptoms such as pain. Instead, more patients would be given advice on “self management” of their condition.
Bill Gillespie, the trust’s chief executive, said patients would stay at home, or be discharged from hospital only if that was their choice, and would be given support in their homes.
This week, Hertfordshire PCT plans to discuss attempts to reduce spending by rationing more than 50 common procedures, including hip and knee replacements, cataract surgery and orthodontic treatment.
Doctors across the county have already been told that their patients can have the operations only if they are given “prior approval” by the PCT, with each authorisation made on a “case by case” basis.
Elsewhere, new restrictions have been introduced to limit funding of IVF.
While many infertile couples living in Yorkshire had previously been allowed two cycles of treatment — still short of national guidance to fund three cycles — all the primary care trusts in the county are now restricting treatment to one cycle per couple.
A “turnaround” plan drawn up by Peterborough PCT intends to make almost £100 million of savings by 2013.
Its cuts include closing nursing and residential homes and services for the mentally ill, sending 500 fewer patients to hospital each month, and cutting £17 million from acute and accident and emergency services.
Two weeks ago, Mid Yorkshire Hospitals trust agreed plans to save £55 million in two years, with £20 million coming from about 500 job losses.
Yet, a month before the decision was taken, senior managers at a board meeting described how staff shortages were already causing delays for patients being diagnosed and treated for breast cancer.
Mr Lansley said any trusts that interpreted the Government’s demands for efficiency savings as budget or service cuts were wrong to do so, and were “living in the past”.
NHS bosses have drawn up secret plans for sweeping cuts to services, with restrictions on the most basic treatments for the sick and injured.
By Laura Donnelly, Health Correspondent
Published: 9:19PM BST 24 Jul 2010
Comments
The NHS faces extensive cuts Photo: ALAMY Some of the most common operations — including hip replacements and cataract surgery — will be rationed as part of attempts to save billions of pounds, despite government promises that front-line services would be protected.
Patients’ groups have described the measures as “astonishingly brutal”.
Related Articles
Where are all the health visitors and district nurses?
David Cameron: Tories are the party of the NHS
Tens of thousands of NHS jobs 'to be cut'
'I will take a knife to the ailing NHS'
NHS suffering devastating cuts, warns BMA
Eye surgery could delay hip operations An investigation by The Sunday Telegraph has uncovered widespread cuts planned across the NHS, many of which have already been agreed by senior health service officials. They include:
* Restrictions on some of the most basic and common operations, including hip and knee replacements, cataract surgery and orthodontic procedures.
* Plans to cut hundreds of thousands of pounds from budgets for the terminally ill, with dying cancer patients to be told to manage their own symptoms if their condition worsens at evenings or weekends.
* The closure of nursing homes for the elderly.
* A reduction in acute hospital beds, including those for the mentally ill, with targets to discourage GPs from sending patients to hospitals and reduce the number of people using accident and emergency departments.
* Tighter rationing of NHS funding for IVF treatment, and for surgery for obesity.
* Thousands of job losses at NHS hospitals, including 500 staff to go at a trust where cancer patients recently suffered delays in diagnosis and treatment because of staff shortages.
* Cost-cutting programmes in paediatric and maternity services, care of the elderly and services that provide respite breaks to long-term carers.
The Sunday Telegraph found the details of hundreds of cuts buried in obscure appendices to lengthy policy and strategy documents published by trusts. In most cases, local communities appear to be unaware of the plans.
Dr Peter Carter, the head of the Royal College of Nursing, said he was “incredibly worried” about the disclosures.
He urged Andrew Lansley, the Health Secretary, to “get a grip” on the reality of what was going on in the NHS.
The Government has promised to protect the overall budget of the NHS, which will continue to receive above-inflation increases, but said the service must make “efficiency savings” of up to £20 billion by 2014, which would be diverted back to the front line.
Mr Lansley said last month: “This protection for the NHS is protection for patients – to ensure that the sick do not pay for the debt crisis.”
Dr Carter said: “Andrew Lansley keeps saying that the Government will protect the front line from cuts – but the reality appears to be quite the opposite. We are seeing trusts making job cuts even when they have already admitted to being short staffed.
‘‘The statements he makes may be well intentioned – but we would implore him to get a grip on the reality, because these kinds of cuts are incredibly worrying.”
Katherine Murphy, of the Patients Association, said the cuts were “astonishingly brutal” and expressed particular concern at moves to ration operations such as hip and knee operations.
“These are not unusual procedures, this is a really blatant attempt to save money by leaving people in pain,” she said.
“Looking at these kinds of cuts, which trusts have drawn up in such secrecy, it particularly worries me how far they disadvantage the elderly and the vulnerable.
‘‘We cannot return to the days of people waiting in pain for years for a hip operation or having to pay for operations privately.”
She added that it was “incredibly cruel” to draw up savings plans based on denying care to the dying.
On Thursday, the board of Sutton and Merton primary care trust (PCT) in London agreed more than £50 million of savings in two years. The plan included more than £400,000 to be saved by “reducing length of stay” in hospital for the terminally ill.
As well as sending more patients home to die, the paper said the savings would be made by admitting fewer terminally ill cancer patients to hospital because they were struggling to cope with symptoms such as pain. Instead, more patients would be given advice on “self management” of their condition.
Bill Gillespie, the trust’s chief executive, said patients would stay at home, or be discharged from hospital only if that was their choice, and would be given support in their homes.
This week, Hertfordshire PCT plans to discuss attempts to reduce spending by rationing more than 50 common procedures, including hip and knee replacements, cataract surgery and orthodontic treatment.
Doctors across the county have already been told that their patients can have the operations only if they are given “prior approval” by the PCT, with each authorisation made on a “case by case” basis.
Elsewhere, new restrictions have been introduced to limit funding of IVF.
While many infertile couples living in Yorkshire had previously been allowed two cycles of treatment — still short of national guidance to fund three cycles — all the primary care trusts in the county are now restricting treatment to one cycle per couple.
A “turnaround” plan drawn up by Peterborough PCT intends to make almost £100 million of savings by 2013.
Its cuts include closing nursing and residential homes and services for the mentally ill, sending 500 fewer patients to hospital each month, and cutting £17 million from acute and accident and emergency services.
Two weeks ago, Mid Yorkshire Hospitals trust agreed plans to save £55 million in two years, with £20 million coming from about 500 job losses.
Yet, a month before the decision was taken, senior managers at a board meeting described how staff shortages were already causing delays for patients being diagnosed and treated for breast cancer.
Mr Lansley said any trusts that interpreted the Government’s demands for efficiency savings as budget or service cuts were wrong to do so, and were “living in the past”.
How Vaccines Dysregulate The Immune System
How Vaccines Dysregulate The Immune System and
Impact Genetic Control Over Disease Expression
5th Annual Joint American Homeopathic Conference Poster Session 2010
presented by Patricia Jordan, DVM, CVA, CTCVH, & Herbology www.dr-jordan.com
Classification of Immune Responses Body defense mechanisms Innate and adaptive immunity
Mucosal Immunity
Cell mediated responses (Th1) Lymphocytes, (CD1, CD 2, CD3, CD4, CD8) monocytes- macrophages and natural killer (NK) cells (principal components) Cytokines
Humoral responses (Th2) involve soluble components including immunoglobulins (antibodies) [Igs-IgG, IgM, IgA, IgE, IgD], class switching, antibody gamma globulins and complement proteins
Immune System Components Genetic Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) system Chromosome, gene, haplotype, and polymorphism and super gene family molecules.9 MHC genes and include [HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, HLA-DPA 1, HLADPB1, HLA-DQA1, HLA-DQB1, HLA-DRA and HLADRBI.] MHC region divided into three regions Class I (HLA-A, B and C) Class II (HLADP, DQ and DR) and Class III genes encode complement components (C2, C4 and Factor B), cytokines (TNF-α) MHC genes display high levels of allelic diversity
Activation of Adaptive Immunity Innate immunity may trigger adaptive immune responses thru Antigen processing and presentation by macrophages and dendritic cells .The evolution of the immune system is a direct consequence of pathogen-exerted selection pressure. It is particularly those qualities like progressive development of humoral and cellular adoptive immunity, Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC), variable class I and class II genes, precise mechanisms of immune recognition and long-term immune memory that reflect the fundamental evolutionary advancement of the vertebrate immune system. In evolution the survival advantage imposed by an extremely reactive immune system is jeopardized if that system turns against the host and causes "self" destruction. Vaccination is an abnormal pathogen presented in an abnormal route (injection) and influences the entire immune system in an unnatural way, leading to unnatural evolutionary selection where the results are dys regulation of the immune system, disruption of TH1 bias, atrophy of mucosal, increased inflammation, loss of specification and control. Vaccination dysregulates the immune system and genetically impacts the HLA (MHC) leading to an abnormal expression of disease susceptibility. The vaccine is no more a reflection of the actual environmental challenges faced by those vaccinated than the now dysregulated immune system is a reflection of intelligent design or natural selection. Vaccines are genotoxic; corrupted genomes are leading to the loss of the organic self. Vaccines are responsible for autoimmune, cancer, Type I-IV reactions, allergies, asthma, atopy anaphylaxis, eczema, organ failure, neurological, behavioral disease and death.[List is not complete] Vaccine disease is the root of our dys regulated immune system and the dys regulated immune response.
Anything that affects gene coding affects genetic expression of disease
The evolution of the immune system is a direct consequence of the pathogens the immune system was exposed to from the environment. The pathogens exert an evolutionary selection pressure which was in part responsible for the genotypes of the MHC (major histocompatibility complexes) that developed in tandem to handle the pathogens. The MHC determines the host's immunopathology impact from the antigen and is responsible for the expression of clinical disease. The immune system is very complex and developed to handle an enormous variety of pathogens, the genetic ability to respond to a large number of pathogens was necessary in order to survive to live another day.
The MHC tissue markers are one of the major routes of tapping into the possible needs for survival via the immune response. Although not the only way, besides the MHC we have the major loci, minor loci and many other locations for gene expression to effect disease expression. We now see the complexity of immune system response pathways and still there are many factors that remain unknown. The MHC and the HLA and DLA (yes, dogs also have MHC sites like the humans) in fact all vertebrates have this important link of genetic expression of antigen reception and engagement. The groups of receptor sites not only engage with the pathogens, they are also responsible for a cascade of events that have evolved over time to express the organism's impact with a pathogen, reflecting in dis ease susceptibility and genetic expression.
There is a great variability in how any one individual will react to any pathogen and it is the individual's genetic variability that is the marvel of individual and species survival .Not everyone would respond the same way to each pathogenic impact. The immune system, like a virus has great reach with incredible mutation ability through gene expression and this brings an organism forward to survive another day.
Vaccines lead to genetic mutations. Genetic impact on MHC (HLA) is what dictates genetic expression of disease susceptibility. Vaccines rob the individual of natural evolutionary selection pressures based on natural antigen risks. Vaccines are altering gene sequences, inserting genes, affecting genome and destroying the organic immunologically determined susceptibility that evolved with natural selection. Determined susceptibility is genetically impacted ahead of disease expression by the antigens presented to or encountered by the individual. The immune system has evolved naturally to promote life and what is happening with unnatural antigen environment delivered in unnatural route to dysregulate the immune system is resulting in unnatural selection, immune system corruption and species distortion.
The genetic basis for susceptibility to disease is complex but well before man understood anything about the immune system and how it worked, he intruded on the evolved design with a hubris that is having collateral damage and unintended consequences of species de evolution.
A little immunology review;
The innate immune system was developed to provide the organism with an immediate response. The natural immune system is composed of three portions; the first line of defense is the mucosal immunity and works with the cell mediated immune system (Th1) to deal with the great majority of pathogens. Entry sites to the body via the skin, mucosal sites of the nasal/respiratory, oral/rectal, ocular, aural and urogenital is where the majority of trials for the immune system would have started. The mucosal immunity has antiseptic patches of secretory immunoglobulins (IgA) to respond first. If the mucosal surfaces were actually penetrated than the IgE immunoglobulins came forth for the defense.
The cell mediated responders have evolved to provide the acute inflammation response which is necessary in properly maturing the body's immune system. Without the majority of pathogens entering from these sites, the immune system does not reach maturity and therefore is unable to respond competently. The childhood xanthamatic diseases fulfill this purpose of immune system maturation. Denied the ability to "mature" the immune system, the organism is left with a dysfunctional immune response and genetic disease expression is altered.
Acute inflammation in the mature immune system can process and effectively clear the intruder. The hypothesis on how this takes place is via the dendritic cells instructions to TH1 polarity. Of course if the dendritic cells are damaged from the vaccine or the aluminum or the mercury in the vaccines, this is one way the vaccines dysregulate the polarity of the immune response. The body needs to be able to focus on the correct form of response as the body deals with the pathogen. Later, after the invasion by pathogen has been cleared, the body then engages the humoral immunity (Th2) to recognize the pathogen and produces antibody against it .This form of the immune system is the acquired immune response and is the arm for which vaccinations were meant to augment. The humoral immunity makes the specific recognizing antibody after the body is over the acute inflammation so as not to exhaust the individual and prevent recovery.
Humoral immunity (Th2) unskewed system is a much different system designed to deal with pathogens or agents that might penetrate the skin bypassing the mucosal immunity ex; venoms from snakebites, poisons or toxins from bites, stings or deep punctures and microbial injection into areas of low oxygenation .The humoral system is capable of handling toxin inactivation and antigen opsonization, dealing with intracellular pathogens and direction of recognition via antibody production. The natural immune system never evolved to see immune challenges enter the body like this. Rarely would a pathogen come into the immune system's pristine internal environment of the blood. Humoral immunity was not designed to handle a myriad of pathogens this route, rather the humoral immunity is an internal deeper acting immune system for a lesser number of directly injected pathogens. Parental presentation of the pathogens via vaccination was not "good shepherding" practice and instead has been responsible for the improper wiring, signaling and biochemical pathway disruptions that make up many disorders today. Again, the wrench thrown into the dynamics of an evolutionarily successful system by manual manipulations not based on evolutionary pressure but by medical hubris. Although pleased with this intervention, man has remained incapable of understanding the chaos they have created.
The complex immune system with the spread of genetic variability has served us well through the beginning of time. Unfortunately, about 300 years ago an adulteration and violation of the natural workings of the immune system took place. This adulteration was the unnatural injection of unnatural pathogens that were not from the natural environment but rather a concoction of ingredients made artificially and mixed with toxic chemicals. Early on the recipe included embalming agents, later with heavy and light metals, and eventually with genetically engineered chimeras, man made monsters of unnatural origin. Many of the viruses being injected into the bodies are genetically engineered and certainly not organic. The vaccine has never been a natural pathogen of the natural environment and never a natural route of introduction and penetration of the host immune system. Why would we not foresee the dys regulation, dysfunction and the accompanied corresponding genetic compromises and hybridization that explain the growing number of health issues that have run parallel with the rise in vaccine number and use?
The many ways the vaccines dysregulate the immune system and de construct health. First imposition of the vaccine is to affect genetic expression of disease by affording the unnatural engagement of the MHC, the major HLA then minor loci; cytokine genes, CD-encoding genes, T cell receptor genes, growth hormone and immunoglobulin genes any of the polygenes that cascade down to the intricacies of our many possible gene responses.
Second imposition of the vaccine is to skew the immune system and remove the balance of Th1 and Th2 between cell mediated immunity and humoral immunity. Total dysregulation, shifting of the poles of immunity which will include a combination of mutations, gene expression, biochemical pathway alterations, enzyme disruptions, hijacking the system dys regulation by up regulation of the IgE expression and a down regulation of the IgA, disruption of the cytokine profile and many, many other routes depending on the nature of the pathogen and toxins in the vaccine and the variable gene response of the individual.
Expression of disease now, is a function of the unnatural exposure to unnatural pathogens and toxins and the expression of disease as varied as behavioral, Type I-IV Hypersensitivity; allergies, asthma, anaphylaxis, atopy, eczema, cancer, autoimmune, bacterial, viral, yeast, fungal, internal and external parasites and genetic diseases. The genetic expression of disease is predated by the link up of the pathogen and the individual's gene which are pathogen impact impressionable. The unnatural selection pressure on the species by the use of vaccines is unnaturally evolving or de evolving the species through genotoxicity and genetic disease increase. The genetic damage or "genetic susceptibility" is transferable to the next generation. The next generation when vaccinated, expresses easily the adverse events that vaccines are selecting for.
The type of immune response that occurs after pathogen binding is determined by cytokine messengers that are triggered by certain elements of the pathogen. The vaccine contains a multiple number of ways to affect this: contamination with unknown viruses and microbial components, unnatural pathogens, chimeras and other genetically engineered products, unfiltered genetic pieces like virions, prions, viruses from other species, aluminum, mercury which can directly lead to abnormal cytokine messengers being produced via pathogen alterations/adulterations/mutations. Modified live viruses or "attenuated viruses" allow live cells to migrate to and replicate onto the host's tissues. Another act of hubris has occurred because playing with viruses all of these last 300 years, it was only recently that science has now discovered that viruses are not dead, they are not live, they are packets of genetic material that when in the presence of a susceptible and permissive living cell that has the necessary receptor can replicate and infect .We have to remember, the virus affects the appearance of antigen recognition sites in our MHC system which evolved as a type of ANTIVIRUS SOFTWEAR SYSTEM.
Sometimes, virus contamination in a vaccine can activate viruses in the human body 30-40 years after inoculation. The presence of unknown viruses, the contamination of viruses, the recombination and reassortment of viral genes and the introduction of xenotropic viruses, infective DNA viruses have all again - due to the hubris of man - introduced disease and pathology into organisms receiving the jab. The process of injecting unnatural substances into the body started well before the identification of the fist virus! The contamination continues today with the filtering process not finding virions and prions and other smaller genetic impacting contaminants. [Rotavirus vaccine for children found to contain pig virus]. The viral and even microbial antigens are all players in the genetic expression of disease and disease susceptibility to every genome via the MHC and other still unidentified pathways.
Adjuvants additionally adulterate the intelligence of the innate immune response. Adjuvants "add" inflammation and pathogen distortion and therefore cell signaling adulterations, impingement upon the evolutionarily perfected system and result in a loss of order. In 1988, Dr. Ron Schultz spoke out in a roundtable discussion over his concerns of the random addition to anything into vaccines without understanding in the least the impact that the addition of for example interleukins into the vaccines. He framed the impact of the whole body or even just the immune system as a complete unknown yet the cavalier attitude from vaccine makers was that no caution was necessary.
We know now that including interleukin in the vaccines in the 1980's has now produced children born to vaccinated populations with the genetic disease of missing interleukins! The "new" auto inflammatory syndrome DIRA deficiency of interleukin 1 receptor agonist where children display a constellation of serious and potentially fatal systemic symptoms from birth are inherited mutations in IL IRN - a gene that encodes a protein known as interleukin 1 receptor antagonist. The irony that Dr. Ian Tizzard would compare the ability to add ingredients like alum to vaccines used since 1926 and still in l988 not having any idea how it worked, is little comfort to the many parents of children suffering the highest rate of cancer, brain cancer. In 1999 theWHO through the IARC listed the aluminum in vaccines as a grade 3 out of 4 carcinogens. It doesn't help either to understand now that aluminum will increase the permeability of the blood brain barrier and allow viruses (viruses that have an affinity for the central nervous system like measles) into the brain along with the mercury and aluminum - both metals that can act synergistically to mutate. Seriously, they still don't see where the rise in childhood brain cancer is coming from?
Aluminum in the vaccines is also up regulating the IgE and compromising the IgA, therefore the presence of aluminum in the vaccines is a much involved gene impactor which causes vaccines to result in allergies, atopy, anaphylaxis, asthma and eczema expression. The natural immune system has a variety of defense tools to use in the protection of the organism however these systems are dys regulated when damaged pathways result from damaged pathogens or genetically engineered pathogens are artificially introduced.
The effects of alum were never known even though the toxin has enjoyed a hierarchical rise in use and success. The amount used in vaccines is not a "safe" amount, it is only the amount they found necessary to exert its inflammatory effect as an adjuvant! The lack of safety studies, lack of teratogenicity or carcinogenic studies or any long term effects signaling genetic defects from vaccines were never done. For any agency from the HHS, CDC, FDA, USDA,WHO, UN, UNICEF, and GAVI to endorse or project vaccines as safe is criminal and investigations should be called for.
Liability waivers put in force for the drug companies to escape prosecutorial litigation will not be upheld in the face of gross criminal action for failure to perform due diligence in the safety study or even of the efficacy studies that are lacking for vaccine use in the first place. The question as to what exactly was known as FDA-licensed products are unleashed upon the public gives rise to another question: why is it that the drug companies that makes vaccines and promotes their use, are the same drug companies that make the drug for the VACCINE DISEASE that follows the vaccine use? What exactly are the revelations that are bound behind "proprietary confidentiality clauses" and is this the way drug companies are pleading the Fifth Amendment for protection from self incrimination? Would this be the reason the governments remove vaccine liability from the manufacturers of the experimental guise under which health care is purported?
The highly polymorphic HLA/DLA antigen systems which are involved in antigen presentation clearly affects responses to vaccination and therefore this impact is unknown in any organism receiving the jab. This lack of knowing makes every vaccination: "experimentation under the guise of health care delivery." Effects of vaccines on any individual are variable and therefore any expected result incalculable, the risk to any organism is therefore unknown.
Administering a jab is not synonymous with conveying immunity. Antibody production is not equated to immunity and vaccination does not mean immunization. Damage from vaccines are cumulative, cell mediated immune suppression increases significantly with every jab. Multivalent vaccines are particularly damaging and immune disrupting.
Only vaccinated individuals were found to develop auto antibodies in a landmark study done at Perdue University. Auto antibodies are made with the vaccines from the viruses, from the microbial antigens, from the aluminum and mercury and other ingredients that would mutate or disrupt the pathogen. The increase of molecular mimicry increases with vaccines and these examples of pathways to increase the number of auto antibodies formed the trigger necessary to promote genetic expression of autoimmune disease. Certainly, autoimmune disease expression is one step closer to genetic disease and that handicap will transfer vertically to the next generation in many instances. The important understanding is that the adulteration of the genome came in via the injection of vaccine.
Since not even a very heavy book could contain all the pathways to disease expression from genetic effects of the vaccine (the great immune adulterant), let us at least end this with the following understanding; vaccines have no environmental epidemiological studies to support the benefits over risks of vaccine administration, they are not safe nor innocuous and have not even been proven effective in conveying immunity which is the only reason one would consider their use in the first place. Vaccination use fits the definition of "a medical assumption" and according to Dr. Stephen Blake is certainly the biggest medical assumption ever made in the history of mankind and is directly responsible for more disease, death and disability than any other medical procedure or act.
Not surprisingly, with the safety of vaccination questioned and autism, autoimmune diseases and cancer linked in hospitals to vaccinations, only now is the NIH announcing research grants for the purpose of addressing vaccine safety. The Research to Advance Vaccine Safety (R21) is just now in 2010 being initiated to research vaccines:
"research that will contribute to the overall understanding of vaccine safety such as physiological and immunological responses to vaccines and vaccine components, how genetic variations affect immune/physiological responses that may impact vaccine safety and identification of risk factors and biological markers that may be used to access whether there is a relationship between certain diseases or disorders and licensed vaccines and the application of genomic/molecular technologies to improve knowledge of vaccine safety"
The problem is that this "scientific study is too late". For three centuries genotoxicity, immune dysregulation and immune dysfunctioning - even to immune deficiency and annihilation - has been de evolving the genomes of man and animals.
Dr. Harris Coulter would consider the vaccination as medical hubris and the many diseases spawned from its use the "unintended consequences and collateral damage". The National Childhood Vaccination Program is a program in which any parent should have the right to protect their child. The mandatory vaccine programs are genetic assaults and project a form of invalid federal medicine which is tyranny. The promotion of the vaccine programs are fraudulent and criminal acts which no taxpayer should be made to support as the effect in many cases, cases rising with the rise in vaccine use, are genetic and constitute genotoxicity.
This attempt to violate the natural laws of evolution is impacting the species in a de-evolutionary format leading to increased genetic expression of disease and forcing those jabbed into a cycle of chronic disease management if not death first. Of course the same drug companies that make vaccines are usually the same ones that sell the medications to palliate and suppress said disease expression. This system of making disease and then making the medications to suppress and palliate the disease puts into the hands of the drug companies all the federal funds that sponsored the vaccines and then the money from the manipulated health care system treating the disease. Soon the allocation of funds for the drug companies will shift the power from the democratic state to the hands of the drug companies that have full impunity from liability, this benefit legislated for them by the members of the democratic legislature elected to represent those being vaccinated into disease and harmed in the first place!
Dr. Harris Coulter stated that" medicine" had a lot more to do with "politics" than it did with "science". Dr. Patricia Jordan noted that it took a Doctor of Political Science to point out to the medical profession what they did not seem capable of recognizing right in front of their face, that medicine is politics and politics is about money, no science necessary.
Any NIH research done under the Research to Advance Vaccine Safety (R21) must have independent, nonconflict oversight with participation of those harmed by vaccines to ensure that the real measure of vaccine damage is properly addressed. That is, unless the disease, disability and deaths from vaccines were to be immediately stopped in accordance with the Precautionary Principle.
The precautionary principle is a moral and political principle which states that if an action or policy might cause severe or irreversible harm to the public or to the environment, in the absence of a scientific consensus that harm would not ensue, the burden of proof falls on those who would advocate taking the action. The principle aims to provide guidance for protecting public health and the environment in the face of uncertain risks, stating that the absence of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason to postpone measures where there is a risk of serious or irreversible harm to public health or the environment.
It is obvious that the unnatural vaccine has unnaturally selected for genes that do not reflect a natural exposure from the real environment and thusly resulted in unnatural selection of genes that have dys regulated the immune system and disrupted the inflammatory pathway and distorted the populations genetically. Unnatural gene selection is then leading to resistance and susceptibility to disease which is unnatural and not the real picture of the antigen state within our external environment for which an immune system is geared to provide survivability against encounter. Vaccination is resulting in abnormal disease expression and the making of disease previously not encountered. Although it is popular to blame our external environment, this is not the main environment our immune system is being pressured by. In the madness, the species are being distorted and genomes are being corrupted. The rise of genetic susceptibility and genetic disease is a reflection of this distortion. Most of what we see today is Vaccine Disease, in that the dysregulation of the immune system by vaccines have altered the genetic susceptibility and expression of disease and is not evolving a better immune system and health but deconstructing the immune system and the genome towards doom.
http://www.thedogplace.org/Vaccines/Genetic-Impact-10071-Jordan.asp
More Articles by Patricia Jordan, DVM
Impact Genetic Control Over Disease Expression
5th Annual Joint American Homeopathic Conference Poster Session 2010
presented by Patricia Jordan, DVM, CVA, CTCVH, & Herbology www.dr-jordan.com
Classification of Immune Responses Body defense mechanisms Innate and adaptive immunity
Mucosal Immunity
Cell mediated responses (Th1) Lymphocytes, (CD1, CD 2, CD3, CD4, CD8) monocytes- macrophages and natural killer (NK) cells (principal components) Cytokines
Humoral responses (Th2) involve soluble components including immunoglobulins (antibodies) [Igs-IgG, IgM, IgA, IgE, IgD], class switching, antibody gamma globulins and complement proteins
Immune System Components Genetic Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) system Chromosome, gene, haplotype, and polymorphism and super gene family molecules.9 MHC genes and include [HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, HLA-DPA 1, HLADPB1, HLA-DQA1, HLA-DQB1, HLA-DRA and HLADRBI.] MHC region divided into three regions Class I (HLA-A, B and C) Class II (HLADP, DQ and DR) and Class III genes encode complement components (C2, C4 and Factor B), cytokines (TNF-α) MHC genes display high levels of allelic diversity
Activation of Adaptive Immunity Innate immunity may trigger adaptive immune responses thru Antigen processing and presentation by macrophages and dendritic cells .The evolution of the immune system is a direct consequence of pathogen-exerted selection pressure. It is particularly those qualities like progressive development of humoral and cellular adoptive immunity, Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC), variable class I and class II genes, precise mechanisms of immune recognition and long-term immune memory that reflect the fundamental evolutionary advancement of the vertebrate immune system. In evolution the survival advantage imposed by an extremely reactive immune system is jeopardized if that system turns against the host and causes "self" destruction. Vaccination is an abnormal pathogen presented in an abnormal route (injection) and influences the entire immune system in an unnatural way, leading to unnatural evolutionary selection where the results are dys regulation of the immune system, disruption of TH1 bias, atrophy of mucosal, increased inflammation, loss of specification and control. Vaccination dysregulates the immune system and genetically impacts the HLA (MHC) leading to an abnormal expression of disease susceptibility. The vaccine is no more a reflection of the actual environmental challenges faced by those vaccinated than the now dysregulated immune system is a reflection of intelligent design or natural selection. Vaccines are genotoxic; corrupted genomes are leading to the loss of the organic self. Vaccines are responsible for autoimmune, cancer, Type I-IV reactions, allergies, asthma, atopy anaphylaxis, eczema, organ failure, neurological, behavioral disease and death.[List is not complete] Vaccine disease is the root of our dys regulated immune system and the dys regulated immune response.
Anything that affects gene coding affects genetic expression of disease
The evolution of the immune system is a direct consequence of the pathogens the immune system was exposed to from the environment. The pathogens exert an evolutionary selection pressure which was in part responsible for the genotypes of the MHC (major histocompatibility complexes) that developed in tandem to handle the pathogens. The MHC determines the host's immunopathology impact from the antigen and is responsible for the expression of clinical disease. The immune system is very complex and developed to handle an enormous variety of pathogens, the genetic ability to respond to a large number of pathogens was necessary in order to survive to live another day.
The MHC tissue markers are one of the major routes of tapping into the possible needs for survival via the immune response. Although not the only way, besides the MHC we have the major loci, minor loci and many other locations for gene expression to effect disease expression. We now see the complexity of immune system response pathways and still there are many factors that remain unknown. The MHC and the HLA and DLA (yes, dogs also have MHC sites like the humans) in fact all vertebrates have this important link of genetic expression of antigen reception and engagement. The groups of receptor sites not only engage with the pathogens, they are also responsible for a cascade of events that have evolved over time to express the organism's impact with a pathogen, reflecting in dis ease susceptibility and genetic expression.
There is a great variability in how any one individual will react to any pathogen and it is the individual's genetic variability that is the marvel of individual and species survival .Not everyone would respond the same way to each pathogenic impact. The immune system, like a virus has great reach with incredible mutation ability through gene expression and this brings an organism forward to survive another day.
Vaccines lead to genetic mutations. Genetic impact on MHC (HLA) is what dictates genetic expression of disease susceptibility. Vaccines rob the individual of natural evolutionary selection pressures based on natural antigen risks. Vaccines are altering gene sequences, inserting genes, affecting genome and destroying the organic immunologically determined susceptibility that evolved with natural selection. Determined susceptibility is genetically impacted ahead of disease expression by the antigens presented to or encountered by the individual. The immune system has evolved naturally to promote life and what is happening with unnatural antigen environment delivered in unnatural route to dysregulate the immune system is resulting in unnatural selection, immune system corruption and species distortion.
The genetic basis for susceptibility to disease is complex but well before man understood anything about the immune system and how it worked, he intruded on the evolved design with a hubris that is having collateral damage and unintended consequences of species de evolution.
A little immunology review;
The innate immune system was developed to provide the organism with an immediate response. The natural immune system is composed of three portions; the first line of defense is the mucosal immunity and works with the cell mediated immune system (Th1) to deal with the great majority of pathogens. Entry sites to the body via the skin, mucosal sites of the nasal/respiratory, oral/rectal, ocular, aural and urogenital is where the majority of trials for the immune system would have started. The mucosal immunity has antiseptic patches of secretory immunoglobulins (IgA) to respond first. If the mucosal surfaces were actually penetrated than the IgE immunoglobulins came forth for the defense.
The cell mediated responders have evolved to provide the acute inflammation response which is necessary in properly maturing the body's immune system. Without the majority of pathogens entering from these sites, the immune system does not reach maturity and therefore is unable to respond competently. The childhood xanthamatic diseases fulfill this purpose of immune system maturation. Denied the ability to "mature" the immune system, the organism is left with a dysfunctional immune response and genetic disease expression is altered.
Acute inflammation in the mature immune system can process and effectively clear the intruder. The hypothesis on how this takes place is via the dendritic cells instructions to TH1 polarity. Of course if the dendritic cells are damaged from the vaccine or the aluminum or the mercury in the vaccines, this is one way the vaccines dysregulate the polarity of the immune response. The body needs to be able to focus on the correct form of response as the body deals with the pathogen. Later, after the invasion by pathogen has been cleared, the body then engages the humoral immunity (Th2) to recognize the pathogen and produces antibody against it .This form of the immune system is the acquired immune response and is the arm for which vaccinations were meant to augment. The humoral immunity makes the specific recognizing antibody after the body is over the acute inflammation so as not to exhaust the individual and prevent recovery.
Humoral immunity (Th2) unskewed system is a much different system designed to deal with pathogens or agents that might penetrate the skin bypassing the mucosal immunity ex; venoms from snakebites, poisons or toxins from bites, stings or deep punctures and microbial injection into areas of low oxygenation .The humoral system is capable of handling toxin inactivation and antigen opsonization, dealing with intracellular pathogens and direction of recognition via antibody production. The natural immune system never evolved to see immune challenges enter the body like this. Rarely would a pathogen come into the immune system's pristine internal environment of the blood. Humoral immunity was not designed to handle a myriad of pathogens this route, rather the humoral immunity is an internal deeper acting immune system for a lesser number of directly injected pathogens. Parental presentation of the pathogens via vaccination was not "good shepherding" practice and instead has been responsible for the improper wiring, signaling and biochemical pathway disruptions that make up many disorders today. Again, the wrench thrown into the dynamics of an evolutionarily successful system by manual manipulations not based on evolutionary pressure but by medical hubris. Although pleased with this intervention, man has remained incapable of understanding the chaos they have created.
The complex immune system with the spread of genetic variability has served us well through the beginning of time. Unfortunately, about 300 years ago an adulteration and violation of the natural workings of the immune system took place. This adulteration was the unnatural injection of unnatural pathogens that were not from the natural environment but rather a concoction of ingredients made artificially and mixed with toxic chemicals. Early on the recipe included embalming agents, later with heavy and light metals, and eventually with genetically engineered chimeras, man made monsters of unnatural origin. Many of the viruses being injected into the bodies are genetically engineered and certainly not organic. The vaccine has never been a natural pathogen of the natural environment and never a natural route of introduction and penetration of the host immune system. Why would we not foresee the dys regulation, dysfunction and the accompanied corresponding genetic compromises and hybridization that explain the growing number of health issues that have run parallel with the rise in vaccine number and use?
The many ways the vaccines dysregulate the immune system and de construct health. First imposition of the vaccine is to affect genetic expression of disease by affording the unnatural engagement of the MHC, the major HLA then minor loci; cytokine genes, CD-encoding genes, T cell receptor genes, growth hormone and immunoglobulin genes any of the polygenes that cascade down to the intricacies of our many possible gene responses.
Second imposition of the vaccine is to skew the immune system and remove the balance of Th1 and Th2 between cell mediated immunity and humoral immunity. Total dysregulation, shifting of the poles of immunity which will include a combination of mutations, gene expression, biochemical pathway alterations, enzyme disruptions, hijacking the system dys regulation by up regulation of the IgE expression and a down regulation of the IgA, disruption of the cytokine profile and many, many other routes depending on the nature of the pathogen and toxins in the vaccine and the variable gene response of the individual.
Expression of disease now, is a function of the unnatural exposure to unnatural pathogens and toxins and the expression of disease as varied as behavioral, Type I-IV Hypersensitivity; allergies, asthma, anaphylaxis, atopy, eczema, cancer, autoimmune, bacterial, viral, yeast, fungal, internal and external parasites and genetic diseases. The genetic expression of disease is predated by the link up of the pathogen and the individual's gene which are pathogen impact impressionable. The unnatural selection pressure on the species by the use of vaccines is unnaturally evolving or de evolving the species through genotoxicity and genetic disease increase. The genetic damage or "genetic susceptibility" is transferable to the next generation. The next generation when vaccinated, expresses easily the adverse events that vaccines are selecting for.
The type of immune response that occurs after pathogen binding is determined by cytokine messengers that are triggered by certain elements of the pathogen. The vaccine contains a multiple number of ways to affect this: contamination with unknown viruses and microbial components, unnatural pathogens, chimeras and other genetically engineered products, unfiltered genetic pieces like virions, prions, viruses from other species, aluminum, mercury which can directly lead to abnormal cytokine messengers being produced via pathogen alterations/adulterations/mutations. Modified live viruses or "attenuated viruses" allow live cells to migrate to and replicate onto the host's tissues. Another act of hubris has occurred because playing with viruses all of these last 300 years, it was only recently that science has now discovered that viruses are not dead, they are not live, they are packets of genetic material that when in the presence of a susceptible and permissive living cell that has the necessary receptor can replicate and infect .We have to remember, the virus affects the appearance of antigen recognition sites in our MHC system which evolved as a type of ANTIVIRUS SOFTWEAR SYSTEM.
Sometimes, virus contamination in a vaccine can activate viruses in the human body 30-40 years after inoculation. The presence of unknown viruses, the contamination of viruses, the recombination and reassortment of viral genes and the introduction of xenotropic viruses, infective DNA viruses have all again - due to the hubris of man - introduced disease and pathology into organisms receiving the jab. The process of injecting unnatural substances into the body started well before the identification of the fist virus! The contamination continues today with the filtering process not finding virions and prions and other smaller genetic impacting contaminants. [Rotavirus vaccine for children found to contain pig virus]. The viral and even microbial antigens are all players in the genetic expression of disease and disease susceptibility to every genome via the MHC and other still unidentified pathways.
Adjuvants additionally adulterate the intelligence of the innate immune response. Adjuvants "add" inflammation and pathogen distortion and therefore cell signaling adulterations, impingement upon the evolutionarily perfected system and result in a loss of order. In 1988, Dr. Ron Schultz spoke out in a roundtable discussion over his concerns of the random addition to anything into vaccines without understanding in the least the impact that the addition of for example interleukins into the vaccines. He framed the impact of the whole body or even just the immune system as a complete unknown yet the cavalier attitude from vaccine makers was that no caution was necessary.
We know now that including interleukin in the vaccines in the 1980's has now produced children born to vaccinated populations with the genetic disease of missing interleukins! The "new" auto inflammatory syndrome DIRA deficiency of interleukin 1 receptor agonist where children display a constellation of serious and potentially fatal systemic symptoms from birth are inherited mutations in IL IRN - a gene that encodes a protein known as interleukin 1 receptor antagonist. The irony that Dr. Ian Tizzard would compare the ability to add ingredients like alum to vaccines used since 1926 and still in l988 not having any idea how it worked, is little comfort to the many parents of children suffering the highest rate of cancer, brain cancer. In 1999 theWHO through the IARC listed the aluminum in vaccines as a grade 3 out of 4 carcinogens. It doesn't help either to understand now that aluminum will increase the permeability of the blood brain barrier and allow viruses (viruses that have an affinity for the central nervous system like measles) into the brain along with the mercury and aluminum - both metals that can act synergistically to mutate. Seriously, they still don't see where the rise in childhood brain cancer is coming from?
Aluminum in the vaccines is also up regulating the IgE and compromising the IgA, therefore the presence of aluminum in the vaccines is a much involved gene impactor which causes vaccines to result in allergies, atopy, anaphylaxis, asthma and eczema expression. The natural immune system has a variety of defense tools to use in the protection of the organism however these systems are dys regulated when damaged pathways result from damaged pathogens or genetically engineered pathogens are artificially introduced.
The effects of alum were never known even though the toxin has enjoyed a hierarchical rise in use and success. The amount used in vaccines is not a "safe" amount, it is only the amount they found necessary to exert its inflammatory effect as an adjuvant! The lack of safety studies, lack of teratogenicity or carcinogenic studies or any long term effects signaling genetic defects from vaccines were never done. For any agency from the HHS, CDC, FDA, USDA,WHO, UN, UNICEF, and GAVI to endorse or project vaccines as safe is criminal and investigations should be called for.
Liability waivers put in force for the drug companies to escape prosecutorial litigation will not be upheld in the face of gross criminal action for failure to perform due diligence in the safety study or even of the efficacy studies that are lacking for vaccine use in the first place. The question as to what exactly was known as FDA-licensed products are unleashed upon the public gives rise to another question: why is it that the drug companies that makes vaccines and promotes their use, are the same drug companies that make the drug for the VACCINE DISEASE that follows the vaccine use? What exactly are the revelations that are bound behind "proprietary confidentiality clauses" and is this the way drug companies are pleading the Fifth Amendment for protection from self incrimination? Would this be the reason the governments remove vaccine liability from the manufacturers of the experimental guise under which health care is purported?
The highly polymorphic HLA/DLA antigen systems which are involved in antigen presentation clearly affects responses to vaccination and therefore this impact is unknown in any organism receiving the jab. This lack of knowing makes every vaccination: "experimentation under the guise of health care delivery." Effects of vaccines on any individual are variable and therefore any expected result incalculable, the risk to any organism is therefore unknown.
Administering a jab is not synonymous with conveying immunity. Antibody production is not equated to immunity and vaccination does not mean immunization. Damage from vaccines are cumulative, cell mediated immune suppression increases significantly with every jab. Multivalent vaccines are particularly damaging and immune disrupting.
Only vaccinated individuals were found to develop auto antibodies in a landmark study done at Perdue University. Auto antibodies are made with the vaccines from the viruses, from the microbial antigens, from the aluminum and mercury and other ingredients that would mutate or disrupt the pathogen. The increase of molecular mimicry increases with vaccines and these examples of pathways to increase the number of auto antibodies formed the trigger necessary to promote genetic expression of autoimmune disease. Certainly, autoimmune disease expression is one step closer to genetic disease and that handicap will transfer vertically to the next generation in many instances. The important understanding is that the adulteration of the genome came in via the injection of vaccine.
Since not even a very heavy book could contain all the pathways to disease expression from genetic effects of the vaccine (the great immune adulterant), let us at least end this with the following understanding; vaccines have no environmental epidemiological studies to support the benefits over risks of vaccine administration, they are not safe nor innocuous and have not even been proven effective in conveying immunity which is the only reason one would consider their use in the first place. Vaccination use fits the definition of "a medical assumption" and according to Dr. Stephen Blake is certainly the biggest medical assumption ever made in the history of mankind and is directly responsible for more disease, death and disability than any other medical procedure or act.
Not surprisingly, with the safety of vaccination questioned and autism, autoimmune diseases and cancer linked in hospitals to vaccinations, only now is the NIH announcing research grants for the purpose of addressing vaccine safety. The Research to Advance Vaccine Safety (R21) is just now in 2010 being initiated to research vaccines:
"research that will contribute to the overall understanding of vaccine safety such as physiological and immunological responses to vaccines and vaccine components, how genetic variations affect immune/physiological responses that may impact vaccine safety and identification of risk factors and biological markers that may be used to access whether there is a relationship between certain diseases or disorders and licensed vaccines and the application of genomic/molecular technologies to improve knowledge of vaccine safety"
The problem is that this "scientific study is too late". For three centuries genotoxicity, immune dysregulation and immune dysfunctioning - even to immune deficiency and annihilation - has been de evolving the genomes of man and animals.
Dr. Harris Coulter would consider the vaccination as medical hubris and the many diseases spawned from its use the "unintended consequences and collateral damage". The National Childhood Vaccination Program is a program in which any parent should have the right to protect their child. The mandatory vaccine programs are genetic assaults and project a form of invalid federal medicine which is tyranny. The promotion of the vaccine programs are fraudulent and criminal acts which no taxpayer should be made to support as the effect in many cases, cases rising with the rise in vaccine use, are genetic and constitute genotoxicity.
This attempt to violate the natural laws of evolution is impacting the species in a de-evolutionary format leading to increased genetic expression of disease and forcing those jabbed into a cycle of chronic disease management if not death first. Of course the same drug companies that make vaccines are usually the same ones that sell the medications to palliate and suppress said disease expression. This system of making disease and then making the medications to suppress and palliate the disease puts into the hands of the drug companies all the federal funds that sponsored the vaccines and then the money from the manipulated health care system treating the disease. Soon the allocation of funds for the drug companies will shift the power from the democratic state to the hands of the drug companies that have full impunity from liability, this benefit legislated for them by the members of the democratic legislature elected to represent those being vaccinated into disease and harmed in the first place!
Dr. Harris Coulter stated that" medicine" had a lot more to do with "politics" than it did with "science". Dr. Patricia Jordan noted that it took a Doctor of Political Science to point out to the medical profession what they did not seem capable of recognizing right in front of their face, that medicine is politics and politics is about money, no science necessary.
Any NIH research done under the Research to Advance Vaccine Safety (R21) must have independent, nonconflict oversight with participation of those harmed by vaccines to ensure that the real measure of vaccine damage is properly addressed. That is, unless the disease, disability and deaths from vaccines were to be immediately stopped in accordance with the Precautionary Principle.
The precautionary principle is a moral and political principle which states that if an action or policy might cause severe or irreversible harm to the public or to the environment, in the absence of a scientific consensus that harm would not ensue, the burden of proof falls on those who would advocate taking the action. The principle aims to provide guidance for protecting public health and the environment in the face of uncertain risks, stating that the absence of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason to postpone measures where there is a risk of serious or irreversible harm to public health or the environment.
It is obvious that the unnatural vaccine has unnaturally selected for genes that do not reflect a natural exposure from the real environment and thusly resulted in unnatural selection of genes that have dys regulated the immune system and disrupted the inflammatory pathway and distorted the populations genetically. Unnatural gene selection is then leading to resistance and susceptibility to disease which is unnatural and not the real picture of the antigen state within our external environment for which an immune system is geared to provide survivability against encounter. Vaccination is resulting in abnormal disease expression and the making of disease previously not encountered. Although it is popular to blame our external environment, this is not the main environment our immune system is being pressured by. In the madness, the species are being distorted and genomes are being corrupted. The rise of genetic susceptibility and genetic disease is a reflection of this distortion. Most of what we see today is Vaccine Disease, in that the dysregulation of the immune system by vaccines have altered the genetic susceptibility and expression of disease and is not evolving a better immune system and health but deconstructing the immune system and the genome towards doom.
http://www.thedogplace.org/Vaccines/Genetic-Impact-10071-Jordan.asp
More Articles by Patricia Jordan, DVM