Robert Rowen

Dr. Robert J. Rowen 20 mins ·

READ THIS AND THEN HONORABLY TELL THIS FORUM WHY THERE IS NOT A “REASONABLE DOUBT” ABOUT VACCINES. (REASONABLE DOUBT IS THE STANDARD FOR A JURY TRIAL)
NEW CONCEPT – “HERD IMMUNE MODULATION”

OK. Enough with Anderson Cooper of CNN who tried to take down former Congressman Dan Burton over mercury in vaccines (CNN VIDEO 2-4-16). My only interaction with Anderson Cooper was indirect and many years ago (when he was at CBS), on a story in which I felt the reporting was deficient and biased. CBS actually interviewed me about it (as president of an international oxidation society), and sadly did nothing with the 100% irrefutable evidence and facts I provided which absolutely exonerated their target. Cooper’s vaccine interrogation of Mr. Burton appears to continue what seemingly is skewed and biased reporting to set a personal agenda rather than fair and balanced “rest of the story” reporting, as Paul Harvey would say.

So let’s return to the present. Let’s address, WITH SCIENCE, those who name call, resort to slander, and tell me I am putting their child’s life at risk by questioning vaccines. And Dr. Rowen won’t do it for you, since those people consider me pariah. I’ll let the most prestigious (arguably) medical journal in the world (New England Journal of Medicine) tell you by way of a brilliant treatise by Jean-Francois Bach, MD, DSC, tell you and see if the pundits will attempt to slam the journal and attack Dr. Bach. (NEJM, Vol. 347, No. 12 · September 19, 2002).
I encourage ALL of you to read this report, entitled “THE EFFECT OF INFECTIONS ON SUSCEPTIBILITY TO AUTOIMMUNE AND ALLERGIC DISEASES” by JEAN-FRANÇOIS BACH, M.D., D.SC.

Now I’ll simply clip and paste so that no one can accuse me of manipulating the report. I’ll place personal comments in brackets [ ].
Everything in quotes “ “ is copied and pasted directly from the article.

“Taken together, the data suggest that infectious agents [like measles, mumps rubella] stimulate the production of regulatory cells whose effects extend beyond the responses to the invading microbe (bystander suppression).” {Rowen note- We are discovering unbelievable complexity of the immune system in its efforts to do a good job dispatching infection, but not to overdo it and damage the host. Regulatory cells are a key discovery. Natural infections assist the regulatory cells to do their job in keeping your immune system from overdoing its job and harming you!)

“The transfer of maternal antiviral antibodies to newborns may also have a role in the susceptibility to autoimmune diseases. Zinkernagel suggested that decreased exposure of women to particular viruses before pregnancy may subsequently reduce the degree of protection against these viruses afforded to their newborns.119 Exposure to these viruses could provoke an immune response in the children that could ultimately lead to an autoimmune disease. This hypothesis could apply to the development of type 1 diabetes, in which rubella virus and coxsackie B virus have been implicated.” [Rowen note- For as long as we’ve been on the planet, mothers transferred natural immunity to their newborns from the mother’s own naturally developed immunity. We have circumvented that by eliminating natural infections. Bach seems suggesting that it’s good for women to get immune system exercise before pregnancy and if they don’t, the babies will have “reduced” maternal protection. Then, when they get an infection, their immune systems might move against the child’s body itself and create autoimmune disease like the nasty diabetes Type 1. Hmmm, instead of blaming a doctor for his child infecting another child and causing a complication, perhaps his child actually saved a case of a lifetime of insulin injections by spreading the communicable disease to enhance “herd” “immune modulation”. You’ve heard of “herd resistance” as the mantra of the vaccine pundits. I propose a new term for those who resist forced vaccines: “HERD IMMUNE MODULATION” as a result of immune system exercise with these infections. You may “blame” or "credit" me for the introduction of this concept. This article certainly supports this notion. We are seeing a terrible rise in Type 1 diabetes in recent years, as well as other immune disorders as I mentioned in the last post].

“Vaccination strategies should be examined in the context of the hygiene hypothesis, notably in relation to vaccination with bacille Calmette–Guérin. The problem is complex. Vaccinations may cause immunostimulation and thus have a favorable effect, or they may prevent “protective” infections and thus have an unfavorable effect.” [Rowen note- Mr. Anderson Cooper, did you read this NEJM report? And if not why not? And if you did, why did you not mention it?. Clearly the case of vaccinations is NOT closed as CNN and those pundits it promotes is claiming, and this is right out of the Bible of orthodox medicine – the NEJM]

“It is important to stress that there are no solid data indicating either a positive or a negative role of vaccinations in the development of auto- immune or allergic diseases.” [Rowen note- Hello out there! Even NEJM says we have no data indicating that all these vaccines are safe in the long run!]
“The potential benefit of antibiotic therapy in situations in which the pathogenic role of a bacterium is doubtful should be carefully assessed.” [Rowen note- Bach is even hitting the lunacy in medicine in which every infection is blasted with antibiotics, a now discredited medical practice, especially for childhood ear infection, that formerly was Gospel.] “In addition to the problem of antibiotic resistance, unnecessary treatment with antibiotics could reduce the degree of physiological immunostimulation afforded by commensal bacteria.”

[Now please carefully read the following, which is the author’s concluding statement and reread it; and I thank you in advance for sharing it with the those who will control your life from cradle to grave!]:
“There is a certain irony in the fact that we must now search for new ways to reproduce the infectious diseases against which we have been fighting with great success over the past three decades. The challenge is an important one because of the high MORBIDITY [emphasis added] of allergic and autoimmune diseases. (Morbidity means injury in contrast to mortality or death). In fact, it might extend to other immune disorders, notably non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas, the frequency of which is also increasing in developed countries.”132,133 [Rowen note- You might recall that I have repeatedly called for a major study on a large group of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated children to look for the ALL CAUSE morbidity and mortality differences or similarities between the groups. Clearly this key NEJM report is telling you that allergic and autoimmune diseases carry “high MORBIDITY” and the problem might be extending to even CANCERS, like lymphomas which are increasing in developed (vaccinated) countries! Hello out there! Are any of you death-demanding (license revocation) pro vaccinators reading your own most important journal? The author even says "we must now search" for ways to bring back what we've wiped out. HELLO OUT THERE! Is it possible that you or your child spreading a communicable disease to another will spare him of a CANCER? (let alone diabetes?) Note, this report addressed morbidity only. Now I’ll let another key journal give you a taste of potential MORTALITY increase from vaccines]:

[This report is entitled “Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity?” It was published in Hum Exp Toxicol. 2011 Sep; 30(9): 1420–1428. Thank you for reading the following unedited summary over and over to burn it into your brain. It is self-explanatory.]

“The US childhood immunization schedule requires 26 vaccine doses for infants aged less than 1 year, the most in the world, yet 33 nations have better IMRs. Using linear regression, the immunization schedules of these 34 nations were examined and a correlation coefficient of 0.70 (p < 0.0001) was found between IMRs and the number of vaccine doses routinely given to infants. When nations were grouped into five different vaccine dose ranges (12–14, 15–17, 18–20, 21–23, and 24–26), 98.3% of the total variance in IMR was explained by the unweighted linear regression model. These findings demonstrate a counter-intuitive relationship: nations that require more vaccine doses tend to have higher infant mortality rates.
Efforts to reduce the relatively high US IMR have been elusive. Finding ways to lower preterm birth rates should be a high priority. However, preventing premature births is just a partial solution to reduce infant deaths. A closer inspection of correlations between vaccine doses, biochemical or synergistic toxicity, and IMRs, is essential. All nations—rich and poor, advanced and developing—have an obligation to determine whether their immunization schedules are achieving their desired goals.”

[Rowen note-This was published only 4 years ago, and should rest unfounded criticisms of cites of literature from long ago. These scientists are saying that vaccines, r the harsh schedule of vaccines, is LIKELY (and with high statistical confidence) contributing to the unfortunately higher infant mortality in countries where vaccines are compelled, and we have a duty to look at this.

I’ll rest my case for the moment. However, I’d like to dedicate a few words to a certain Charles J. who chose to malign me here on a personal level rather than to address the issues head on. I sadly had to ban him from the page, but politely told him in a private message that I would honor him by posting anything he would send me privately that had substance, not smear.

He did respond as follows: “Your practice relies on the ignorance of suckers to sustain it. And while I would have no problem allowing you to separate fools from their money, your stances are exceptionally dangerous to the community, including my children.
You can keep your empty libelous threats to yourself. Truth is a great defense and we both know you wouldn't want any brighter lights shined on your conduct.
Enjoy the affirmations of the ignorant on this page, how fortunate you can't control the message at many other places.”

Mr. J., I respectfully ask you to respond scientifically and tactfully, how your children are endangered by an open discussion on forced vaccines, when the New England Journal of Medicine itself (suckers that NEJM and the other journal might be) is itself questioning the impact of vaccines on immunity. Their reported science suggests that your child getting an illness might prevent him from a disabling autoimmune disease, or even prevent a cancer in himself or another. Or when the second article tells us, with a statistical probability of 99.995% that the increase in infant mortality in Western countries is LIKELY vaccine related. I am RESPECTFULLY addressing you and all the other forced vaccine people here. (I was once pro-vaccines myself. I am not now “anti-vaccine” either. I AM PRO-CHOICE! And for the clear reasons on this page's posts. Choice becomes a win-win based on the very “facts” the pundits and the above articles are telling you.)

I am not name-calling or hurling unrelated trash at you. You may indeed know more than the authors of these amazing papers. Mr. Charles J., please share your wealth of knowledge and experience, which must not include personal attacks. I am open to seeing and sharing what you have. I ask the same courtesy of all who promote vaccines or oppose. I respect all views!

Please keep this a courteous site where we can promote information and help stimulate a responsible resolution to the controversy. And, regarding the “suckers” who come to my practice, I encourage you to view my you tube channel and publicly tell those who came forward to tell their healing story that they were “suckered.” They also deserve a respectful “face-to-face” insult.

And for Mr. Anderson Cooper of CNN (and any other mainstream or alternative news organization), I make this open challenge with due respect, since you openly stated you have read or reviewed “EVERY study” on the matter and you seem to know more about vaccines than Congressman Burton who conducted Congressional hearings for over 3 years regarding vaccine ingredients. I openly commit to engaging you, or any one of your choosing, in a FAIR and open forum on a level playing field. You may have EVERY expert behind you whispering in your ear during the process. I will come alone (as did David vs. Goliath), armed only with the slingshot of the logic of the claims of your pundits and the logic of the SCIENCE that I (and others) have here posted. A level playing field means no name-calling, no personal attacks or insults, no hitting below the belt, addressing ONLY the issue at hand, equal time for us both, respect for the opposition, no interruptions - just like in a televised presidential debate. This is a major public issue. We can do this in a live public forum or in any fashion that will reach the most people, and let them then judge.

(I always thought that the foremost duty of reporters was to fairly present the facts as seen from both sides and let the reader/viewer judge for themselves. I did not see that in what I felt was an intimidating approach to Mr. Burton)

None of us have lived lives of perfection. I certainly have not. We are here to learn and grow (and forgive and hopefully be forgiven). Nelson Mandella was once considered one of the greatest (political) criminals of his country, yet became one of the greatest men of ALL time. He forgave his oppressors. I am not a saint, but I want to be judged on this matter for the information and logic I bear, not for irrelevant matters, and not see medical licenses burned at the stake by those in a mob mentality and in absolute power as very similar things have happened in the past, including right here in America (Salem Witch Trials). Have we forgotten some of our sordid past, which could be easily repeated by mob mentality?

THANK YOU FOR LIKING AND SHARING THIS IMPORTANT INFORMATION