Saturday, November 4, 2017

Roundup Weedkiller Linked To Global Epidemic of Fatal Kidney Disease

Roundup Weedkiller Linked To Global Epidemic of Fatal Kidney Disease

Posted on: Tuesday, February 25th 2014 at 8:45 pm
Written By: Sayer Ji, Founder
This article is copyrighted by GreenMedInfo LLC, 2014

Photo credit: Ed Kashi for La Isla Foundation/VII
The mystery of what is causing thousands to die each year from a fatal kidney disease may now be solved, with evidence pointing to the world's most heavily used herbicide Roundup (glyphosate) as the primary culprit.
A new study published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health proposes a link between the herbicide known as Roundup (aka glyphosate) and a series of mysterious epidemics of fatal chronic kidney disease of unknown origin (CKDu) affecting several poor farming regions around the world. 
The extent of the health problem is so massive that the Center for Public Integrity found that CKDu has killed more people in El Salvador and Nicaragua than diabetes, AIDS and leukemia combined, over the past 5 years on record.
Titled, "Glyphosate, Hard Water and Nephrotoxic Metals: Are They the Culprits Behind the Epidemic of Chronic Kidney Disease of Unknown Etiology in Sri Lanka?," researchers hypothesized that while glyphosate is toxic, it alone is not capable of destroying kidney tissue on the scale recently observed in rice paddy regions of Northern Sri Lanka, or in El Salvador where it is the second leading cause of death among men. They propose glyphosate becomes extremely toxic to the kidney when it mixes with 'hard' water or heavy metals like arsenic and cadmium, either naturally present in the soil or added externally through fertilizer inputs. Hard water contains 'metals,' such as calcium, magnesium, strontium and iron, along with carbonate, bicarbonate, sulphate and chlorides.
The new hypothesis explains a number of observations connected with the disease, including why in afflicted regions like Sri Lanka there has been a strong association between the consumption of hard water and the occurrence of this special kidney disease, with 96% of CKDu patients having consumed hard or very hard water for at least five years.
The image below shows how closely water hardness and the prevalence of CKDu overlap:

The discovery of a 'new disease'
According to the study, a "Chronic Kidney Disease of Unknown etiology (CKDu)" was discovered among the rice paddy farms in Northern Central Province of Sri Lanka in the mid-1990s.  The condition spread quickly to other farming areas, and now afflicts 15% of working age people in the northern part of the country, or a total population of 400,000 patients with an estimated death toll of around 20,000. Watch the videos "Mystery in the Fields" and "Cycle of Death" for 5 minute documentaries providing additional background information on afflicted areas around the world.
CKDu does not carry the same known risk factors as chronic kidney disease, which include diabetes, high blood pressure and glomerular nephritis, an inflammatory kidney condition. The Sri Lankan Ministry of Health introduced criteria for CKDu in 2009, including:
  1. No past history of, or current treatment for diabetes mellitus or chronic and/or severe hypertension, snake bites, urological disease of known etiology or glomerulonephritis.
  2. Normal glycosylated hemoglobin levels (HbA1C ˂ 6.5%).
  3. Blood pressure ˂160/100 mmHg untreated or ˂140/90 mmHg on up to two
    antihypertensive agents.
Owing to the fact that geographical and socioeconomical factors play such a central role in determining risk, it has been assumed that environmental and occupational factors are the main causative agents and therefore that CKDu is a form of toxic nephropathy, i.e. chemically-induced damage. The authors point out that even the World Health Organization conducted studies to determine  the origin of CKDu, and that the general consensus is the disease as multiple causes, including:

  • Exposure to arsenic
  • Exposure to cadmium
  • Exposure to pesticides
  • Consumption of hard water
  • Low water intake
  • Exposure to high temperatures (and resultant dehydration)
The authors, however, propose: "Whatever hypothesis that is propounded should be able to answer the questions as to why CKDu is confined to certain geographical areas of Sri Lanka and why there was no CKDu in Sri Lanka prior to the 1990s."
Roundup Weedkiller (Glyphosate) The Likely Culprit
The study goes on to detail how since 1977 political changes in Sri Lanka lead to large scale importation and application of agrochemicals, especially for rice paddy farming. They propose that 12-15 years of cumulative exposure to low concentration kidney-damaging compounds, along with their increasing bioaccumulation within the environment and human body, could explain the sudden appearance in the 1990's of clinically identifiable CKDu.  They hypothesized the existence of a so-called Compound "X" as the incriminating agent, which they determined would have to have the following characteristics:
  • A compound made of recently (2–3 decades) introduced chemicals to the CKDu endemic area.
  • Ability to form stable complexes with hard water.
  • Ability to capture and retain arsenic and nephrotoxic metals and act as a "carrier"
    in delivering these toxins to the kidney.
  • Possible multiple routes of exposure: ingestion, dermal and respiratory absorption.
  • Not having a significant first pass effect when complexed with hard water.
  • Presenting difficulties in identification when using conventional analytical methods.
Following an extensive search they arrived at glyphosate, which is the most widely used herbicide in Sri Lanka, as the likely culprit. They describe how glyphosate's half-life can increase from several weeks in normal water to many years in hard water, as it forms hard to biodegrade glyphosate-metal complexes (GMCs).  GMC exposure can happen in two ways: consumption of contaminated hard water, or it can form within the human body following glyphosate's entry into circulation. Farmers (and their families) are at constant risk of exposure through skin or inhalation, in addition to untreated drinking water.
The study describes in depth the way in which GMCs may evade the liver's detoxification mechanisms and damage the kidneys. This is in addition to the over 20 distinct modes of toxicity we have indexed on the GreenMedInfo.com database on glyphosate harms.
Finally, the authors discuss evidence that glyphosate may be behind similar epidemics of chronic kidney disease of unknown cause in Central American countries of El Salvador, Nicaragua and Costa Rica, and India.
To read the entire open access study visit this link: www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/2/2125


Sayer Ji is founder of Greenmedinfo.com, a reviewer at the International Journal of Human Nutrition and Functional Medicine, Co-founder and CEO of Systome Biomed, Vice Chairman of the Board of the National Health Federation, Steering Committee Member of the Global Non-GMO Foundation.

Geoengineering Watch Global Alert News, November 4, 2017 ( Dane Wigingto...

Ep. 297: The Swamp Wins on Taxes and the Fed

(ALERT). 11/3/17. Post Market Wrap Up: BIGGEST RANT EVER! Do Not Miss Th...

Friday, November 3, 2017

What is Your Greatest Cancer Risk?

What Is Your Greatest Cancer Risk?

Posted on: Monday, October 30th 2017 at 3:15 pm
Written By: Kelly Brogan, M.D.
This article is copyrighted by GreenMedInfo LLC, 2017

Have you heard of spontaneous remissions?
You know, getting better, like completely better, without classical medical intervention?
The conventional world goes out of their way not to document, study, or even acknowledge these “outliers”  – many of which Dr. Kelly Turner is now devoted to cataloguing. In fact, most patients who recover from diagnoses like terminal cancer, are told that they were probably misdiagnosed to begin with.
That’s why working with Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez changed my life. His meticulous notes, radiographically and surgically confirmed presenting diagnoses, and his decade long dedication to disrupting the conventional cancer care paradigm continue to haunt the establishment. Particularly in his posthumously published case reports.
Working with this sacred healer convinced me that there are no carve outs to what is possible in the realm of radical, transformational health journeys – hypertension, diabetes, Lyme disease, and terminal cancers were all exchanged for long-term vitality on a health regimen that was completely and totally within the patient’s control.
He had cracked the code, as far as I was concerned. His approach, and the approach of his surviving colleague, Dr. Linda Isaacs, is predicated on three pillars – personalized diet, personalized supplementation, and detox including daily coffee enemas. But there was one magic ingredient that he taught me was indispensable: mindset. In fact, he counseled me on my own overly permissive approach to working with patients, any and all.
The outcomes that I have achieved in my practice since incorporating his teachings have lead me to spend most of my spare time writing up case reports for the peer-reviewed primary medical literature. Because these cases defy the orthodoxy. They demonstrate that disease labels can be shed. That symptoms can transform. And that vitality can be reclaimed.
Through this lens, illness is more than just bad luck, bad genes, and something to “survive”. Illness, even grave and disabling illness is an invitation to your next chapter in life.
From my perspective, this chapter, this more conscious life is predicated on deep respect for and reunion with the body, with nature, and with our own sense of wholeness derived from our unique contribution to the collective. What comes from this foundational practice of healing is a sense of control and empowerment. It is a mindset shift.
Sometimes, what comes with this mindset shift is the liberation of energy that would have otherwise been dedicated to resisting reality. Perhaps this shift alone is responsible for the healing rather than the actual interventions and changes?
Can our body express what our conscious mind doesn’t know?
As it turns out, the mind-body connection is not a highway between two destinations. It’s far more enmeshed than that as Dr. Candace Pert tried to tell us decades ago through her scientific research.

The mother of psychoneuroimmunology, Pert helped us to understand that perceived stress – conscious or not – influences all elements of our physiology. That our entire physical being is also simultaneously an emotional being and a thinking being. We are all of it everywhere at once.
If we do not honor all aspects of our felt experience, if we suppress and oppress negative emotions like anger and sadness, our body tells us that this is not ok. That is because aspiring to experience only contentedness and a stress-free life requires segmenting off part of ourselves and compromising our authenticity. Because sadness, grief, anger, and pain are a part of the alchemy of the human experience.
How stress can kill
When the Body Says No is Dr. Gabor Maté’s opus on the ways in which stress drives illnesses such as autoimmunity and cancer. Ushering us over the sticky threshold of gene-based dogma, Maté weaves a new scientific story for the nature of chronic illness. A slow drip of scientific evidence, this book takes the incontrovertible stance that illness is, in part, an emotional expression of maladaptive stress-response habits.
This new perspective on health and illness takes on a very simple agenda: it seeks to include the person. Conventional medicine does not, in any way, account for the person with the diagnosis. That’s why hospitals are notorious for dehumanizing patients by calling them the cirrhosis case in bed 304. In the medicine I learned, your beliefs, your experience, your family dynamics, your temperament…none of these elements are anything more than a politically correct window dressing to the “real” history of present illness, diagnosis, and treatment.
Conventional medicine believes that illness is the result of linear cause and effect.
This tenet is eroded, however, by a simple fact, apparent to all.
Exposure to risk – whether it’s cigarettes or testable genes like the “breast cancer gene” – is not sufficient for criteria for illness. These exposures exist in a majority who never develop diagnosable clinical illness. How do we explain these risk factors then in the context of the lifestyles, personalities, and experiences of those who do develop illness?
Maté asks what I have come to wonder – does illness have personal meaning? Is it a serious wake up call to integrate aspects of yourself that you have chosen to ignore?
Unexpressed anger as a driver of illness
Is it possible that nice people get seriously sick more often?
A reductionist inquiry inspired by the science supporting a cancer personality type, Maté makes the argument that people pleasers and those who otherwise suppress their own emotional needs in service of others are at particular risk for developing immune-related illnesses.
Why?
It’s quite simple. There is a very particular kind of chronic stress related to this kind of self-denial. These people are emotionally controlled by others. They are relegated to a subordinate position. Disempowered and helpless.
It appears that one of the true risk factors for cancer and autoimmunity is an experience of childhood trauma – acute or chronic – wherein survival is linked to conforming to expectations that are self-violating. In fact, Maté says that every single one of his patients has struggled with emotional repression as a coping style and that not one of them could answer yes to the following question: “When, as a child, you felt sad, upset or angry, was there anyone you could talk to  – even when he or she was the one who had triggered your negative emotions?”
Where do the emotions go?
Maté defines repression as “dissociating emotions from awareness and relegating them to the unconscious realm” which “disorganizes and confuses our physiological defenses so that in some people these defenses go awry, becoming the destroyers of health rather than its protectors.”
In a 10 year prospective Yugoslavian study cited in Maté’s text, the greatest single risk factor for death but particularly cancer, was “rationality and anti-emotionality,” noting that in the absence of anger repression, smokers had no risk of lung cancer.

Another long-term prospective study of medical students conducted at Johns Hopkins also concluded “ Our results appear to agree with findings that cancer patients ‘tend to deny and repress conflictual impulses and emotions to a higher degree than to other people.’”
And yet another longitudinal breast cancer study concluded that “neoplastic spread to be associated with a repressive personality style, reduced expression of negative affect, helplessness-hopelessness, chronic stress, and comforting daydreaming.”
Perhaps cancer is a highly personal experience, rather than a plug and play diagnosis, prognosis, treatment model that in no way accounts for these characterologic variants.
When sleeping dogs wake: why do dormant cancer cells turn to clinical disease?
Apparently, based on autopsy, up to 30% of us are walking around with microscopic breast cancers, so what turns those cellular changes into cancer that can kill? What are the conditions for this process to kick off?
Incredible longitudinal research has supported the ability to predict with 75-78% accuracy those that have clinical evidence of cancer or who have died from it based on measures of repressed anger and long-lasting hopelessness.
Similarly, for prostate cancer incidence, Japanese men in the US have over two and a half times greater incidence of this diagnosis. Clearly, genetics are not the primary driver here. In fact, on autopsy, similar rates of inactive malignant cells were found regardless of geography! This has also been found to be the case in African American vs Nigerian men who have the same number of silent prostate cancer cells but a sixfold increase in cancer rates. Simply incredible to conceive of the fact that stress is the fertilizer to these cells that otherwise have no potential to harm.
So could our nation-wide obsession with ease, comfort, and happiness – as evidenced by our magic pill for any and all distress consciousness – be driving cancer epidemics?
To complicate matters, Maté cites data that suggests that seeming stress-free breast cancer patients are more likely to be dead at follow up. Positive thinking and emotions are not the same as genuine joy, he clarifies. They are a distraction technique from the fuller arena of emotional terrain. They defy the meaning and importance of a range of “negative” emotions that inform our authentic self – a self that seems to require essential expression for vital health.
Negative thinking allows us to gaze unflinchingly on our own behalf at what does not work. We have seen in study after study that compulsive positive thinkers are more likely to develop disease and less likely to survive. Genuine positive thinking – or more deeply, positive being – empowers us to know that we have nothing to fear from truth.
So what is a nice person to do?
Maté educates us about the goal of a fuller emotional breadth of experience and how to tangle with emotions that scare us.
He writes:
Emotional competence requires:
  • The capacity to feel our emotions, so that we are aware when we are experiencing stress;
  • The ability to express our emotions effectively and thereby to assert our needs and to maintain the integrity of our emotional boundaries;
  • The facility to distinguish between psychological reactions that are pertinent to the present situation and those that represent residue from the past. What we want and demand from the world needs to conform to our present needs, not to unconscious, unsatisfied needs from childhood. If distinctions between past and present blur, we will perceive loss or the threat of loss where none exists and
  • The awareness of those genuine needs that do require satisfactions, rather than their repression for the sake for gaining the acceptance or approval of others.
If that’s the goal, here are some tips to work towards it:
True prevention
Think mammogramsPSA screenings, and thyroid ultrasounds are prevention? Think again. The data is clear that screening is a direct path to needless interventions and morbidity trumped up by the very industries that profit from long-term pharmaceutical treatment.
True prevention looks more like dedicated self love.
Cancer and autoimmunity are classical examples of the multiple simultaneous narrative model of medicine – where there are many concurrent explanations for what is going on. Maybe my Hashimoto’s diagnosis was related to mercury exposure from my college Hep B vaccine (yes it had mercury in it that has now been replaced by aluminum). Maybe it was from gluten-induced molecular mimicry. Maybe it was from the stress of residency. Maybe it was from my unexpressed truth manifesting in my throat chakra. Maybe it’s all of these.
That’s why prevention can start with exhibiting a deep regard for yourself, every day. Send your body, mind, and spirit a signal of safety from multiple directions. From my perspective this looks like meditation, detox, and high integrity nutrition. This is an empowering practice and one that makes room for emotions to course through the terrain like gusts of wind, when necessary. There’s nothing to knock over or disturb once you get clear like this, it just moves through.
Stop worrying and get curious
If symptoms or even a diagnosis strikes, meet it with curiosity. Worry serves nothing. In fact, it perpetuates that stress response that may be driving the entire health struggle. Ask what needs to be exposed, honored, balanced. Then find the approach, the medicine, or the healing that speaks to what you learn about your deepest needs for this lifetime. Accept the invitation to get real with yourself and start over so that you can experience the wonder of being truly yourself, fully expressed.
Practice radical acceptance
Accept what is – that doesn’t mean you have to like it, just that you start first with acknowledging that it is. Say, yes, this is happening. Then proceed from there. Accept and own your flaws, mistakes, shortcomings. Accept and own your symptoms, their consequences, and impact. Accept and own all that you do not know. Let it be ok.
Feel the feeling
We need to feel. When we stuff it, fight it, say no to it, it festers and transmutes into the physical as if to find another way to tell us that our whole selves are the only acceptable selves. When you have strong emotions coursing through, put them into your body. Exercise, put on some music and dance, engage in an Eastern movement practice. Note where in your body you sense it and watch it. It will move through and transform. This is how we get out of the “rational”, unbalanced masculine states that can lead our bodies to communicate through disease states.
Embracing the shadow
Make room, at all stages in life, for felt darkness and “negativity”. Explore it, feel it, observe it. Understand that every single person is constructed of polarities. We may have some qualities more dominant than others, but the opposite is in there somewhere. When people or experiences make us angry, it’s our anger that they give rise to. And that anger wants expression so it’s almost like we take opportunities to feel something, anything, and our felt emotion is universal rather than specific to circumstances. It wants and needs to be felt.
Try taking on a 40 day practice of Fists of Anger – a kundalini meditation that will move that energy through you and out. Start with just 3 minutes a day as the best cancer prevention you can invest in.
As we move into this incredible time where the newest science reflects the oldest wisdom, we are simultaneously learning that becoming whole is as simple as finally owning ourselves and our full experience of this life.

Dr. Brogan is boarded in Psychiatry/Psychosomatic Medicine/Reproductive Psychiatry and Integrative Holistic Medicine, and practices Functional Medicine, a root-cause approach to illness as a manifestation of multiple-interrelated systems. After studying Cognitive Neuroscience at M.I.T., and receiving her M.D. from Cornell University, she completed her residency and fellowship at Bellevue/NYU. She is one of the nation’s only physicians with perinatal psychiatric training who takes a holistic evidence-based approach in the care of patients with a focus on environmental medicine and nutrition. She is also a mom of two, and an active supporter of women's birth experience. She is the Medical Director for Fearless Parent, and an advisory board member for GreenMedInfo.com. Visit her website.
Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.
Internal Site Commenting is limited to members

Disqus commenting is available to everyone.

Russian Officials to be Charged with DNC Hacking? No Evidence, No Hacking Occurred!

Russian Officials to be Charged with DNC Hacking? No Evidence, No Hacking Occurred!

Russian Officials to be Charged with DNC Hacking? No Evidence, No Hacking Occurred!

 34 
  1  0 
 
  35
VISIT MY NEW WEB SITE: 
America’s deeply corrupted political system is too debauched to fix. Virtually daily, clear evidence proves it overwhelmingly.
A bipartisan criminal class runs things. Malevolent deep state power directs Washington’s agenda. Fantasy democracy gives the system cover.
Simple due diligence reveals what’s going on, a tyrannical nation bent on world conquest and dominance, more dangerous and ruthless than any others in history.
Humanity’s fate hangs in the balance, catastrophic nuclear war virtually certain if things proceed on their present course.
According to the Wall Street Journal, the Justice Department claims it has enough evidence to charge over six Russian military and intelligence officials with hacking DNC computers before last year’s US presidential election.
Fact: It has none except what it may have invented. No Russian hacking occurred. More on this below.
America’s intelligence community accused Vladimir Putin of ordering a campaign to help Trump defeat Hillary.
Fact: The claim is a bald-faced lie. Not a shred of evidence of alleged Russian hacking or Putin’s involvement was presented in over a year since accusations first surfaced.
Fact: Months of House, Senate and special council Robert Mueller investigations found nothing – because there’s nothing to find.
Yet investigations continue, wasting time and money, part of longstanding Russia bashing, along with distracting public attention from more pressing issues, including:
— endless US wars of aggression against nonbelligerent states – the highest of high crimes;
— other wars perhaps readying to be launched – North Korea and Iran prime targets;
— bipartisan war on social justice – heading toward eliminating it altogether;
— the unprecedented wealth transfer from ordinary people to super-rich ones;
— monied interests exploiting ordinary people – supported by presidents and Congress;
— the nation increasingly a ruler-serf society – thirdworldized, poverty the leading growth industry;
— freedom-destroying police state laws, and much more, proving America is a tyrannical plutocracy, not a democracy.
I’ve written numerous articles debunking the phony Russian hacking story – delegitimizing Trump for the wrong reasons and relentlessly bashing Russia, why the malicious campaign surfaced last year and continues, even though it doesn’t have a leg to stand on.
Last March, former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan Craig Murray explained claims about Russian US election hacking were fabricated.
“The source of these emails and leaks has nothing to do with Russia at all,” he said.
“I discovered what the source was when I attended the Sam Adam‘s whistleblower award in Washington,” he explained. “The source of these emails comes from within official circles in Washington DC. You should look to Washington not to Moscow.”
“WikiLeaks has never published any material received from the Russian government or from any proxy of the Russian government. It’s simply a completely untrue claim designed to divert attention from the content of the material.”
Misinformation and Big Lies repeated enough get most people to believe them – why polls show most Americans believe the phony Russian hacking story. Media scoundrels suppress vital truths exposing the ruse.
Last summer, highly respected investigative journalist Seymour Hersh revealed that the CIA is behind Russiagate.
Claims about Russian US election hacking, along with alleged improper or illegal Trump team ties to Moscow, were fabricated – a John Brennan operation.
DNC staffer Seth Rich leaked its emails. WikiLeaks published them – Rich later lethally shot in Washington.
America’s intelligence community’s accusation about Russian hacking is a fabricated Big Lie. No hacking occurred!
Hersh and Craig Murray exposed Russiagate, its Big Lies invented and spread by the CIA.
Russia didn’t interfere in America’s election or any others. Washington does it repeatedly against numerous countries.
The Wall Street Journal published fabricated accusations it should have debunked as malicious malarkey!
My newest book as editor and contributor is titled “Flashpoint in Ukraine: How the US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III.”

Fluoroquinolone Antibiotics leave patients paralyzed with irreversible damage

Fluoroquinolone antibiotics leave patients paralyzed with irreversible damage
Posted by: Lori Alton, staff writer in Drug Dangers October 31, 2017 10 Comments




(NaturalHealth365) Vibrant, athletic young people who are now bedridden and housebound, formerly high-functioning professionals who have trouble remembering simple words – these individuals all have something in common. A common type of medication called fluoroquinolone antibiotics – often prescribed for such routine ailments as urinary tract infections and prostatitis – have caused devastating health conditions.
Fluoroquinolone toxicity, a disorder of the musculoskeletal system that can leave patients paralyzed, has affected tens of thousands of people to date – and experts say the harm may be irreparable.
Fluoroquinolone antibiotics make up over 16 percent of all antibiotics prescribed – worldwide
Fluoroquinolones, a class of synthetic, broad-spectrum antibiotics, include such common drugs as Cipro (ciprofloxacin) and Leviquin (levofloxacin).
Cipro is indicated for bacterial infections. In addition to being used to treat typhoid fever, anthrax, sepsis and plague, the medication is also used for more routine ailments – such as diarrhea, sinusitis, bronchitis and urinary tract infections. Leviquin is used to treat many of the same illnesses.
Listed as an “essential medicine” by the World Health Organization, Cipro is active against bacterial pathogens such E. coli, MRSA (methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus) and Klebsiella pneumoniae.
Cipro was administered to American troops during the Gulf War to protect against chemical weapon attacks, and was also given to civilian workers at the Postal Service, the Capitol and the White House during the anthrax scare of 2001.
Oral fluoroquinolones continue to be prescribed, with over 22 million Americans receiving prescriptions for the medications in 2014 alone.
Over 180,000 injuries and fatalities may be just the tip of the iceberg
According to RxISK.org, an independent website run by researchers who use data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Reporting System, there were 79,000 suspected Cipro-related adverse reactions – including 1,700 fatalities – between the years 2005 and 2015.
In addition, 1,000 deaths and 80,000 adverse reactions were associated with Leviquin.
Many health professionals say that these numbers grossly underrepresent the scope of the incidence of adverse reactions – with one study estimating that only 1 to 15 percent of adverse effects are ever reported.
Fluoroquinolones can cause a tragic constellation of unwanted health effects
According to a warning issued by Cipro’s manufacturer, Bayer, ciprofloxacin can damage tendons, cartilage, bone and muscle – as well as affecting the heart and central nervous system.
The most common adverse effect is tendon ruptures – particularly of the Achilles tendon. In fact, one study reports that the use of fluoroquinolones makes a ruptured Achilles tendon four times more likely to occur.
In 2008, the FDA issued a “black box” warning for fluroquinolone antibiotics, advising that the drugs could cause tendonitis and ruptured tendons – as well as a long list of other adverse effects. These included peripheral neuropathy – which features burning, tingling and numbness in the extremities – seizures, difficulty breathing, eye disorders, cognitive issues and psychiatric disorders such as psychosis and panic.
Fluoroquinolones can also worsen myasthenia gravis, a disorder of muscle weakness.
Other dangers of fluoroquinolones include hypersensitivity reactions and liver failure – along with serious, potentially fatal reactions when used with theophylline, a medication used to treat asthma and emphysema.
Toxicities can occur within a day of starting fluoroquinolones, and the risk is increased for patients over 60, patients with kidney, heart or lung transplants, and those taking corticosteroids.
Shocking statistics: Up to 50 percent of prescriptions for fluoroquinolones may be unnecessary and ineffective
Although fluoroquinolone antibiotics can be lifesaving, experts say they should be viewed as a “drug of last resort,” to be used only when no other option exists.
However, an eye-opening study published in BMC Infectious Diseases found that almost a third of the fluoroquinolone regimens given to patients at a Cleveland hospital were for syndromes where antibiotics were not warranted at all. Of the regimens that were appropriate, the authors said that most could have been replaced by a drug with fewer side effects.
And a study conducted by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that fully half of all prescribed fluoroquinolone drugs were unnecessary. And, they rarely issues such statements.
As for Bayer, the company maintains that their labeling “accurately reflects the benefit-risk profiles” of its fluoroquinolone drugs – and claims it sent warning letters to healthcare providers in both 2008 and 2011, stressing that some adverse effects could be permanent.
For some, this is not enough.
Rachel Brummert, executive director of the patient advocacy group Quinolone Vigilance Foundation, says that the pharmaceutical industry should do more to warn physicians of the risk of injury.
“Doctors are largely in the dark,” she states. “The few patients who are warned are not told that these adverse reactions can be permanent.”
Dr. Beatrice Golomb, a professor of medicine at the University of California, San Diego, agrees that the effects of fluoroquinolones can be permanent. She also describes them as “tragic” and “horrifying.”
“Fluoroquinolones can … take young lives and really destroy them,” Dr. Golomb declares.
Although fluoroquinolones are used by millions without incident, the chance of toxicity does exists – making it a gamble that many do not want to take. It’s best to be vigilant about prescribed medications, and refuse fluoroquinolones unless there is no other option available.
Editor’s note: Get INSTANT access to the Immune Defense Summit and discover the many natural ways to eliminate the threat of superbugs, viruses and chronic disease issues.
Sources for this article include: