Sotomayor Says Court May Rule to Limit First Amendment in Response to Wikileaks

Sotomayor Says Court May Rule to Limit First Amendment in Response to Wikileaks


Kurt Nimmo
Prison Planet.com
Saturday, August 28, 2010

On Thursday, talking to students at the University of Denver, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor said the Wikileaks case will result in the Court likely weighing the First Amendment against national security. She made the comment in response to a question posed by a student.




Sotomayor made her comments about the First Amendment at the University of Denver on Thursday.


“That was not the beginning of that question, but an issue that keeps arising from generation to generation, of how far we will permit government restriction on freedom of speech in favor of protection of the country,” Sotomayor said. “There’s no black-and-white line.” According to Sotomayor, the balance between national security and free speech is “a constant struggle in this society, between our security needs and our first amendment rights, and one that has existed throughout our history.”

Following the release of over 90,000 documents by Wikileaks in July, the Pentagon found no evidence that the disclosure harmed U.S. national security or endangered American troops in the field. The Pentagon review team consists of military intelligence analysts, lawyers and others working for the Joint Chiefs of Staffs and other elements of the Defense Department.

The Obama administration and certain members of Congress, however, have portrayed the release as a dire threat to national security. Obama asked Britain, Germany, Australia, and other allies to consider criminal charges against Wikileaks founder Julian Assange. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said the organization is guilty of “moral culpability” in the murder of U.S. soldiers. The ranking Republican on the House Homeland Security Committee, Rep. Peter King, said the release of documents violates espionage laws and amounts to treason. The FBI is investigating and the Justice Department said it was looking into pursuing criminal charges in the case. Rep. Mike Rogers, a Michigan Republican, has demanded the death penalty for SPC Bradley Manning, the man arrested and charged with providing the documents to Wikileaks.

Julian Assange had contacted the White House prior to releasing the documents and the New York Times acted as an intermediary. Wikileaks wanted to give the government a chance to make sure innocent people were identified, but the White House did not respond to the offer. The Times, Britain’s The Guardian, and the German weekly Der Spiegel published selected Wikileaks documents without consulting the government.

Sotomayor’s comment is a warning that the Supreme Court may soon use the Wikileaks case to restrict the First Amendment. In the United States, the corporate media did not report on her comments, with the notable exception of the Associated Press.

(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)



Prior to her comments, Sen. Charles Schumer and Sen. Dianne Feinstein said the Free Flow of Information Act may need to be modified in response to Wikileaks. The senators want to change the language to specify that Wikileaks and organizations like it will not be able to use the act to protect the identities of confidential sources. Kurt Wimmer, an attorney representing the Newspaper Association of America, agreed with this exclusion. “There’s a distinction (between) how Wikileaks works and how news media organizations work,” he said and described Wikileaks as more of “a drop box for leaked documents” than a legitimate news source.



As the government prepares to roll back the First Amendment under the rubric of national security, we should consider the words of Hugo Black, considered one of the most influential Supreme Court justices in the 20th century, who said the following in the Pentagon Papers case:

In the First Amendment, the Founding Fathers gave the free press the protection it must have to fulfill its essential role in our democracy. The press was to serve the governed, not the governors. The Government’s power to censor the press was abolished so that the press would remain forever free to censure the Government. The press was protected so that it could bare the secrets of government and inform the people. Only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government. And paramount among the responsibilities of a free press is the duty to prevent any part of the government from deceiving the people and sending them off to distant lands to die of foreign fevers and foreign shot and shell. (Emphasis added.)

Kurt Nimmo edits Infowars.com. He is the author of Another Day in the Empire: Life In Neoconservative America.





Login
Username:


Password:


Remember me



Register
Lost your password?

45 Responses to “Sotomayor Says Court May Rule to Limit First Amendment in Response to Wikileaks”
Jim Lunsford Says:

August 28th, 2010 at 1:52 pm
blah, blah, blah. The supreme court of cross dressing old fools can say whatever they want, but it will only be individuals who refuse to shut up who will have rights. In other words, whatever they say doesn’t matter to a free person. A free person is undefeatable because they refuse to submit, not because they are victorious in every battle. Any time you stand up and refuse to submit, whether you live or die, as long as you don’t submit, you are victorious. And only that person has any rights at all. Because they, as an individual, have refused to bend to the tyranny of the majority.

Aidan Monaghan Reply:

August 28th, 2010 at 2:02 pm

National Security: the security of the fortunes of the military-industrial complex, often confused with the security of the public at large.

Quantummonkeybutt Reply:

August 28th, 2010 at 2:38 pm

“…the release of documents violates espionage laws and amounts to treason…”

- Representative Peter King; Ranking Republican, House Homeland Security Committee

oooh, The ‘New World Order’ Puppet-Whore FINALLY Has The Guts To Use The ‘T’ Word, huh???

Well Tell Me, Monkey Boy…Where Were You On ‘911′ When The INSIDE SHADOW MILITARY TRAITOR SCUM OF THE CIA AND NSA (BUSH-CHENEY-HALLIBURTON, INC.) WERE FU&%ING AMERICA And Committing A “Coup d’état”???

And Tell Me, Where Were You When Dubya Was Signing The ‘Patriot Act’, And Wiping The Constitution With His A$$???

Gad, Are There Any REAL Human Beings Becoming Something Other Than A Lobotomized ‘New World Order’ Puppet-Whore Satanic Slave Out There???

QMB
metamorphosis

reconscoutsniper Reply: