I
have always said that orthodox oncologists use treatments and
diagnostic procedures that cause cancer to treat and diagnose cancer. A
perfect example is mammography. Every mammogram a woman gets increases
her risk of breast cancer by 5%[1],[2] due to the radiation involved and mammograms frequently lead to over-diagnosis and unnecessary treatment.
|
Most
people sense that modern oncology is very dangerous. What is most
terrible about it though is that treatments are in no way intended to
target the cause or causes of cancer so even though the cancer industry
is constantly talking about finding the “cure,” that’s the last thing
on their agenda. The only treatments oncologists have to offer are
therapies that do not treat cancer but rather make the person sicker
and ultimately die a more horrible death.
|
Various
analyses show that past media coverage often gave incorrect messages
about the complexity of breast cancer, the age at which women are at
highest risk, the progress made and the importance of early detection.
|
Fran
Visco, the president of the National Breast Cancer Coalition, believes
the solution lies in science—specifically, in studying how breast
cancer develops and metastasizes. “We get sidetracked by efforts to
focus on getting every woman a mammogram,” she recently told The Daily Beast.
“We could screen every woman in the world, and we would not have
stopped breast cancer. I am not saying to stop funding for screening;
however, we cannot afford to make it a main focus.”
|
Recent
research indicates that the cause of cancer has very little to do with
genetics. We know some basic things about why cancer starts. We know
it is initiated under low-oxygen conditions. We know that it is
initiated also by trauma and especially by inflammation. We know with
low-oxygen conditions and inflammation we have infectious agents
running around out of control.
|
So
we have low O2, low CO2, low pH (acidity) and low cellular energy; we
have infection hordes fighting for their existence. Mix in some
inflammation, heavy-metal and chemical contamination and nutritional
deficiency (along with some genetic disruption) and we have the recipe
for CANCER—a beast that is eating the human race alive starting with
the old but now increasingly working its way down to the young and very
young where death should not be lurking.
|
Does
chemotherapy or radiation treat this condition? Does it treat cancer?
Does it kill cancer when it provokes more of it? There is nothing real
about orthodox oncology. How such inaccurate ideas like those of modern
oncology could be born in an intelligent race of beings is beyond
comprehension.
|
A new MIT study offers a comprehensive look at chemical and genetic changes that occur as inflammation progresses to cancer. One
of the biggest risk factors for liver, colon or stomach cancer is
chronic inflammation of those organs, often caused by viral or
bacterial infections.
In 2008 researchers in France found that one in six cancers are caused by treatable infections.[3] Helicobacter pylori, hepatitis B and C viruses, and human papillomaviruses were responsible for 1.9 million cases, mainly gastric, liver, and cervix uteri cancers. In women, cervix uteri cancer accounted for about half of the infection-related burden of cancer; in men, liver and gastric cancers accounted for more than 80%. Around 30% of infection-attributable cases occur in people younger than 50 years. |
The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine
tells us that, “Tumor promotion and progression are dependent on
ancillary processes provided by cells of the tumor environment but that
are not necessarily cancerous themselves. Inflammation has long been
associated with the development of cancer. This review will discuss the
reflexive relationship between cancer and inflammation with particular
focus on how considering the role of inflammation in physiologic
processes such as the maintenance of tissue homeostasis and repair may
provide a logical framework for understanding the connection between
the inflammatory response and cancer.[4]”
|
“It is believed that cancer is caused by an accumulation of mutations in cells of the body,” says Dr. Carlo M. Croce, professor and chair of molecular virology, immunology and medical genetics. “Our study[5] suggests that miR-155, which is associated with inflammation, increases the mutation rate and might be a key player in inflammation-induced cancers generally.”
This and many other studies show how inflammation can help cause
cancer. Chronic inflammation due to infection or to conditions such as
chronic inflammatory bowel disease is associated with up to 25% of all
cancers.
|
Chemotherapy
and radiation only make inflammation worse! These are not instruments
of cancer treatment and everyone knows that they have nothing to do
with cancer cures, which are illegal anyway. The best they can say is
that these treatments can extend your life beyond their predictions of
what would happen to you if you did not treat it in any coherent way.
|
“Pre-malignant tumors are ‘wound-like’.
Such tumors are similar to healing or desmoplastic tissue in many
ways, such as the presence of activated platelets. As described by
Coussens and Hanahan, tumor growth may be ‘biphasic’. In the first
phase, the body treats early tumors as wounds. This phase is
characterized by tumor growth mediated by the actions of the stroma
‘indirect control’ as occurs in physiologic tissue repair.”[6]
|
Are
chemotherapy and radiation appropriate treatments for wounds? The most
amazing thing about these treatments is that many do survive these
treatments, showing us how resilient the human body really is.
|
Cancer Cures vs. Cancer Death
|
Doctors
rarely talk about “curing” cancer. Instead, the success of treatment
is judged on whether a patient is alive five, 10 and 15 years after
diagnosis. It is amazing that, after all the slashing, burning and
poisoning that oncologists do, survival rates are actually up a little.
For instance at the turn of the decade the statistics for England and
Wales show that the five-year survival rate for all cancers in men is
31%, while for women the survival rate is 43%. The figures are similar
for Scotland. Today though still dismal, they are somewhat better.
|
But
are they really better? Certainly they would like us to think so but
one of the reasons for this is statistics. As Mark Twain said: “There
lies, damned lies and statistics.” The statistics look better because
they don’t put down that the person has died of cancer when they have
died of the side effects of radiation and chemotherapy. “Recently a
friend of mine died from rectal cancer and his wife was stunned to see
that the cancer was the third cause of death on the death certificate
after the infection and other problems caused by the treatment,” wrote
one of my readers.
|
This
would not have been counted as a cancer death. Also when a person is
treated for breast cancer and it moves from the breast to another area,
but they live five years after the breast cancer has been diagnosed,
it is recorded as a survival from breast cancer.
|
Dr. Mark Allan Sircus, Ac., OMD, DM (P)
Director International Medical Veritas Association Doctor of Oriental and Pastoral Medicine http://publications.imva.info http://blog.imva.info Find Us In: |
Monday, October 8, 2012
I have always said that orthodox oncologists use treatments and diagnostic procedures that cause cancer to treat and diagnose cancer.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment