By Attorney Jonathan Emord
Author of "The Rise of Tyranny" and
"Global Censorship of Health Information" and
"Restore The Republic"
December 19, 2012
NewsWithViews.com
Author of "The Rise of Tyranny" and
"Global Censorship of Health Information" and
"Restore The Republic"
December 19, 2012
NewsWithViews.com
“But whoso shall offend one of
these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone
were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.”
Those words of Jesus Christ from Matthew 18:6 remind us of the fate for those so
utterly depraved as to take the lives of precious and innocent children. The
bereaved parents of children killed in the Newtown, Connecticut massacre now try
to cope in overcoming the single greatest loss one can experience in life, the
loss of a child. In addition to the 20 children killed by Adam Lanza, he took
the lives of 7 school administrators and his own. The families of those 7 are
like the families of the twenty children killed, in need of our prayers and
solace.
From this
enormous tragedy, many in public policy circles now renew calls for gun control,
as if removing guns from the law abiding would improve the defense of society.
The legal answer to this question is provided to us by the Second Amendment.
Guns were meant to provide for the defense of the citizenry and are protected
from government confiscation. The solution to the problem does not lie in prior
restraints that would deprive all of the law abiding of the means to defend
themselves in an increasingly violent world, it does not lie in yet another
government commission on school violence, and it does not lie in a “national
conversation” about violence in the schools. Moreover, it does not lie in trying
to account for evil, as if utter depravity were explainable in secular terms (it
is not). We do not need greater psychoanalysis of school children or greater
psychoanalysis of their parents. Rather, the answer lies in fortifying all
public schools so that children may be safe and would be intruders can be
rapidly eliminated.
Precisely what
changes could help stem school violence? I recommend that each state (not the
federal government) provide professional security for its public schools. The
following 6 steps would substantially reduce the incidence of, and harms
associated with, acts of terror in the schools.
(1) School
faculty should be trained in techniques to distract and disable those who pose a
threat. Each should be equipped with pepper spray, tazers, and concussion and
smoke grenades as well as training in the proper use of those during an attack
and in hand to hand combat.
(2) School faculty emergency response teams should be formed and trained from among the most physically able school personnel. They should be trained to use small arms. There should be a safe room in each school where arms are kept along with bullet proof vests to enable the emergency response teams to respond immediately to an assault.
(3) Schools should be reconstructed to provide ready access to underground escape routes which would be kept secret except in times of emergency to lead children out of harms’ way rapidly without the risk of injury from a public exit.
(4) Classrooms should have floor exits to the underground escape routes constructed through closets and floors to enable rapid movement of children out of harms’ way in the event of an attack.
(5) Retired military sharp shooters and others trained as police sharp shooters should be assigned to schools and trained to shoot from various vantage points within schools. They should be hired onto school staff and work daily in the schools as plain clothed janitors, etc., blending into the fabric of the school but ready at a moment’s notice to take out an armed intruder.
(6) Public access to schools must be limited to discrete checkpoints where armed personnel are stationed and those check points need hidden areas nearby where armed personnel can observe entry and intervene if those at the stations are killed during an intrusion.
(2) School faculty emergency response teams should be formed and trained from among the most physically able school personnel. They should be trained to use small arms. There should be a safe room in each school where arms are kept along with bullet proof vests to enable the emergency response teams to respond immediately to an assault.
(3) Schools should be reconstructed to provide ready access to underground escape routes which would be kept secret except in times of emergency to lead children out of harms’ way rapidly without the risk of injury from a public exit.
(4) Classrooms should have floor exits to the underground escape routes constructed through closets and floors to enable rapid movement of children out of harms’ way in the event of an attack.
(5) Retired military sharp shooters and others trained as police sharp shooters should be assigned to schools and trained to shoot from various vantage points within schools. They should be hired onto school staff and work daily in the schools as plain clothed janitors, etc., blending into the fabric of the school but ready at a moment’s notice to take out an armed intruder.
(6) Public access to schools must be limited to discrete checkpoints where armed personnel are stationed and those check points need hidden areas nearby where armed personnel can observe entry and intervene if those at the stations are killed during an intrusion.
No comments:
Post a Comment